Evidence evaluation worksheets: The systematic reviews for the evidence evaluation process for the 2010 International Consensus on Resuscitation Science

Resuscitation

Volumn 80, Issue 7, 2009, Pages 719-721

  Morley, Peter Thomas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL PROTOCOL; CONFLICT OF INTEREST; DATA BASE; EDITORIAL; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; METHODOLOGY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLICATION; RESUSCITATION; STANDARDIZATION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

CONSENSUS; HUMANS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESUSCITATION; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC;

EID: 67349085091     PISSN: 03009572     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2009.05.003     Document Type: Editorial

References (14)

1. Chamberlain D.A., and Cummins R.O. Advisory statements of the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). Resuscitation 34 (1997) 99-100
2. Anon. In this issue. Resuscitation. 2000; 47:99-100.
3. Proceedings of the 2005 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations. Resuscitation. 2005; 67:157-341.
4. Yeung J., Edleson D., Gao F., Soar J., and Perkins G. The use of CPR feedback/prompt devices during training and CPR performance: a systematic review. Resuscitation 80 (2009) 743-751
5. Moher D., Cook D.J., Eastwood S., Olkin I., Rennie D., and Stroup D.F. Improving the quality of reports of meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials: the QUOROM statement. Quality of Reporting of Meta-analyses. Lancet 354 (1999) 1896-1900
6. The Cochrane Collaboration. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://www.cochrane.org/.
7. International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation: Filling Out The Worksheet.doc. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com:80/societyimages/ilcor/Filling%20Out%20The%20Worksheet.doc.
8. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Asking focussed questions. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1036.
9. International Liaison Committee On Resuscitation: Defining Levels of Evidence.doc. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com:80/societyimages/ilcor/Defining%20Levels%20of%20Evidence.doc.
10. International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation: Defining Quality of Evidence.doc. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://mc.manuscriptcentral.com:80/societyimages/ilcor/Defining%20Quality%20of%20Evidence.doc.
11. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ). Systems to Rate the Strength of Scientific Evidence. Evidence Report/Technology Assessment: Number 47; 2002. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://www.ahrq.gov/clinic/epcsums/strengthsum.htm.
12. Atkins D., Eccles M., Flottorp S., et al. Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations. I. Critical appraisal of existing approaches The GRADE Working Group. BMC Health Serv Res 4 (2004) 38
13. Centre for Evidence Based Medicine. Critical appraisal. Accessed 12 May 2009, at http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=1157.
14. American Heart Association. Gateway to C2010. Your Guide to the International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR). Accessed 12 May 2009, at www.americanheart.org/ILCOR.