Changes in use of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods among U.S. Women, 2009-2012

Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 917-927

  Kavanaugh, Megan L ^a   Jerman, Jenna ^a   Finer, Lawrence B ^a  

^a GUTTMACHER INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTRACEPTIVE AGENT; DRUG IMPLANT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE BEHAVIOR; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDY; ETHNIC GROUP; FEMALE; HEALTH INSURANCE; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HORMONAL CONTRACEPTION; HUMAN; INCOME; INTERVIEW; INTRAUTERINE CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICE; LONG ACTING REVERSIBLE CONTRACEPTIVE; MEDICAL HISTORY; NULLIPARA; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PARITY; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POVERTY; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SEXUALITY; DRUG IMPLANT; TRENDS; UNITED STATES; UTILIZATION; YOUNG ADULT;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CONTRACEPTION; CONTRACEPTIVE AGENTS, FEMALE; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; DRUG IMPLANTS; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAUTERINE DEVICES; UNITED STATES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84945128495     PISSN: 00297844     EISSN: 1873233X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001094     Document Type: Review

References (26)

1. Hatcher R, Trussell J, Nelson A, Cates W. Contraceptive technology. Atlanta (GA): Bridging the Gap Communications; 2011.
2. Finer LB, Jerman J, Kavanaugh ML. Changes in use of long-acting contraceptive methods in the United States, 2007-2009. Fertil Steril 2012;98:893-7.
3. Secura G. Long-acting reversible contraception: a practical solution to reduce unintended pregnancy. Minerva Ginecol 2013;65:271-7.
4. Gold RB. Guarding against coercion while ensuring access: a delicate balance. Guttmacher Policy Rev 2014;17:8-14.
5. Gomez AM, Fuentes L, Allina A. Women or LARC first? Reproductive autonomy and the promotion of long-acting reversible contraceptive methods. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:171-5.
6. Higgins JA. Celebration meets caution: LARC's boons, potential busts, and the benefits of a reproductive justice approach. Contraception 2014;89:237-41.
7. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and National Center for Health Statistics. Public use data file documentation: 2011-2013, National Survey of Family Growth User's Guide. Hyattsville (MD): HHS; 2014.
8. Finer LB, Zolna MR. Shifts in intended and unintended pregnancies in the United States, 2001-2008. Am J Public Health 2014;104(suppl 1):S43-8.
9. Long-acting reversible contraception: implants and intrauter-ine devices. Practice Bulletin No. 121. American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2011;118: 184-96.
10. Kavanaugh ML, Frohwirth L, Jerman J, Popkin R, Ethier K. Long-acting reversible contraception for adolescents and young adults: patient and provider perspectives. J Pediatr Adolesc Gynecol 2013;26:86-95.
11. McNicholas C, Madden T, Secura G, Peipert JF. The contraceptive CHOICE project round up: what we did and what we learned. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2014;57:635-43.
12. Biggs MA, Rocca CH, Brindis CD, Hirsch H, Grossman D. Did increasing the use of highly effective contraception contribute to declining abortions in Iowa? Contraception 2015;91:167-73.
13. Postlethwaite D, Trussell J, Zoolakis A, Shabear R, Petitti D. A comparison of contraceptive procurement pre-and post-benefit change. Contraception 2007;76:360-5.
14. Ricketts S, Klingler G, Schwalberg R. Game change in Colorado: widespread use of long-acting reversible contraceptives and rapid decline in births among young, low-income women. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2014;46:125-32.
15. Dehlendorf C, Foster DG, de Bocanegra HT, Brindis C, Bradsberry M, Darney P. Race, ethnicity, and differences in contraception among low-income women: methods received by Family PACT Clients, California, 2001-2007. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2011;43:181-7.
16. Downing RA, LaVeist TA, Bullock HE. Intersections of ethnicity and social class in provider advice regarding reproductive health. Am J Public Health 2007;97:1803-7.
17. Frost JJ, Lindberg LD, Finer LB. Young adults' contraceptive knowledge, norms, and attitudes: associations with risk of unintended pregnancy. Perspect Sex Reprod Health 2012; 44:107-16.
18. Gordon L. Woman's body, woman's right: a social history of birth control in America. New York (NY): Penguin; 1990.
19. Roberts D. Killing the black body: race, reproduction, and the meaning of liberty. New York (NY): Vintage; 1998.
20. National Women's Law. State of birth control coverage: health plan violations of the Affordable Care Act. Washington, DC: National Women's Law Center; 2015. p. 1-34.
21. Division of Medical Services. South Dakota Medicaid: family planning billing manual. Pierre (SD): Department of Social Services; 2015.
22. Salganicoff A, Ranji U, Beamesderfer A, Kurani N. Women and health care in the early years of the ACA: key findings from the 2013 Kaiser Women's Health Survey. Menlo Park (CA): The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation; 2014.
23. Committee on Adolescence, American Academy of Pediatrics. Contraception for adolescents. Pediatrics 2014; 134: e1244-56.
24. Rosenstock JR, Peipert JF, Madden T, Zhao Q, Secura GM. Continuation of reversible contraception in teenagers and young women. Obstet Gynecol 2012;120:1298-305.
25. Sonfield A, Tapales A, Jones RK, Finer LB. The impact of the federal contraceptive coverage guarantee on out-of-pocket payments for contraceptives: 2014 update. Contraception 2015;91:44-8.
26. Kost K. Unintended pregnancy rates at the state level: estimates for 2010 and trends since 2002. New York (NY): Guttmacher Institute; 2015.