Interpreting mosaicism in chorionic villi: Results of a monocentric series of 1001 mosaics in chorionic villi with follow-up amniocentesis

Prenatal Diagnosis

Volumn 35, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 1117-1127

  Malvestiti, Francesca ^a   Agrati, Cristina ^a   Grimi, Beatrice ^a   Pompilii, Eva ^a,b   Izzi, Claudia ^c   Martinoni, Lorenza ^a   Gaetani, Elisa ^a   Liuti, Maria Rosaria ^a   Trotta, Anna ^a   Maggi, Federico ^a   Simoni, Giuseppe ^a   Grati, Francesca Romana ^a  

^a TOMA Advanced Biomedical Assays SpA   (Italy)

^b Gynepro Private Clinic   (Italy)

^c SPEDALI CIVILI   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AMNIOCENTESIS; ARTICLE; CHORION VILLUS; CHORION VILLUS SAMPLING; CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; CHROMOSOME ANALYSIS; CHROMOSOME MOSAICISM; CONGENITAL HEART MALFORMATION; CYTOTROPHOBLAST; FETAL WELL BEING; FOLLOW UP; GENETIC COUNSELING; HUMAN; INCIDENCE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARKER CHROMOSOME; MONOSOMY X; POLYPLOIDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOMOTOR DEVELOPMENT; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; SEX CHROMOSOME ABERRATION; SHORT TANDEM REPEAT; TRISOMY; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY; AMNION FLUID; FEMALE; FETUS; GENETICS; KARYOTYPING; MESODERM; METABOLISM; MOSAICISM; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; TROPHOBLAST;

AMNIOCENTESIS; AMNIOTIC FLUID; CHORIONIC VILLI; CHORIONIC VILLI SAMPLING; FEMALE; FETUS; HUMANS; KARYOTYPING; MESODERM; MOSAICISM; PLACENTA; PREGNANCY; PRENATAL DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TRISOMY; TROPHOBLASTS; UNIPARENTAL DISOMY;

EID: 84945469308     PISSN: 01973851     EISSN: 10970223     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/pd.4656     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Vejerslev LO, Mikkelsen M. The European collaborative study on mosaicism in chorionic villus sampling: data from 1986 to 1987. Prenat Diagn 1989;9:575-88.
2. Ledbetter DH, Zachary JM, Simpson JL, et al. Cytogenetic results from the U.S. collaborative study on CVS. Prenat Diagn 1992;12:317-45.
3. Medical Research Council working party on the evaluation of chorionic villus sampling. Medical Research Council European trial of chorionic villus sampling. Lancet 1991;337:1491-99.
4. Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists Working Party on Chorionic Villi in Prenatal Diagnosis. Cytogenetic analysis of chorionic villi for prenatal diagnosis: an ACC collaborative study of UK data. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:363-79.
5. Wolstenholme J, Rooney DE, Davison EV. Confined placental mosaicism, IUGR, and adverse pregnancy outcome: a controlled retrospective UK collaborative survey. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:345-61.
6. Markert CL and Petters RM. Manufactured hexaparental mice show that adults are derived from three embryonic cells. Science 1978;202:56-8.
7. Engel E, DeLozier-Blanchet CD. Uniparental disomy, isodisomy, and imprinting: probable effects in man and strategies for their detection. Am J Med Genet 1991;40:432-9.
8. Spence JE, Perciaccante RG, Greig GM, et al. Uniparental disomy as a mechanism for human genetic disease. Am J Hum Genet 1988;42:217-26.
9. Robinson WP, Barret IJ, Bernard L, et al. Meiotic origin of trisomy in confined placentalmosaicism is correlated with presence of fetal uniparental disomy, high levels of trisomy in trophoblast, and increased risk of fetal intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Hum Genet 1997;60:917-27.
10. Kalousek DK. Mosaicism confined to chorionic tissue in human gestations. In First Trimester Fetal Diagnosis. Fraccaro M(ed). Berlin: Springer-Verlag 1985, pp. 130-6.
11. Simoni G, Fraccaro M. Does confined placental mosaicism affect the fetus? Hum Reprod 1992;7:139-40.
12. Simoni G, Sirchia SM. Confined placental mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:1185-9.
13. Daniel A, Wu Z, Darmanian A, et al. Issues arising from the prenatal diagnosis of some rare trisomy mosaics - the importance of cryptic fetal mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 2004;24:524-36.
14. Grati FR, Grimi B, Frascoli G, et al. Confirmation of mosaicism and uniparental disomy in amniocytes, after detection of mosaic chromosome abnormalities in chorionic villi. Eur J Hum Genet 2006;14:282-8.
15. Grati FR. Chromosomal mosaicism in human feto-placental development: implications for prenatal diagnosis. J Clin Med 2014;3:809-37.
16. Grati FR, Malvestiti F, Beatrice Grimi B, et al. QF-PCR as a substitute for karyotyping of cytotrophoblast for the analysis of chorionic villi: advantages and limitations from a cytogenetic retrospective audit of 44, 727 first-trimester prenatal diagnoses. Prenat Diagn 2013;33:1-7.
17. Linee guida per la diagnosi citogenetica Consensus. 2007 (www.sigu.net)
18. Specific Constitutional Cytogenetic Guidelines ECA July 2012 (www.e-c-a.eu)
19. Babu A, Verma RS. Human Chromosomes Principles and Techniques, 2nd ed. McGraw Hill: Texas, Tex, USA; 1995.
20. ISCN. An International Systemfor Human Cytogenetic Nomenclature. Shaffer LG, McGowan J, Schmid M (eds.). Basel: Karger S, 2013.
21. Kearney HM, Kearney JB, Conlin LK. Diagnostic implications of excessive homozygosity detected by SNP-based microarrays: consanguinity, uniparental disomy, and recessive single-gene mutations. Clin Lab Med 2011;31(4):595-613.
22. Dawson AJ, Chernos J, McGowan-Jordan J, et al. CCMG guidelines: prenatal and postnatal diagnostic testing for uniparental disomy. Clin Genet 2011;79(2):118-24.
23. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. Accuracy of cytogenetic findings on chorionic villus sampling (CVS)-diagnostic consequences of CVS mosaicism and non-mosaic discrepancy in centres contributing to EUCROMIC* 1986-1992. Prenat Diagn 1997;17:801-20.
24. Hahnemann JM, Vejerslev LO. European Collaborative Research on Mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC)-fetal and extrafetal cell lineages in 192 gestations with CVS mosaicism involving single autosomal trisomy. Am J Med Genet 1997;70:179-87.
25. Pittalis MC, Dalprà L, Torricelli F, et al. The predictive value of cytogenetic diagnosis after CVS based on 4860 cases with both direct and culture methods. Prenat Diagn 1994;14:267-78.
26. Battaglia P, Baroncini A, Mattarozzi A, et al. Cytogenetic follow-up of chromosomal mosaicism detected in first-trimester prenatal diagnosis. Prenat Diagn 2014;34:739-47.
27. Van den Berg C, Van Opstal D, Polak-Knook J, et al. (Potential) false-negative diagnoses in chorionic villi and a review of the literature. Prenat Diagn 2006;26(5):401-8.
28. Smith K, Lowther G, Maher E, et al. The predictive value of findings of the common aneuploidies, trisomies 13, 18 and 21, and numerical sex chromosome abnormalities at CVS: experience from the ACC U.K. Collaborative Study. Association of Clinical Cytogeneticists Prenatal Diagnosis Working Party. Prenat Diagn 1999;19(9):817-26.
29. Porter S, Wilson E, Tyler X, et al. A case of discordant related abnormal karyotypes from chorionic villi and amniocytes. Prenat Diagn 1999;19:887-90.
30. Morales C, Sánchez A, Bruguera J, et al. Cytogenetic study of spontaneous abortions using semi-direct analysis of chorionic villi samples detects the broadest spectrum of chromosome abnormalities. Am J Med Genet A 2008;146A(1):66-70.
31. Guerneri S, Bettio D, Simoni G, et al. Prevalence and distribution of chromosome abnormalities in a sample of first trimester internal abortion. Hum Rep 1987;2(8):735-39.
32. Kajii T, Ferrier A, Niikawa N, et al. Anatomic and chromosomal anomalies in 639 spontaneous abortuses. Hum Genet 1980;55:87-98.
33. Wolstenholme J. Confined placental mosaicism for trisomies 2, 3, 7, 8, 9, 16 and 22: their incidence, likely origins, and mechanisms for cell lineage compartimentalization. Prenat Diagn 1996;16:511-24.
34. Grati FR, Gomes DM, Ganesamoorthy D, et al. Application of a new molecular technique for the genetic evaluation of products of conception. Prenat Diagn 2013;33(1):32-41.
35. Hsu LY, Yu MT, Neu RL, et al. Rare trisomy mosaicism diagnosed in amniocytes, involving an autosome other than chromosomes 13, 18, 20, and 21: karyotype/phenotype correlations. Prenat Diagn 1997;17(3):201-42.
36. Gardner MRJ, Sutherland GR, Shaffer LG. Chromosome Abnormalities and Genetic Counseling. 4th edn: Oxford: New York; 2012.
37. Sago H, Chen E, Conte WJ, et al. True trisomy 2 mosaicism in amniocytes and newborn liver associated with multiple system abnormalities. Am J Med Genet 1997;72:343-46.
38. Sifakis S, Staboulidou I, Maiz N, et al. Outcome of pregnancies with trisomy 2 cells in chorionic villi. Prenat Diagn 2010;30:329-32.
39. Robert E, Dunlop J, Davis GS, et al. A further case a confined placental mosaicism for trisomy 2 associated with adverse pregnancy outcome. Prenat Diagn 2003;23:564-5.
40. Sachs ES, Jahoda MG, Los FJ, et al. Interpretation of 779 chromosome mosaicism and discrepancies in chorionic villi studies. Am J Med Genet 1990;37:268-27.
41. Kalousek DK, Langlois S, Robinson WP, et al. Trisomy 7 CVS mosaicism: pregnancy outcome; placental and DNA analysis 622 in 14 cases. Am J Med Genet 1996;65:348-52.
42. Marion JP, Fernhoff PM, Korotkin J, et al. Pre- and postnatal diagnosis of trisomy 4 mosaicism. Am J Med Genet 1990;37(3):362-5.
43. Brady AN, May KM, Fernhoff PM. Mosaic trisomy 4: Long-term outcome on the first reported liveborn. Am J Med Genet A 2005; 132A(4):411-3.
44. Zaslav AL, Blumenthal D, Willner JP, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of trisomy 4 mosaicism. Am J Med Genet 2000;95(4):381-4.
45. Wieczorek D, Prott EC, Robinson WP, et al. Prenatally detected trisomy 4 and 6 mosaicism--cytogenetic results and clinical phenotype. Prenat Diagn 2003;23(2):128-33.
46. Chen CP, Chern SR, Lee CC, et al. Clinical, cytogenetic, and molecular findings of prenatally diagnosed mosaic trisomy 4. Prenat Diagn 2004;24(1):38-44.
47. Gentile M, Volpe P, Cariola F, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of chromosome 4 mosaicism: prognostic role of cytogenetic, molecular, and ultrasound/MRI characterization. Am J Med Genet A 2005;136(1):66-70.
48. Kuchinka BD, Barrett IJ, Moya G, et al. Two cases of confined placental mosaicism for chromosome 4, including one with maternal uniparental disomy. Prenat Diagn 2001;21(1):36-9.
49. Van Allen MI, Ritchie S, Toi A, et al. Trisomy 4 in a fetus with cyclopia and other anomalies. Am J Med Genet 1993;46(2):193-7.
50. Van Haelst MM, Van Opstal D, Lindhout D, et al. Management of prenatally detected trisomy 8 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 2001;21(12):1075-8.
51. Malvestiti F, De Toffol S, Grimi B, et al. De novo small supernumerary marker chromosomes detected on 143, 000 consecutive prenatal diagnoses: chromosomal distribution, frequencies, and characterization combining molecular cytogenetics approaches. Prenat Diagn 2014;34(5):460-8.
52. Hsu LY, Yu MT, Richkind KE, et al. Incidence and significance of chromosome mosaicism involving an autosomal structural abnormality diagnosed prenatally through amniocentesis: a collaborative study. Prenat Diagn 1996;16(1):1-28.
53. Teyssier M, Gaucherand P, Buenerd A. Prenatal diagnosis of a tetraploid fetus. Prenat Diagn 1997;17(5):474-8.
54. Sharma A, Paliwal P, Dadhwal V, et al. Rare finding of 2n/4n mixoploidy in mother and fetus with severe immune hydrops. Cytogenet Genome Res 2009;124(1):90-3.
55. Noomen P, van den Berg C, de Ruyter JL, et al. Prevalence of tetraploid metaphases in semidirect and cultured chorionic villi. Fetal Diagn Ther 2001;16(3):129-32.
56. Liao J, Sathanoori M, Yatsenko SA, et al. Prenatal detection of del(10)(q11.2) mosaicism in chorionic villus specimens likely caused by a common chromosomal fragile site FRA10G is associated with a normal phenotype. Prenat Diagn 2012;32(12): 1166-9.
57. Opstal V, Van den Berg C, Deelen WH, et al. Prospective prenatal investigations on potential uniparental disomy in cases of confined placental trisomy. Prenat Diagn 1998;18(1):35-44.
58. Robinson WP, Bottani A, Yagang X, et al. Molecular, cytogenetic, and clinical investigations of Prader-Willi syndrome patients. Am J Hum Genet 1991;49:1219-34.
59. Christian SL, Smith AC, Macha M, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of uniparental disomy 15 following trisomy 15 mosaicism. Prenat Diagn 1996;16(4):323-32.
60. European Collaborative Research on Mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC). Trisomy 15 CPM: probable origins, pregnancy outcome and risk of fetal UPD: European Collaborative Research on Mosaicism in CVS (EUCROMIC). Prenat Diagn 1999;19(1):29-35.
61. Tjoa ML, Cindrova-Davies T, Spasic-Boskovic O, et al. Trophoblastic oxidative stress and the release of cell-free feto-placental DNA. Am J Pathol 2006;169:400-4.
62. Flori E, Doray B, Gautier E, et al. Circulating cell-free fetal DNA in maternal serum appears to originate from cyto- and syncytio-trophoblastic cells Case report. Hum Reprod 2004;19:723-24.
63. Bianchi DW, Wilkins-Haug L. Integration of noninvasive DNA testing for aneuploidy into prenatal care: what has happened since the rubber met the road? Clin Chem 2014;60:78-87.
64. Grati FR, Malvestiti F, Ferriera JC, et al. Fetoplacental mosaicism: potential implications for false-positive and false-negative noninvasive prenatal screening results. Genet Med 2014;16(8):620-4.