Creep Compliance: A Parameter to Predict Rut Performance of Asphalt Binders and Mixtures

Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering

Volumn 39, Issue 8, 2014, Pages 5971-5978

  Hafeez, Imran ^a   Kamal, Mumtaz Ahmed ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ENGINEERING AND TECHNOLOGY   (Pakistan)

Author keywords

Asphalt binders; Creep compliance; Polymer modified asphalt; Rut depth

Indexed keywords

EID: 84904864194     PISSN: 2193567X     EISSN: 21914281     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13369-014-1216-2     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Anderson, D. A.; Christensen, D. W.; Bahia, H. U.; Dongre, R.; Sharma, M. G.; Antle, C. E.; Button, J.: Binder Characterization and Evaluation: Physical Characterization). SHRP Report No. A-369. National Research Council, Washington, DC, (1994).
2. Leahy, R. B.; Cramer, S. B.: Superpave Binder Implementation-Oregon DOT. Report No. FHWA-OR-RD-99-16, Oregon State University Corvallis, Oregon (1999).
3. Yusoff N., Hainin M., Airey G.: "A comparative study of phase angle predictive equations using bituminous binder data." Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 37(6), 1571-1583 (2012).
4. Mohammad, A. A.; Omar, H.: Rheological properties of crumb rubber-modified bitumen containing antioxidant. Arabian J. Sci. Eng. 34(1), 3-12 (2009).
5. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Standard Specification for Performance Graded Asphalt Binder. AASHTO designation: M 320, Washington, DC, (2008).
6. ASTM D2872. Standard Test Method for Effect of Heat and Air on a Moving Film of Asphalt (Rolling thing film oven test)." American Society for Testing Materials, Washington, DC, (2012).
7. Jahromi S. G., Khodaii A.: "Empirical model for determining rutting parameter in rubber modified bitumen." Int. J. Civil Eng. 6(4), 246-254 (2008).
8. Shenoy, A.: Refinement of the superpave specification parameter for performance grading of asphalt. J. Transp. Eng. 127(5), 357-362 (2001).
9. D'Angelo, J.; Dongre, R.: Superpave binder specifications and their performance relationship to modified binders. In: Proceedings of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, pp. 91-103 (2002).
10. Bahia, H. U.; Hanson, D. I.; Zeng, M.; Zhai, H.; Khatri, M. A.; Anderson, R. M.: Characterization of modified asphalt binders in superpave mix design. NCHRP Report 459, Transportation Research Board, National Research Council, Washington, DC, (2001).
11. Marasteanu, M. O.; Clyne, T.; McGraw, J.; Li, XJ.; Velasquez, R.: High-temperature rheological properties of asphalt binders. Transp. Res. Rec. 1901, 52-59 (2005).
12. Hrdlicka, G. M.; Tandon, V.; Prozzi, J.; Smit, A.; Yildrim, Y.: Evaluation of binder tests for identifying rutting and cracking potential of modified asphalt binders. Guidelines for selecting asphalt mixtures and evaluation of polymer-modified mixes. Research Report 0-4824-1, Center for Transportation Infrastructure Systems. The University of Texas at El Paso, Texas, (2007).
13. Bahia, H.; Tabatabaee, N.; Clopotel, C.; Golalipour, A.: Evaluation of the MSCR test for modified binders' specification. In: 56th Annual Conference of Canadian Technical Asphalt Association, Quebec, (2011).
14. Clopotel C. S., Bahia H. U.: "Importance of elastic recovery in the DSR for binders and mastics." Eng. J. 16(4), 99-106 (2012).
15. Nguyen, D. T.; Nedjar, B. E.; Tamagny, P.: Cyclic elasto-visco-plastic model for asphalt concrete materials. J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 8(2), 239-255 (2007).
16. Huang, X.; Zhang, Y.: A new creep test method for asphalt mixtures. J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 11(4), 969-991 (2010).
17. Wasage, T. L. J.; Stastna, J.; Zanzotto, L.: Rheological analysis of multi-stress creep recovery (MSCR) test. Int. J. Pavement Eng. 12(6), 561-568 (2011).
18. Hafeez, I.; Kamal, M. A.; Mirza, M. W.; Khanzada S.: Investigating the effects of maximum size of aggregate on rutting potential of stone mastic asphalt. Pak. J. Eng. Appl. Sci. 10, 89-96 (2012).
19. Stuart, K. D.; Mogawer, W. S.: Modified asphalt binder in mixtures topical report: permanent deformation of mixes with Diabase aggregate. NCHRP Report No. FHWA-RD-02-042, Federal Highway Administration, (2002).
20. AASHTO T49. Standard Method of Test for Penetration of Bituminous Materials. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, (2007).
21. Ahmed, M. I.: An experimental study on linear visco elastic behavior of asphalt binders under creep test. M. Sc. Thesis. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Engineering and Technology, Taxila, Pakistan, (2012).
22. AASHTO TP70. Standard Practice for Multiple Stress Creep Recovery Test of Asphalt Binder Using a Dynamic Shear Rheometer." American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials, Washington DC, (2010).
23. Marasteanu, M. O.; Anderson, D. A.: Establishing linear viscoelastic conditions for asphalt binders. Transportation Research Record; J. Transp. Res. Board. 1728, 1-6 (2000).
24. Lakes, R. S.: Viscoelastic Materials. Cambridge University Press, 1st Edition, New York, (2009).
25. Wasage, T. L. J.; Statsna, J.; Zhonzott, L.: Repeated loading and unloading tests of asphalt binders and mixes. J. Road Mater. Pavement Des. 11(3), 725-744 (2010).
26. D'Angelo, J.: Development in Asphalt Binder Specifications, Research Circular E-C147. Characteristics of Bituminous Materials Committee, Transportation Research Board, Washington DC, (2010).
27. Asphalt Institute. "Superpave Mix Design". Superpave Series No. 2, Asphalt Institute. Lexington, KY, (2001).