Enabling or Cultivating? The Role of Prostate Cancer Patients’ Received Partner Support and Self-Efficacy in the Maintenance of Pelvic Floor Exercise Following Tumor Surgery

Annals of Behavioral Medicine

Volumn 50, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 247-258

  Hohl, Diana Hilda ^a   Knoll, Nina ^a   Wiedemann, Amelie ^a   Keller, Jan ^a   Scholz, Urte ^b   Schrader, Mark ^c   Burkert, Silke ^d  

^a FREIE UNIVERSITÄT BERLIN   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^c HELIOS KLINIKUM BERLIN BUCH   (Germany)

^d CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

Author keywords

Cultivation hypothesis; Enabling hypothesis; Pelvic floor exercise; Prostate cancer; Received social support; Self efficacy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PELVIS FLOOR; PROCEDURES; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; PSYCHOLOGY; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF CONCEPT; SEXUALITY; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPOUSE; THEORETICAL MODEL; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

ADULT; AGED; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, THEORETICAL; PELVIC FLOOR; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; SELF EFFICACY; SEXUAL PARTNERS; SOCIAL SUPPORT; SPOUSES; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; URINARY INCONTINENCE;

EID: 84944930122     PISSN: 08836612     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s12160-015-9748-6     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R, et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: Sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer. 2015; 136: E359-E386.
2. Bill-Axelson A, Holmberg L, Garmo H, et al. Radical prostatectomy or watchful waiting in early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2014; 370: 932-942.
3. Resendes LA, McCorkle R. Spousal responses to prostate cancer: An integrative review. Cancer Invest. 2006; 24: 192-198.
4. Resnick MJ, Koyama T, Fan KH, et al. Long-term functional outcomes after treatment for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2013; 368: 436-445.
5. Dorey G, Glazener C, Buckley B, Cochran C, Moore K. Developing a pelvic floor muscle training regimen for use in a trial intervention. Physiotherapy. 2009; 95: 199-208.
6. Burkert S, Knoll N, Luszczynska A, Gralla O. The interplay of dyadic and individual planning of pelvic-floor exercise in prostate-cancer patients following radical prostatectomy. J Behav Med. 2012; 35: 305-317.
7. Burkert S, Knoll N, Scholz U, Roigas J, Gralla O. Self-regulation following prostatectomy: Phase-specific self-efficacy beliefs for pelvic-floor exercise. Br J Health Psychol. 2012; 17: 273-293.
8. Sacomori C, Cardoso FL, Porto IP, Negri NB. The development and psychometric evaluation of a self-efficacy scale for practicing pelvic floor exercises. Braz J Phys Ther. 2013; 17: 336-342.
9. Khan CM, Iida M, Stephens MAP, et al. Spousal support following knee surgery: Roles of self-efficacy and perceived emotional responsiveness. Rehabil Psychol. 2009; 54: 28-32.
10. Benight CC, Bandura A. Social cognitive theory of posttraumatic recovery: The role of perceived self-efficacy. Behav Res Ther. 2004; 42: 1129-1148.
11. Schwarzer R, Knoll N. Functional roles of social support within the stress and coping process: A theoretical and empirical overview. Int J Psychol. 2007; 42: 243-252.
12. Berkman LF, Glass T, Brissette I, Seeman TE. From social integration to health: Durkheim in the new millennium. Soc Sci Med. 2000; 51: 843-857.
13. Dunkel-Schetter C, Blasband DE, Feinstein LG, Herbert TB. Elements of supportive interactions: When are attempts to help effective? In: Spacapan S, Oskamp S, eds. Helping and being helped: Naturalistic studies. Newbury Park: Sage Publications; 1992: 83-114.
14. Giangrasso B, Casale S. Psychometric properties of the Medical Outcome Study Social Support Survey with a general population sample of undergraduate students. Soc Indic Res. 2014; 116: 185-197.
15. Holt-Lunstad J, Smith TB, Layton JB. Social relationships and mortality risk: A meta-analytic review. PLoS Med. 2010; 7: 1-20.
16. DiMatteo MR. Social support and patient adherence to medical treatment: A meta-analysis. Health Psychol. 2004; 23: 207-218.
17. Ochsner S, Knoll N, Stadler G, et al. Interacting effects of receiving social control and social support during smoking cessation. Ann Behav Med. 2015; 49: 141-146.
18. Hogan BE, Linden W, Najarian B. Social support interventions: Do they work? Clin Psychol Rev. 2002; 22: 381-440.
19. Bandura A. Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman; 1997.
20. Bastone EC, Kerns RD. Effects of self-efficacy and perceived social support on recovery-related behaviors after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Ann Behav Med. 1995; 17: 324-330.
21. Schwarzer R. Modeling health behavior change: How to predict and modify the adoption and maintenance of health behaviors. Appl Psychol-Int Rev. 2008; 57: 1-29.
22. Ernsting A, Knoll N, Schneider M, Schwarzer R. The enabling effect of social support on vaccination uptake via self-efficacy and planning. Psychol Health Med. 2014; 20: 239-246.
23. Schwarzer R, Dunkel-Schetter C, Weiner B, Woo G. Expectancies as mediators between recipient characteristics and social support intentions. In: Schwarzer R, ed. Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington: Hemisphere; 1992: 65-87.
24. Shoji K, Bock J, Cieslak R, et al. Cultivating secondary traumatic growth among healthcare workers: The role of social support and self-efficacy. J Clin Psychol. 2014; 70: 831-846.
25. Knoll N, Wiedemann AU, Schultze M, Schrader M, Heckhausen J. Prostate cancer patients gradually advance goals for rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy: Applying a lines-of-defense model to rehabilitation. Psychol Aging. 2014; 29: 787-792.
26. Knoll N, Wiedemann AU, Schrader M, et al. Calibrating independence goals and partner support: Couples adjust to functional limitations after tumor surgery. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2015; 7: 167-187.
27. Keller J, Burkert S, Wiedemann AU, et al. Individual and dyadic planning predicting pelvic floor exercise among prostate cancer survivors. Rehabil Psychol. 2015; 60: 222-231.
28. Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. 5th ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2007.
29. Burkert S, Scholz U, Gralla O, Roigas J, Knoll N. Dyadic planning of health-behavior change after prostatectomy: A randomized-controlled planning intervention. Soc Sci Med. 2011; 73: 783-792.
30. Schulz U, Schwarzer R. Social support in coping with illness: The Berlin Social Support Scales (BSSS). Diagnostica. 2003; 49: 73-82.
31. Wiedemann AU, Lippke S, Reuter T, et al. Prediction of stage transitions in fruit and vegetable intake. Health Educ Res. 2009; 24: 596-607.
32. Hautzinger M. Die CES-D Skala: Ein Depressionsmessinstrument für Untersuchungen in der Allgemeinbevölkerung [The CES-D Scale: A self-report depression scale for research in the general population]. Diagnostica. 1988; 34: 167-173.
33. Karantanis E, Fynes M, Moore K, Stanton S. Comparison of the ICIQ-SF and 24-hour pad test with other measures for evaluating the severity of urodynamic stress incontinence. Int Urogynecol J. 2004; 15: 111-116.
34. Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-2012.
35. Geiser C. Data analysis with Mplus. New York: Guilford Press; 2012.
36. Cole DA, Maxwell SE. Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Questions and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. J Abnorm Psychol. 2003; 112: 558-577.
37. Muthén LK, Muthén BO: Chi-square difference testing using the Satorra-Bentler scaled chi-square. Available at http://www.statmodel.com/. Accessibility verified March 01, 2015.
38. Hu L, Bentler PM. Evaluating model fit. In: Hoyle RH, ed. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 1995: 76-99.
39. MacKinnon DP, Lockwood CM, Williams J. Confidence limits for the indirect effect: Distribution of the product and resampling methods. Multivar Behav Res. 2004; 39: 99-128.
40. Gray RE, Fitch M, Phillips C, Labrecque M, Fergus K. Managing the impact of illness: The experiences of men with prostate cancer and their spouses. J Health Psychol. 2000; 5: 531-548.
41. Bolger N, Amarel D. Effects of social support visibility on adjustment to stress: Experimental evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2007; 92: 458-475.
42. Lüscher J, Stadler G, Ochsner S, et al. Daily negative affect and smoking after a self-set quit attempt: The role of dyadic invisible social support in a daily diary study. Br J Health Psychol. 2015.
43. Kuijer RG, Buunk BP, Ybema JF. Justice of give-and-take in the intimate relationship: When one partner of a couple is diagnosed with cancer. Pers Relat. 2001; 8: 75-92.
44. Scholz U, Ochsner S, Hornung R, Knoll N. Does social support really help to eat a low-fat diet? Main effects and gender differences of received social support within the health action process approach. Appl Psychol Health Well Being. 2013; 5: 270-290.