Forecasting the accuracy of genomic prediction with different selection targets in the training and prediction set as well as truncation selection

Theoretical and Applied Genetics

Volumn 128, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2189-2201

  Schopp, Pascal ^a   Riedelsheimer, Christian ^a   Utz, H Friedrich ^a   Schön, Chris Carolin ^b   Melchinger, Albrecht E ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOHENHEIM   (Germany)

^b TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GENES;

BREEDING PROGRAM; CROSS VALIDATION; GENETIC PARAMETERS; GENOMIC PREDICTIONS; HYBRID BREEDING; PREDICTION MODEL; PREDICTIVE ABILITIES; SUBSTANTIAL REDUCTION;

FORECASTING;

BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CROSS BREEDING; FORECASTING; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; MAIZE; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; PLANT GENOME; PROCEDURES; STATISTICAL MODEL;

CROSSES, GENETIC; FORECASTING; GENOME, PLANT; GENOMICS; GENOTYPE; LINEAR MODELS; LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; MODELS, GENETIC; PHENOTYPE; PLANT BREEDING; SELECTION, GENETIC; ZEA MAYS;

EID: 84945464728     PISSN: 00405752     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00122-015-2577-y     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Albrecht T, Wimmer V, Auinger H et al (2011) Genome-based prediction of testcross values in maize. Theor Appl Genet 123:339–350
2. Albrecht T, Auinger H-J, Wimmer V et al (2014) Genome-based prediction of maize hybrid performance across genetic groups, testers, locations, and years. Theor Appl Genet 127:1375–1386
3. Astle W, Balding DJ (2009) Population structure and cryptic relatedness in genetic association studies. Stat Sci 24:451–471
4. Bastiaansen JWM, Coster A, Calus MPL et al (2012) Long-term response to genomic selection: effects of estimation method and reference population structure for different genetic architectures. Genet Sel Evol 44:3
5. Bernardo R (2008) Molecular markers and selection for complex traits in plants: learning from the last 20 years. Crop Sci 48:1649–1664
6. Bernardo R, Yu J (2007) Prospects for genomewide selection for quantitative traits in maize. Crop Sci 47:1082–1090
7. Cochran WG (1950) Improvement by means of selection. In: Proceedings of second Berkeley symposium on mathematical statistics and probability, University of California Press, pp 449–470
8. Dekkers JCM (2007) Prediction of response to marker-assisted and genomic selection using selection index theory. Genetics 124:331–341
9. Eding H, Meuwissen T (2001) Marker-based estimates of between and within population kinships for the conservation of genetic diversity. J Anim Breed Genet 118:141–159
10. Endelman JB (2011) Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome 4:250–255
11. Falconer DS, Mackay TFC (1996) Introduction to quantitative genetics, 4th edn. Longmans Green, Harlow
12. Foiada F, Westermeier P, Kessel B, Ouzunova M, Wimmer V, Mayerhofer W, Presterl T, Dilger M, Kreps R, Eder J, Schön CC (2015) Improving resistance to the European corn borer: a comprehensive study in elite maize using QTL mapping and genome-wide prediction. Theor Appl Genet 128:875–891
13. Ganal MW, Durstewitz G, Polley A et al (2011) A large maize (Zea mays L.) SNP genotyping array: development and germplasm genotyping, and genetic mapping to compare with the B73 reference genome. PLoS One 6:e28334
14. Gilmour A, Gogel B, Cullis B, Thompson R (2009) ASReml user guide release 3.0. VSN International Ltd, Hemel Hempstead
15. Grieder C, Dhillon BS, Schipprack W, Melchinger AE (2012a) Breeding maize as biogas substrate in Central Europe: I. Quantitative-genetic parameters for testcross performance. Theor Appl Genet 124:971–980
16. Grieder C, Dhillon BS, Schipprack W, Melchinger AE (2012b) Breeding maize as biogas substrate in Central Europe: II. Quantitative-genetic parameters for inbred lines and correlations with testcross performance. Theor Appl Genet 124:981–988
17. Habier D, Fernando RL, Dekkers JCM (2007) The impact of genetic relationship information on genome-assisted breeding values. Genetics 177:2389–2397
18. Habier D, Tetens J, Seefried F et al (2010) The impact of genetic relationship information on genomic breeding values in German Holstein cattle. Genet Sel Evol 42:5
19. Habier D, Fernando RL, Garrick DJ (2013) Genomic BLUP decoded: a look into the black box of genomic prediction. Genetics 194:597–607
20. Hallauer AR (1990) Methods used in developing maize inbreds. Maydica 35:1–16
21. Heffner EL, Sorrells ME, Jannink J-L (2009) Genomic selection for crop improvement. Crop Sci 49:1–12
22. Hill WG, Robertson A (1968) Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theor Appl Genet 38:226–231
23. Jannink J-L (2010) Dynamics of long-term genomic selection. Genet Sel Evol 42:35
24. Jannink J-L, Lorenz AJ, Iwata H (2010) Genomic selection in plant breeding: from theory to practice. Brief Funct Genomics Proteomics 9:166–177
25. Jensen J, Su G, Madsen P (2012) Partitioning additive genetic variance into genomic and remaining polygenic components for complex traits in dairy cattle. BMC Genet 13:44
26. Lamkey KR, Schnicker BJ, Melchinger AE (1995) Epistasis in an elite maize hybrid and choice of generation for inbred line development. Crop Sci 35:1272–1281
27. Lande R, Thompson R (1990) Efficiency of marker-assisted selection in the improvement of quantitative traits. Genetics 124:743–756
28. Lehermeier C, Krämer N, Bauer E et al (2014) Usefulness of multi-parental populations of maize (Zea mays L.) for genome-based prediction. Genetics 198:3–16
29. Massman JM, Gordillo A, Lorenzana RE, Bernardo R (2013) Genomewide predictions from maize single-cross data. Theor Appl Genet 126:13–22
30. Melchinger AE, Utz H, Schön C-C (1998) Quantitative trait locus (QTL) mapping using different testers and independent population samples in maize reveals low power of QTL detection and large bias in. Genetics 149:383–403
31. Meuwissen THE, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME (2001) Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics 157:1819–1829
32. Mi X, Utz HF, Technow F, Melchinger AE (2014) Optimizing resource allocation for multistage selection in plant breeding with r package. Crop Sci 54:1413–1418
33. Mihaljevic R, Schön C-C, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2005a) Correlations and QTL correspondence between line per se and testcross performance for agronomic traits in four populations of European maize. Crop Sci 45:114–122
34. Mihaljevic R, Utz HF, Melchinger AE (2005b) No evidence for epistasis in hybrid and per se performance of elite European flint maize inbreeds from generation means and QTL analyses. Crop Sci 45:2605–2613
35. Muir WM (2007) Comparison of genomic and traditional BLUP-estimated breeding value accuracy and selection response under alternative trait and genomic parameters. J Anim Breed Genet 124:342–355
36. Reif JC, Gumpert F-M, Fischer S, Melchinger AE (2007) Impact of interpopulation divergence on additive and dominance variance in hybrid populations. Genetics 176:1931–1934
37. Riedelsheimer C, Melchinger AE (2013) Optimizing the allocation of resources for genomic selection in one breeding cycle. Theor Appl Genet 126:2835–2848
38. Riedelsheimer C, Czedik-Eysenberg A, Grieder C et al (2012) Genomic and metabolic prediction of complex heterotic traits in hybrid maize. Nat Genet 44:217–220
39. Riedelsheimer C, Endelman JB, Stange M et al (2013) Genomic predictability of interconnected bi-parental maize populations. Genetics 194:493–503
40. Schön C-C, Utz H, Groh S et al (2004) Quantitative trait locus mapping based on resampling in a vast maize testcross experiment and its relevance to quantitative genetics for complex traits. Genetics 498:485–498
41. Smith O (1986) Covariance between line per se and testcross performance. Crop Sci 2:540–543
42. Technow F, Riedelsheimer C, Schrag T, Melchinger AE (2012) Genomic prediction of hybrid performance in maize with models incorporating dominance and population specific marker effects. Theor Appl Genet 125:1181–1194
43. Technow F, Bürger A, Melchinger AE (2013) Genomic prediction of northern corn leaf blight resistance in maize with combined or separated training sets for heterotic groups. G3 3:197–203
44. Technow F, Schrag T, Schipprack W et al (2014) Genome properties and prospects of genomic prediction of hybrid performance in a breeding program of maize. Genetics. doi:10.1534/genetics.114.165860
45. Utz H (1969) Mehrstufenselektion in der Pflanzenzüchtung. Dissertation Thesis, University of Hohenheim
46. Utz H (2005) PLABSTAT—a computer program for statistical analysis of plant breeding experiments. University of Hohenheim, Stuttgart
47. VanRaden PM (2008) Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci 91:4414–4423
48. Windhausen VS, Atlin GN, Hickey JM et al (2012) Effectiveness of genomic prediction of maize hybrid performance in different breeding populations and environments. G3 2:1427–1436
49. Wray NR, Yang J, Hayes BJ et al (2013) Pitfalls of predicting complex traits from SNPs. Nat Rev Genet 14:507–515
50. Zhao Y, Gowda M, Liu W et al (2012) Accuracy of genomic selection in European maize elite breeding populations. Theor Appl Genet 124:769–776