Performance of recycled plastic waste modified asphalt binder in Saudi Arabia

International Journal of Pavement Engineering

Volumn 18, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 349-357

  Dalhat, M A ^a   Al Abdul Wahhab, H I ^a  

^a KING FAHD UNIVERSITY OF PETROLEUM AND MINERALS   (Saudi Arabia)

Author keywords

asphalt; performance; plastic wastes; polyethylene; polypropylene; Recycling

Indexed keywords

BINDERS; BINS; BLENDING; BOTTLES; DESIGN; HIGH DENSITY POLYETHYLENES; PAVEMENTS; PLASTIC BOTTLES; POLYETHYLENES; POLYPROPYLENES; RECYCLING; VISCOELASTICITY;

FATIGUE PERFORMANCE; INDUSTRIAL PACKAGING; KINGDOM OF SAUDI ARABIA; MECHANISTIC-EMPIRICAL PAVEMENT DESIGN GUIDES; MODIFIED ASPHALT BINDERS; PERFORMANCE; PLASTIC WASTES; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES;

ASPHALT;

EID: 84945237153     PISSN: 10298436     EISSN: 1477268X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10298436.2015.1088150     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. AASHTO M 332, 2014. Standard specification for performance-graded asphalt binder using multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Washington, DC:American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
2. AASHTO T 315, 2012. Standard method of test for determining the rheological properties of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC:American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
3. AASHTO TP 70, 2013. Standard method of test for multiple stress creep recovery (MSCR) test of asphalt binder using a dynamic shear rheometer (DSR). Washington, DC:American Association of State and Highway Transportation Officials.
4. ASTM D4402/D4402M, 2013. Standard test method for viscosity determination of asphalt at elevated temperatures using a rotational viscometer. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM International. doi:10.1520/D4402_D4402 M
5. ASTM D2872, 2012. Standard test method for effect of heat and air on a moving film of asphalt (Rolling thin-film oven test). West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM International. doi:10.1520/D2872-12E01
6. ASTM D7369, 2011. Standard test method for determining the resilient modulus of bituminous mixtures by indirect tension test. West Conshohocken, PA:ASTM International. doi:10.1520/D7369-11
7. Ahmadinia, E., et al., 2012. Performance evaluation of utilization of waste polyethylene terephthalate (PET) in stone mastic asphalt. Construction and Building Materials, 36, 984–989.10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2012.06.015
8. Al-Abdul Wahhab, H.I., et al., 1995. Adaptation of SHRP performance based binder specifications to the gulf countries. Proceedings of the 4th Saudi engineering conference, KAU.
9. Casey, D., et al., 2008. Development of a recycled polymer modified binder for use in stone mastic asphalt. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52 (10), 1167–1174.10.1016/j.resconrec.2008.06.002
10. Fang, C., et al., 2013. Aging properties and mechanism of the modified asphalt by packaging waste polyethylene and waste rubber powder. Polymers for Advanced Technologies, 24 (1), 51–55.10.1002/pat.3048
11. Fang, C., et al., 2012. Combined modification of asphalt with polyethylene packaging waste and organophilic montmorillonite. Polymer Testing, 31 (2), 276–281.10.1016/j.polymertesting.2011.11.008
12. Fang, C., et al., 2009. UV-aging resistance of packaging waste pe modified asphalts. Polymer-Plastics Technology and Engineering, 48 (9), 945–949.10.1080/03602550902995059
13. Hafeez, I., and Kamal, M., 2014. Creep compliance:a parameter to predict rut performance of asphalt binders and mixtures. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, 39 (8), 5971–5978.10.1007/s13369-014-1216-2
14. Ho, S., et al., 2006. Study of recycled polyethylene materials as asphalt modifiers. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 33 (8), 968–981.10.1139/l06-044
15. Huang, Y., Bird, R.N., and Heidrich, O., 2007. A review of the use of recycled solid waste materials in asphalt pavements. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52 (1), 58–73.10.1016/j.resconrec.2007.02.002
16. Li, Q., et al., 2011. Mechanistic-empirical pavement design guide (MEPDG):a bird’s-eye view. Journal of Modern Transportation, 19 (2), 114–133.10.1007/BF03325749
17. Navarro, F.J., et al., 2009. Bitumen modification with reactive and non-reactive (virgin and recycled) polymers:a comparative analysis. Journal of Industrial and Engineering Chemistry, 15 (4), 458–464.10.1016/j.jiec.2009.01.003
18. Punith, V., and Veeraragavan, A., 2011. Behavior of reclaimed polyethylene modified asphalt cement for paving purposes. Journal of Materials in Civil Engineering, 23 (6), 833–845.10.1061/(ASCE)MT.1943-5533.0000235
19. Rahman, F., et al., 2006. Catalytic processing of waste plastics with/without petroleum resid—an economic evaluation. Energy Sources, Part A:Recovery, Utilization, and Environmental Effects, 28 (15), 1353–1363.10.1080/15567030600819973
20. Singh, B., et al., 2013. Polymer-modified bitumen of recycled LDPE and maleated bitumen. Journal of Applied Polymer Science, 127 (1), 67–78.10.1002/app.36810
21. Yildirim, Y., Hazlett, D., and Davio, R., 2004. Toner-modified asphalt demonstration projects. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 42 (3), 295–308.10.1016/j.resconrec.2004.04.008
22. Zafar, S., 2013. Solid waste management in Saudi Arabia. EcoMena Articles. Available from:http://www.ecomena.org/solid-waste-management-in-saudi-arabia/