Part 2: Evidence evaluation and management of conflicts of interest: 2015 international consensus on cardiopulmonary resuscitation and emergency cardiovascular care science with treatment recommendations

Circulation

Volumn 132, Issue , 2015, Pages S40-S50

  Morley, Peter T ^a   Lang, Eddy ^a   Aickin, Richard ^a   Billi, John E ^a   Eigel, Brian ^a   Ferrer, Jose Maria E ^a   Finn, Judith C ^a   Gent, Lana M ^a   Griffin, Russell E ^a   Hazinski, Mary Fran ^a   Maconochie, Ian K ^a   Montgomery, William H ^a   Morrison, Laurie J ^a   Nadkarni, Vinay M ^a   Nikolaou, Nikolaos I ^a   Nolan, Jerry P ^a   Perkins, Gavin D ^a   Sayre, Michael R ^a   Travers, Andrew H ^a   Wyllie, Jonathan ^a   Zideman, David A ^a   more..

^a NONE

Author keywords

Cardiac arrest; Conflict of interest; Evidence evaluation; Resuscitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; CONSENSUS DEVELOPMENT; EMERGENCY CARE; HUMAN; MEDICAL SOCIETY; MEDICAL SPECIALIST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLISHING; RESUSCITATION; RETURN OF SPONTANEOUS CIRCULATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; CONSENSUS; EMERGENCY; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HEART ARREST; METHODOLOGY; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; PROCEDURES; STANDARDS; STATISTICAL BIAS;

BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; CONSENSUS; EMERGENCIES; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HEART ARREST; HUMANS; OBSERVATIONAL STUDIES AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN;

EID: 84945313252     PISSN: 00097322     EISSN: 15244539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1161/CIR.0000000000000271     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Morley PT. Evidence evaluation worksheets: the systematic reviews for the evidence evaluation process for the 2010 International Consensus on Resuscitation Science. Resuscitation. 2009;80:719-721. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.003.
2. Morley PT, Atkins DL, Billi JE, Bossaert L, Callaway CW, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Eigel B, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Koster RW, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni VM, Nolan JP, O'Connor RE, Perlman JM, Sayre MR, Semenko TI, Shuster M, Soar J, Wyllie J, Zideman D. Part 3: evidence evaluation process: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122(Suppl 2):S283-S290. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970947.
3. Morley PT, Atkins DL, Billi JE, Bossaert L, Callaway CW, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Eigel B, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Koster RW, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morrison LJ, Nadkarni VM, Nolan JP, O'Connor RE, Perlman JM, Sayre MR, Semenko TI, Shuster M, Soar J, Wyllie J, Zideman D. Part 3: evidence evaluation process: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2010;81 Suppl 1:e32-e40. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.023.
4. Institute of Medicine. Standards for Systematic Reviews. 2011. http:// www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Finding-What-Works-in-Health-Care-Standards-for-Systematic-Reviews/Standards.aspx. Accessed May 6, 2015.
5. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. GRADE Handbook. 2013. http://www.guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook/. Accessed May 6, 2015.
6. Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, Kunz R, Vist G, Brozek J, Norris S, Falck- Ytter Y, Glasziou P, DeBeer H, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Meerpohl J, Dahm P, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:383-394. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.04.026.
7. GRADE Working Group. Organizations that have endorsed or that are using GRADE. 2015. http://www.gradeworkinggroup.org/society/index.htm. Accessed May 10, 2015.
8. American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). GRADE Presentations: SEERS Presentation Library. https://volunteer.heart.org/apps/pico/Pages/ILCOR-GRADE-Presentations.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2015.
9. O'Connor D, Green S, Higgins J, eds. Chapter 5: Defining the review questions and developing criteria for including studies. In: The Cochrane Collaboration. Higgins J, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed May 6, 2015.
10. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Atkins D, Brozek J, Vist G, Alderson P, Glasziou P, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:395-400. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.09.012.
11. Higgins JPT, Altman DG, Sterne J, eds. Chapter 8.5: The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias. In: The Cochrane Collaboration. Higgins J, Green, S, eds. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0. 2011. http://handbook.cochrane.org/. Accessed May 6, 2015.
12. Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman A. 5.2.1 Study limitations (risk of bias). In: GRADE Handbook. 2013. http://www.guidelinedevelopment.org/handbook/#h.m9385o5z3li7. Accessed May 6, 2015.
13. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Montori V, Akl EA, Djulbegovic B, Falck-Ytter Y, Norris SL, Williams JW Jr, Atkins D, Meerpohl J, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence-study limitations (risk of bias). J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407-415. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017.
14. Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, Mallett S, Deeks JJ, Reitsma JB, Leeflang MM, Sterne JA, Bossuyt PM; QUADAS-2 Group. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529-536. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009.
15. Vandvik PO, Santesso N, Akl EA, You J, Mulla S, Spencer FA, Johnston BC, Brozek J, Kreis J, Brandt L, Zhou Q, Schünemann HJ, Guyatt G. Formatting modifications in GRADE evidence profiles improved guideline panelists comprehension and accessibility to information. A randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2012;65:748-755. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.013.
16. Evidence Prime Inc. GRADEpro Guideline Development Tool. http:// www.guidelinedevelopment.org/. Accessed May 6, 2015.
17. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Vist GE, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Norris S, Guyatt GH. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:401-406. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015.
18. Schünemann HJ, Schünemann AH, Oxman AD, Brozek J, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Kunz R, Craig J, Montori VM, Bossuyt P, Guyatt GH; GRADE Working Group. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies. BMJ. 2008;336:1106-1110. doi: 10.1136/bmj.39500.677199.AE.
19. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Glasziou P, Jaeschke R, Akl EA, Norris S, Vist G, Dahm P, Shukla VK, Higgins J, Falck-Ytter Y, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency.J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1294-1302. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.03.017.
20. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Woodcock J, Brozek J, Helfand M, Alonso-Coello P, Falck-Ytter Y, Jaeschke R, Vist G, Akl EA, Post PN, Norris S, Meerpohl J, Shukla VK, Nasser M, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1303-1310. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.04.014.
21. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Rind D, Devereaux PJ, Montori VM, Freyschuss B, Vist G, Jaeschke R, Williams JW Jr, Murad MH, Sinclair D, Falck-Ytter Y, Meerpohl J, Whittington C, Thorlund K, Andrews J, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1283-1293. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.012.
22. Hopewell S, McDonald S, Clarke M, Egger M. Grey literature in metaanalyses of randomized trials of health care interventions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007:MR000010.
23. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, Vist G, Kunz R, Brozek J, Alonso-Coello P, Djulbegovic B, Atkins D, Falck-Ytter Y, Williams JW Jr, Meerpohl J, Norris SL, Akl EA, Schünemann HJ. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1277-1282. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.01.011.
24. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, Glasziou P, Akl EA, Alonso-Coello P, Atkins D, Kunz R, Brozek J, Montori V, Jaeschke R, Rind D, Dahm P, Meerpohl J, Vist G, Berliner E, Norris S, Falck-Ytter Y, Murad MH, Schünemann HJ; GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1311-1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004.
25. Rücker G, Schumacher M. Simpson's paradox visualized: the example of the rosiglitazone meta-analysis. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:34. doi: 10.1186/1471-2288-8-34.
26. Sharpe D. Of apples and oranges, file drawers and garbage: why validity issues in meta-analysis will not go away. Clin Psychol Rev. 1997;17:881-901.
27. Shea BJ, Hamel C, Wells GA, Bouter LM, Kristjansson E, Grimshaw J, Henry DA, Boers M. AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:1013-1020. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2008.10.009.
28. Andrews JC, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Pottie K, Meerpohl JJ, Coello PA, Rind D, Montori VM, Brito JP, Norris S, Elbarbary M, Post P, Nasser M, Shukla V, Jaeschke R, Brozek J, Djulbegovic B, Guyatt G. GRADE guidelines: 15. Going from evidence to recommendation-determinants of a recommendation's direction and strength. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:726-735. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.02.003.
29. American Heart Association, American Stroke Association, International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). ILCOR Scientific Evidence Evaluation and Review System (SEERS). 2015. https://volunteer.heart.org/apps/pico/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed May 10, 2015.
30. Iorio A, Spencer FA, Falavigna M, Alba C, Lang E, Burnand B, McGinn T, Hayden J, Williams K, Shea B, Wolff R, Kujpers T, Perel P, Vandvik PO, Glasziou P, Schunemann H, Guyatt G. Use of GRADE for assessment of evidence about prognosis: rating confidence in estimates of event rates in broad categories of patients. BMJ. 2015;350:h870.
31. Alexander PE, Bero L, Montori VM, Brito JP, Stoltzfus R, Djulbegovic B, Neumann I, Rave S, Guyatt G. World Health Organization recommendations are often strong based on low confidence in effect estimates. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:629-634. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2013.09.020.
32. Billi JE, Shuster M, Bossaert L, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Eigel B, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Koster RW, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Munoz H, Nadkarni VM, Nolan JP, O'Connor RE, Perlman JM, Richmond S, Sayre MR, Soar J, Wyllie J, Zideman D; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; American Heart Association. Part 4: conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations. Circulation. 2010;122(Suppl 2):S291-S297. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.970962.
33. Shuster M, Billi JE, Bossaert L, de Caen AR, Deakin CD, Eigel B, Hazinski MF, Hickey RW, Jacobs I, Kleinman ME, Koster RW, Mancini ME, Montgomery WH, Morley PT, Morrison LJ, Munoz H, Nadkarni VM, Nolan JP, O'Connor RE, Perlman JM, Richmond S, Sayre MR, Soar J, Wyllie J, Zideman D; International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation; American Heart Association. Part 4: conflict of interest management before, during, and after the 2010 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2010;81 Suppl 1:e41-e47. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2010.08.024.