Modeling the hydrological significance of wetland restoration scenarios

Journal of Environmental Management

Volumn 133, Issue , 2014, Pages 121-134

  Martinez Martinez, Edwin ^a   Nejadhashemi, A Pouyan ^a,b   Woznicki, Sean A ^b   Love, Bradley J ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Michigan State University   (United States)

Author keywords

Hydrologic modeling; Peak flow; Restoration; SWAT; Wetlands

Indexed keywords

FLOOD; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; NUMERICAL MODEL; PEAK FLOW; STREAMFLOW; WATER STORAGE; WATERSHED; WETLAND MANAGEMENT;

ARTICLE; ECOSYSTEM RESTORATION; FLOW RATE; HYDROLOGY; MODEL; RIVER BASIN; SOIL AND WATER ASSESSMENT TOOL; STREAM (RIVER); WATER FLOW; WATERSHED; WETLAND;

MICHIGAN; SHIAWASSEE RIVER; UNITED STATES;

HYDROLOGIC MODELING; PEAK FLOW; RESTORATION; SWAT; WETLANDS;

CALIBRATION; HYDROLOGY; MICHIGAN; MODELS, THEORETICAL; WETLANDS;

EID: 84890904346     PISSN: 03014797     EISSN: 10958630     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.11.046     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Acreman M., Holden J. How wetland affect floods. Wetlands 2013, 33:773-786.
2. Apfelbaum S., Bell J., Roland R., Mackey S., Khoury M., Hinz L. Identifying and Valuing Restoration Opportunities and Resource Improvements at Watershed and Subwatershed Scales 2007, Final Report GLPF Grant 758. Retrieved from:. http://www.glpf.org/sites/default/files/project_files/758%25201%2520Exec%2520Summ.pdf.
3. Arnold J.G., Allen P.M., Morgan D.S. Hydrologic model for design and constructed wetlands. Wetlands 2001, 21(2):167-178.
4. Arnold J.G., Srinivasan R., Muttiah R.S., Williams J.R. Large area hydrologic modeling and assessment Part I: model development. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1998, 34(1):73-89.
5. Burkett V., Kusler J. Climate change: potential impacts and interactions in wetlands of the United States. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2000, 36:313-320.
6. Carter R.W. Magnitude and frequency of floods in suburban areas. Geol. Survey Res. 1961, 5:B9-B11.
7. Carter V., Novitzki R., Hook D.D. Some comments on the relation between groundwater and wetlands. Ecol. Manage. Wetlands 1988, 1:68-86.
8. Conan C., de Marsily G., Bouraoui F., Bidoglio G. Along-term hydrological modelling of the Upper Guadiana river basin (Spain). Phys. Chem. Earth, Parts A/B/C 2003, 28:193-200.
9. Copeland C. Water Quality: Implementing the Clean Water Act 2006, Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, Retrieved from:. http://www.nationalaglawcenter.org/assets/crs/RL33466.pdf.
10. Dahl T.E. Wetland Losses in the United States: 1780's to 1980's 1990, U.S. Department of the Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, Washington, D.C. Jamestown, ND, Northern Prairie Wildlife Research Center (Version 16JUL97). Retrieved from:. http://www.npwrc.usgs.gov/resource/wetlands/wetloss/index.htm.
11. Dahl T.E. Status and Trends of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States 1986-1997 2000, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, Retrieved from:. http://library.fws.gov/Pubs9/wetlands86-97_lowres.pdf.
12. De Laney T.A. Benefits to downstream flood attenuation and water quality as a result of constructed wetlands in agricultural landscapes. J.Soil Water Conserv. 1995, 50(6):620-626.
13. Drexier J.Z., Bedford B.L., DeGaetano A.T., Siegel D.I. Quantification of the water budget and nutrient loading in a small peatland. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 1999, 35(4):753-769.
14. Engel B., Storm D., White M., Arnold J.G. Ahydrologic/water quality model application protocol. J.Am. Water Resour. Assoc. 2007, 43(5):1223-1236.
15. Fongers D. Mid-Shiawassee River Watershed Hydrologic Study 2010, Michigan Department of Natural Resources and Environment, Retrieved from:. http://www.michigan.gov/documents/deq/Midshiawasee-River-report_334332_7.pdf.
16. Gassman P.W., Reyes M.R., Green C.H., Arnold J.G. The soil and water assessment tool: historical development, applications, and future research directions. T.ASABE 2007, 50(4):1211-1250.
17. Hart R.A. Mussel (Bivalvia: Unionidae) Habitat Suitability Criteria for the Otter Tail River, Minnesota 1995, MS thesis, North Dakota State University.
18. Hattermann F.F., Krysanova V., Hesse C. Modelling wetland processes in regional applications. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 2008, 53(5):1001-1012.
19. Hawk L.L., Lipstein A.P., Solanki H.T. Wetland hydroperiod analysis. Proceedings 6th Biennial Stormwater Research and Watershed Management Conference 1999, 216-227.
20. Jenks G.F. The data model concept in statistical mapping. Int. Yearb. Cartogr. 1967, 7:186-190.
21. Jiang C.L., Fan X.Q., Cui G.B., Zhang Y.B. Removal of agricultural non-point source pollutants by ditch wetlands: implications for lake eutrophication control. Hydrobiologia 2007, 581:319-327.
22. Kirk J.A., Wise W.R., Delfino J.J. Water budget and cost-effectiveness analysis of wetland restoration alternatives: a case study of Levy Prairie, Alachua County, Florida. Ecol. Eng. 2004, 22(1):43-60.
23. Konyha K.D., Shaw D.T., Weiler K.W. Hydrologic design of a wetland: advantages of continuous modeling. Ecol. Eng. 1995, 4(2):99-116.
24. Leopold L.B. Hydrology for urban planning, a guidebook on the hydrologic effects of urban land use. U.S. Geolog. Surv. Circ. 1968, 554. Retrieved from:. http://enviro.lclark.edu/resources/Tryon/Water/Hydrology.pdf.
25. Liu Y., Yang W., Wang X. Development of a swat extension module to simulate riparian wetland hydrologic processes at a watershed scale. Hydrol. Process 2008, 22:2901-2915.
26. Martin H.M. Outline of the Geologic History of Shiawassee County 1958, Michigan Dept. of Conservation, Geological Survey Division.
27. Melles S.J., Benoy G., Booty B., Leon L., Vanrobaeys J., Wong I. Scenarios to investigate the effect of wetland position in a watershed on nutrient loadings. 2010 International Congress on Environmental Modelling and Software 2010, Retrieved from:. http://www.iemss.org/iemss2010/index.php?n=Main.Proceedings.
28. Moriasi D.N., Arnold J.G., Van Liew M.W., Blingner R.L., Harmel R.D., Veith T.L. Model evaluation guidelines for systematic quantification of accuracy in watershed simulations. T.ASABE 2007, 50(3):885-900.
29. Neitsch S.L., Arnold J.G., Kiniry J.R., Williams J.R. Soil and Water Assessment Tool Theoretical Documentation Version 2009 2011, Texas Water Resources Institute Technical Report No. 406. Retrieved from:. http://twri.tamu.edu/reports/2011/tr406.pdf.
30. Nejadhashemi A.P., Wardynski B.J., Munoz J.D. Large-scale hydrologic modeling of the Michigan and Wisconsin agricultural regions to study impacts of land use changes. T.ASABE 2012, 55(3):821-838.
31. NRC Wetlands, Characteristics, and Boundaries. Committee on Characterization of Wetlands 1995, National Academic Press, Washington D.C.
32. Raisin G., Bartley J., Croome R. Groundwater influence on the water balance and nutrient budget of a small natural wetland in Northeastern Victoria. Australia. Ecol. Eng. 1999, 12(1-2):133-147.
33. Ranieri E., Gorgoglione A., Solimeno A. Acomparison between model and experimental hydraulic performances in a pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland. Ecol. Eng. 2013, 60:45-49.
34. Reinelt L.E., Horner R.R. Pollutant removal from stormwater runoff by palustrine wetlands based on comprehensive budgets. Ecol. Eng. 1995, 4(2):77-97.
35. STATSGO2 U.S. General Soil Map (STATSGO2) 2006, Retrieved from:. http://soils.usda.gov/survey/geography/statsgo/.
36. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency Constructed Wetlands for Wastewater Treatment and Wildlife Habitat 1993, Retrieved from:. http://water.epa.gov/type/wetlands/upload/2004_10_25_wetlands_ConstructedWetlands-Complete.pdf.
37. U.S.Environmental Protection Agency National Water Quality Inventory. 2004 Report to Congress 2009, EPA 841-R-94-001. Retrieved from:. http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/guidance/cwa/305b/upload/2009_01_22_305b_2004report_2004_305Breport.pdf.
38. Wang X., Yang W., Melesse A.M. Using hydrologic equivalent wetland concept within SWAT to estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. T.ASABE 2008, 51:55-72.
39. Wang X., Shang S., Qu Z., Tingxi L., Melesse A.M., Yang W. Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. J.Environ. Manage. 2010, 91(7):1511-1525.
40. Weller M.W. Freshwater Marshes: Ecology and Wildlife Management 1994, University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis/London.
41. Wray R.D., Leatherman S.P., Nicholls R.J. Historic and future land loss for upland and marsh islands in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland, U.S.A. J.Coast. Res. 1995, 11(4):1195-1203. Retrieved from:. http://www.jstor.org/action/showPublicationInfo?journalCode=jcoasrese.
42. Wu K.S., Johnston C.A. Hydrologic comparison between a forested and a wetland/lake dominated watershed using SWAT. Hydrol. Process. 2008, 22:1431-1442.
43. Yang W., Wang X., Gabor T.S., Boychuk L., Badiou P. Water Quantity and Quality Benefits from Wetland Conservation and Restoration in the Broughton's Creek Watershed 2008, Ducks Unlimited Canada, Retrieved from:. http://www.ducks.ca/conserve/research/projects/broughtons/pdf/broughtons.pdf.
44. Yang W., Wang X., Liu Y., Gabor S., Boychuk L., Badiou P. Simulated environmental effects of wetland restoration scenarios in a typical Canadian prairie watershed. Wetlands Ecology Manage. 2010, 18:269-279.
45. Zhang L., Mitsch W.J. Modelling hydrological processes in created wetlands: an integrated system approach. Environ. Modell. Softw. 2005, 20(7):935-946.