A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing effectiveness of two nasal continuous positive airway pressure devices in very-low-birth-weight infants

Pediatric Critical Care Medicine

Volumn 13, Issue 2, 2012, Pages 191-196

  Bober, Klaudiusz ^a   Świetliński, Janusz ^b   Zejda, Jan ^a   Kornacka, Katarzyna ^c   Pawlik, Dorota ^d   Behrendt, Jakub ^a   Gajewska, Elzbieta ^e   Czewska, Małgorzata ^e   Korbal, Piotr ^f   Witalis, Janusz ^g   Walas, Wojciech ^h   Wilińska, Maria ⁱ   Turzańska, Agnieszka ⁱ   Zieliński, Grzegorz ^j   Czeszyńska, Beata ^k   Bachman, Thomas ^l  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SILESIA   (Poland)

^b CHILDREN'S MEMORIAL HEALTH INSTITUTE   (Poland)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF WARSAW   (Poland)

^d JAGIELLONIAN UNIVERSITY MEDICAL COLLEGE   (Poland)

^e WROCLAW MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^f Neonatal Intensive Care Unit   (Poland)

^g Regional Hospital Rzeszow   (Poland)

^h Regional Hospital   (Poland)

ⁱ MEDICAL CENTER FOR POSTGRADUATE EDUCATION   (Poland)

^j Regional Hospital   (Poland)

^k POMERANIAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Poland)

^l Mountains Community Hospital   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

clinical study; infant; Infant Flow; nasal continuous positive pressure ventilation; noninvasive ventilation; randomized controlled trial

Indexed keywords

BETAMETHASONE; PORACTANT;

ARTICLE; BRAIN HEMORRHAGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORTICOSTEROID THERAPY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; GESTATIONAL AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; LEUKOMALACIA; LUNG DYSPLASIA; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; NECROTIZING ENTEROCOLITIS; NOSE INJURY; PATENT DUCTUS ARTERIOSUS; PNEUMOTHORAX; POLAND; POSITIVE END EXPIRATORY PRESSURE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME; RETROLENTAL FIBROPLASIA; SINGLE DRUG DOSE; TERTIARY HEALTH CARE; TREATMENT FAILURE; VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; WEANING;

CONTINUOUS POSITIVE AIRWAY PRESSURE; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; INFANT, NEWBORN; INFANT, PREMATURE; INFANT, VERY LOW BIRTH WEIGHT; MALE; POLAND; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RESPIRATORY DISTRESS SYNDROME, NEWBORN; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84858295887     PISSN: 15297535     EISSN: 19473893     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0b013e3182231882     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Bohlin K, Jonsson B, Gustafsson AS, et al: Continuous positive airway pressure and surfactant. Neonatology 2008; 93:309-315 (Pubitemid 351799115)
2. Gregory GA, Kitterman JA, Phibbs RH, et al: Treatment of the idiopathic respiratory distress syndrome with continuous positive airway pressure. N Engl J Med 1971; 284: 1333-1340
3. Horbar JD, Badger GJ, Carpenter JH, et al: Trends in mortality and morbidity for very low birth weight infants 1991-1999. Pediatrics 2002; 110:143-151 (Pubitemid 34742654)
4. Bachman TE, Marks NE, Rimensberger PC: Factors effecting adoption of new neonatal and pediatric respiratory technologies. Intensive Care Med 2008; 34:174-178
5. Nowadzky T, Pantoja A, Brton JR: Bubble continuous positive airway pressure, a potentially better practice, reduces the use of mechanical ventilation among very low birth weight infants with respiratory distress syndrome. Pediatrics 2009; 123:1534-1540
6. Świetliński J, Bober K, Gajewska E, et al: Introduction of Infant Flow nasal continuous airway pressure as the standard of practice in Poland: The initial 2-year experience. Pediatr Crit Care Med 2007; 8:109-114 (Pubitemid 46568560)
7. Davis PG, Henderson-Smart DJ: Nasal continuous positive airways pressure immediately after extubation for preventing morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003; 2:CD000143
8. Finer NN, Carlo WA; on behalf of the SUPPORT Subcommittee: Early CPAP versus surfactant in extremely preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2010; 362:1970-1979
9. Morley CJ, Davis PG, Doyle LW, et al: Nasal CPAP or intubation at birth for very preterm infants. N Engl J Med 2008; 358:700-708 (Pubitemid 351240749)
10. Yong SC, Chen SJ, Boo NY: Incidence of nasal trauma associated with nasal prong versus nasal mask during continuous positive airway pressure treatment in very low birthweight infants: A randomised control study. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 2005; 90:F480-F483
11. Robertson NJ, McCarthy LS, Hamilton PA, et al: Nasal deformities resulting from flow driver continuous positive airway pressure. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1996; 75: F209
12. Pandit PB, Courtney SE, Pyon KH, et al: Work of breathing during constant and variable- flow nasal continuous positive airway pressure in preterm neonates. Pediatrics 2001; 108:682-685 (Pubitemid 32786598)
13. Stefanescu BM, Murphy WP, Hansell BJ, et al: A randomized, controlled trial comparing two different continuous positive airway pressure systems for the successful extubation of extremely low birth weight infants. Pediatrics 2003; 112:1031-1038 (Pubitemid 37339553)
14. Sun SC, Tien HC, Banabas S: Randomized controlled trial of two methods of nasal CPAP (NCPAP): Flow driver versus conventional CPAP. Pediatr Res 1999; 45:322A
15. Roukema H, O'Brian K, Nesbitt K: A crossover trial of Infant Flow (IF) continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) versus nasopharyngeal (NP) CPAP in the extubation of babies <1250 grams birth weight. Pediatr Res 1999; 45:318A
16. De Paoli AG, Davis PG, Faber B, et al: Devices and pressure sources for administration of nasal continuous positive airway pressure (NCPAP) in preterm neonates. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002; 4:CD002977
17. Świetliński J, Bachman T, Gajewska E, et al: Factors affecting outcomes in very low birth weight infants treated electively with nasal continuous positive airway pressure. J Perinatol 2010; 30:112-117
18. Lagercrantz A: Does CPAP work when it really matters? Acta Paediatr 2007; 96:481
19. Subramaniam P, Henderson-Smart DJ, Davis PG: Prophylactic nasal continuous positive airways pressure for preventing morbidity and mortality in very preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005; 3:CD001243