Lessons learned from U.S. experience with regional landscape governance: Implications for conservation and protected areas

Nature Policies and Landscape Policies: Towards an Alliance

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 323-330

  Laven, Daniel ^a   Mitchell, Nora J ^b   Jewiss, Jennifer ^b   Barrett, Brenda ^c  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

^c Living Landscape Observer   (United States)

Author keywords

Evaluation research case studies; Governance; Networks; Regional landscape conservation

Indexed keywords

EID: 84945124821     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-05410-0_37     Document Type: Chapter

References (27)

1. Alliance of National Heritage Areas (2013) National Park Service evaluations find national heritage areas are achieving their purpose and accomplishing their goals. Available via http://www.nationalheritageareas.us/pdf/Final-NHA.pdf. Accessed 20 Nov 2013
2. Barrett B, Mitchell N (eds) (2003) Stewardship of heritage areas. Thematic issue of The George Wright Forum 20(2):1-88
3. Bogason P, Musso JA (2006) The democratic prospects of network governance. Am Rev Public Adm 36:3-18
4. Brown J, Mitchell N, Beresford M (eds) (2005) The protected landscape approach: linking nature, culture and community.IUCN
5. Gland Copping S, Huffman P, Laven D, Mitchell N, Tuxill J (2006) Connecting stories, landscapes, and people: Exploring the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor partnership.USNPS Conservation Study Institute.
6. Woodstock Dudley N (ed) (2008) Guidelines for applying protected areas management categories. IUCN, Gland
7. Gunderson LH, Holling CS (eds) (2002) Panarchy: understanding transformations in human and natural systems. Island Press, Washington, DC
8. Innes JE, Booher DE (2003) Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. In: Hajer M, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis: understanding governance in the network society. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK, pp 33-59
9. Jewiss J (2007) A qualitative evaluation of the partnership system of the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network. Report submitted to the Chesapeake Bay Gateways and Watertrails Network
10. Annapolis Jewiss J, Laven D, Mitchell N, Huffman P (2008) Development of a National Heritage Area evaluation strategy: report on phase 1. USNPS Conservation Study Institute, Woodstock, VT in cooperation with the USNPS National Heritage Areas Office and the Alliance of National Heritage Areas
11. Jones M, Stenseke M (eds) (2011) The European landscape conventions: challenges of participation. Springer
12. Dordrecht Kothari A, Camill P, Brown J (2013) Conservation as if people also mattered: policy and practice of community-based conservation. Conserv Soc 11(1):1-15
13. Laven D (2006) Evaluating national heritage areas: theory, methods, and application. Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont
14. Burlington Laven D, Jewiss J, Mitchell N (2013) Toward landscape-scale stewardship and development: a theoretical framework of United States national heritage areas. Soc Nat Resour 26(7):762-777
15. Laven DN, Krymkowski DH, Ventriss CL, Manning RE, Mitchell NJ (2010a) From partnerships to networks: new approaches for evaluating US National Heritage Area effectiveness. Eval Rev 34:271-298
16. Laven D, Ventriss C, Manning R, Mitchell N (2010b) Evaluating US national heritage areas: theory, methods, and application. Environ Manag 46:195-212
17. Mandell MP (1984) Application of social network analysis to the implementation of complex project. Hum Relat 37:659-679
18. Mc Kinney M, Johnson S (2013) Large landscape conservation in the rocky Mountain West: an inventory and status report. University of Montana
19. Missoula Mitchell N, Rossler M, Tricaud PM (2009) World heritage cultural landscapes: a handbook for conservation and management (World heritage papers 26). UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris
20. Mose I (ed) (2007) Protected areas and regional development in Europe: towards a new model for the 21st century. Ashgate Publishing, Aldershot, pp 3-20
21. Provan KG, Milward HB (2001) Do networks really work: a framework for evaluating public-sector organizational networks. Publ Admin Rev 61:414-423
22. Rands MR, Adams WM, Bennun L, Butchart SH, Clements A, Coomes D, Vira B et al (2010) Biodiversity conservation: challenges beyond 2010. Science 32(5997):1298-1303
23. Regional Plan Association (2012) Landscapes: improving conservation practice in the Northeast Megaregion. Available via http://www.rpa.org/library/pdf/RPA-Northeast-Landscapes.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2013
24. Rossler M, Mitchell N (2005) Landscapes linkages without boundaries? In: World Heritage reports 16. UNESCO World Heritage Centre, Paris, pp 23-26
25. Thompson JD, Mathevet R, Delanoe O, Gil-Fourrier C, Bonnin M, Cheylan M (2011) Ecological solidarity as a conceptual tool for rethinking ecological and social interdependence in conservation policy for protected areas and their surrounding landscape. C R Biol 334(5):412-419
26. Tuxill J, Huffman P, Laven D, Mitchell N (2008) Shared legacies in Cane River National Heritage Area: linking people, traditions, and culture.
27. USNPS Conservation Study Institute, Woodstock Tuxill J, Mitchell N, Huffman P, Laven D, Copping S, Gifford G (2005) Reflecting on the past, looking to the future: sustainability study report. USNPS Conservation Study Institute, Woodstock USNPS National Heritage Areas (n.d.) Available viahttp://www.cr.nps.gov/heritageareas/htm. Accessed 5 Nov 2013