Toward Landscape-Scale Stewardship and Development: A Theoretical Framework of United States National Heritage Areas

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2013, Pages 762-777

  Laven, Daniel N ^a,b   Jewiss, Jennifer L ^c   Mitchell, Nora J ^c  

^a MID SWEDEN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

^c UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT   (United States)

Author keywords

evaluation research; heritage areas; landscape; stewardship

Indexed keywords

HERITAGE CONSERVATION; LANDSCAPE; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PUBLIC-PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP; RESEARCH; THEORETICAL STUDY;

UNITED STATES;

EID: 84878506949     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920.2012.723304     Document Type: Article

References (63)

1. American Evaluation Association. (2004). Guiding principles for evaluators. http://www.eval.org/Publications/GuidingPrinciples.asp (accessed 19 October 2011).
2. Barrett, B. 2003. Roots for the family tree. George Wright For. 20: 41 - 49.
3. Barrett, B., and N. Mitchell, eds. 2003. Stewardship of heritage areas. George Wright For. 20.
4. Belcher, E. H., and J. D. Wellman. 1991. Confronting the challenge of greenline parks: Limits of the traditional administrative approach. Environ. Manage. 15: 321 - 328.
5. Billington, R. 2004. Federal leverage attracts private investment at US heritage sites: A case study. Int. J. Heritage Stud. 10: 349 - 359.
6. Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor. 1989. Cultural heritage and land management plan for the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor. Woonsocket, RI: Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor.
7. Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor. 1998. The next ten years: An amendment to the cultural heritage and land management plan for the Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor. Woonsocket, RI: Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor.
8. Brick, P., D. Snow, and S. van de Wetering, eds. 2001. Across the great divide: Explorations in collaborative conservation and the American West. Washington, DC: Island Press.
9. Brown, J., N. Mitchell, and M. Beresford, eds. 2005. The protected landscape approach: Linking nature, culture and community. Cambridge, UK: IUCN.
10. Coffey, A., and P. Atkinson. 1996. Making sense of qualitative data: Complementary research designs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
11. Copping, S., P. Huffman, D. Laven, N. Mitchell, and J. Tuxill. 2006. Connecting stories, landscapes, and people: Exploring the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor partnership. Sustainability study Report. A technical assistance project for the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor Commission and the Delaware & Lehigh National Heritage Corridor, Inc. Woodstock, VT: USNPS Conservation Study Institute.
12. Council of Europe. 2000. European Landscape Convention. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/176.htm (accessed 9 September 2011).
13. Council of Europe. 2011. European Landscape Convention, CETS No.:176. Available at http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/Commun/ChercheSig.asp?NT=176&CM=8&DF=&CL=ENG (accessed 9 September 2011).
14. Eugster, G. 2003. Evolution of the heritage areas movement. George Wright For. 20: 50 - 59.
15. Funnell, S. C., and P. J. Rogers. 2011. Purposeful program theory: Effective use of theories of change and logic models. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
16. Gates, L., and N. I. M. Morgan. 2003. Report from the field: The whole is so much more than the sum of its parts. George Wright For. 20: 60 - 67.
17. Hamin, E. M. 2001. The US National Park Service's partnership parks: Collaborative responses to middle landscapes. Land Use Policy 18: 123 - 135.
18. Hugh Moore Historical Park and Museums. 1991. Historic resources study: Delaware and Lehigh Canal National Heritage Corridor. Easton, PA: Delaware and Lehigh National Heritage Corridor.
19. Jewiss, J., D. Laven, N. Mitchell, and P. Huffman. 2008. Development of a National Heritage Area evaluation strategy: Report on phase I: A technical assistance report for the NPS National Heritage Areas Office. Woodstock, VT: Conservation Study Institute in cooperation with the NPS National Heritage Areas Office and the Alliance of National Heritage Areas.
20. Jones, M., and M. Stenseke, eds. 2011. The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of participation. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
21. Knight, R. L., and P. B. Landres, eds. 1998. Stewardship across boundaries. Washington, DC: Island Press.
22. Kumar, N., L. W. Stern, and J. C. Anderson. 1993. Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Acad. Manage. J. 36: 1633 - 1651.
23. Landres, P. B. 1998. Integration: A beginning for landscape-scale stewardship. In Stewardship across boundaries, ed. R. L. Knight and P. B. Landres, 337 - 345. Washington, DC: Island Press.
24. Laven, D. 2006. Evaluating National Heritage Areas: Theory, methods, and application. Burlington, VT: Doctoral dissertation, University of Vermont.
25. Laven, D. N., D. H. Krymkowski, C. L. Ventriss, R. E. Manning, and N. J. Mitchell. 2010. From partnerships to networks: New approaches for evaluating US National Heritage Area effectiveness. Evaluation Rev. 34: 271 - 298.
26. Laven, D., N. Mitchell, and D. Wang, eds. 2005. Conservation at the landscape scale. George Wright For. 22: 1.
27. Laven, D., C. Ventriss, R. Manning, and N. Mitchell. 2010. Evaluating US National Heritage Areas: Theory, methods, and application. Environ. Manage. 46: 195 - 212.
28. Lew, A. A., and C. M. Hall. 1998. The geography of sustainable tourism: Lessons and prospects. In Sustainable tourism: A geographical perspective, ed. C. M. Hall and A. A. Lew, 199 - 203. Harlow, UK: Prentice Hall.
29. Little, C. 1975. Greenline parks: An approach to preserving recreational landscapes in urban settings. Report to the Environmental Policy Division, Congressional Research Service. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.
30. Mason, R. J. 1994. The greenlining of America: Managing private lands for public purposes. Land Use Policy 11: 208 - 221.
31. Maxwell, J. A. 2005. Qualitative research design: An interactive approach, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
32. McKinney, M., and S. Johnson. 2009. Working across boundaries: People, nature, and regions. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
33. McKinney, M., L. Scarlett, and D. Kemmis. 2010. Large landscape conservation: A strategic framework for policy and action. Cambridge, MA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy.
34. Miles, M., and A. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative data analysis: An expanded source book. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
35. Minteer, B. 2003. Regional planning as pragmatic conservationism. In Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground, ed. B. Minteer and R. Manning, 93 - 113. Washington, DC: Island Press.
36. Minteer, B., and R. Manning, eds. 2003. Reconstructing conservation: Finding common ground. Washington, DC: Island Press.
37. Mitchell, N., M. Rössler, and P. M. Tricaud, eds. 2009. World heritage cultural landscapes: A handbook for conservation and management (world heritage paper 26). Paris, France: UNESCO World Heritage Centre.
38. Morrison, T. H., G. T. McDonald, and M. B. Lane. 2004. Integrating natural resource management for better environmental outcomes. Austr. Geographer 35: 243 - 258.
39. National Parks Second Century Commission. 2009. Advancing the national park idea: National Parks Second Century Commission report. Washington, DC: National Parks Conservation Association.
40. National Park Service. 2011a. National heritage areas office website. http://www.nps.gov/history/heritageareas (accessed 30 August 2011).
41. National Park Service. 2011b. Cane river national heritage area website. www.nps.gov/crha/index.htm (accessed 30 August 2011).
42. National Park Service. 2012. Policy memorandum 12-01 (A5623), Subject: National Heritage Areas Program. Issued 14 March. http://www.nps.gov/heritageareas/NHA%20Policy%20Memo.pdf (accessed 16 August 2012).
43. National Park System Advisory Board. 2006. Charting a future for national heritage areas. Washington, DC: National Park System Advisory Board.
44. Ottoson, J. M., and P. Hawe, eds. 2009. Knowledge utilization, diffusion, implementation, transfer, and translation: Implications for evaluation. New Directions for Evaluation 2009(124):1-108.
45. Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research and evaluation methods, 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
46. Patton, M. Q. 2008. Utilization-focused evaluation, 4th ed. Los Angeles, CA: Sage.
47. Patton, M. Q. 2011. Developmental evaluation: Applying complexity concepts to enhance innovation and use. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
48. Phillips, A. 2002. Management guidelines for IUCN Category V protected areas protected landscapes/seascapes: World Commission on Protected Areas best practice protected area guidelines series no. 9. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.
49. Phillips, A. 2003. Turning ideas on their head: The new paradigm for protected areas. George Wright For. 20: 8 - 32.
50. Selin, S. 2004. Natural resource partnerships. In Society and natural resources: A summary of knowledge: Prepared for the 10th international symposium on society and resource management, ed. M. J. Manfredo, J. J. Vaske, B. L. Bruyere, D. R. Field, and P. J. Brown, 137-146. Jefferson, MO: Modern Litho.
51. Shadie, P., and D. Sheppard. 2004. Towards a new paradigm of protected areas in the 21st century. In Global challenges of parks and protected area management, ed. I. Camarda, M. Manfredo, F. Mulas, and T. Teel, 439 - 452. Sassari, Italy: Delfino.
52. Stake, R. E. 1995. The art of case study research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
53. Stake, R. E. 2010. Qualitative research: Studying how things work. New York, NY: Guilford.
54. Stenseke, M., and M. Jones. 2011. Conclusion: benefits, difficulties, and challenges of participation under the European Landscape Convention. In The European Landscape Convention: Challenges of participation, ed. M. Jones and M. Stenseke, 295 - 309. Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer.
55. Tuxill, J., P. Huffman, D. Laven, and N. Mitchell. 2008. Shared legacies in Cane River National Heritage Area: Linking people, traditions, and culture. A technical assistance report for the Cane River National Heritage Area Corridor Commission. Woodstock, VT: USNPS Conservation Study Institute.
56. Tuxill, J., N. Mitchell, P. Huffman, D. Laven, S. Copping, and G. Gifford. 2005. Reflecting on the past, looking to the future: Sustainability study report. A technical assistance report to the John H. Chaffee Blackstone River Valley National Heritage Corridor Commission. Woodstock, VT: USNPS Conservation Study Institute.
57. United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. 2011. Preliminary study on the technical and legal aspects relating to the desirability of a new international standard-setting instrument on landscape. UNESCO Executive Board, 186 EX/21. http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0019/001917/191720e.pdf
58. U.S. Department of the Interior. 2011. Treasured landscapes: Departmental highlights. http://www.doi.gov/budget/appropriations/2011/highlights/upload/Treasured-Landscapes.pdf (accessed 16 August 2012).
59. Weiss, C. 1998. Evaluation, 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
60. Wondolleck, J., and S. Yaffee. 2000. Making collaboration work: Lessons learned from innovation in natural resource management. Washington, DC: Island Press.
61. Wylie, J. 2007. Landscape. London, UK: Routledge.
62. Yin, R. K. 2008. Case study research: Design and methods, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
63. Zube, E. H. 1995. Greenways and the US national park system. Landscape Urban Plan. 33: 17 - 25.