Training on the use of a bespoke continuing professional development framework improves the quality of CPD records

International Journal of Clinical Pharmacy

Volumn 37, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 1250-1257

  Donyai, Parastou ^a   Alexander, Angela M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Comparative effectiveness research; Continuing professional development (CPD); Credentialing; Pharmacy; United Kingdom

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PARALLEL DESIGN; PHARMACIST; PHARMACY TECHNICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT; TOTAL QUALITY MANAGEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WORK EXPERIENCE; BEHAVIOR; DOUBLE BLIND PROCEDURE; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; GREAT BRITAIN; LEARNING; PROGRAM EVALUATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA;

BEHAVIOR; DOUBLE-BLIND METHOD; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, PHARMACY, CONTINUING; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LEARNING; PHARMACISTS; PHARMACISTS' AIDES; PROGRAM EVALUATION;

EID: 84944754820     PISSN: 22107703     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11096-015-0202-4     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Department of Health. The white paper trust, assurance and safety: the regulation of health professionals. In: Crown (ed) Department of Health, 2007. ISBN 9780101701327.
2. General Medical Council. The good medical practice framework for appraisal and revalidation. General Medical Council (2011). p 8. http://www.gmc-uk.org/GMP_framework_for_appraisal_and_revalidation.pdf_41326960.pdf.
3. General Dental Council. Continuing professional development (CPD) for dental care professionals. London: General Dental Council. (2011) p 20. https://www.gdcuk.org/Newsandpublications/Publications/Publications/ContinuingProfessionalDevelopmentforDentalProfessionals.pdf.
4. Hasman A. Get ready for revalidation in pharmacy. Pharm J. 2009;283:486.
5. International Pharmaceutical Federation. FIP statement of professional standards: continuing professional development. The Netherlands: International Pharmaceutical Federation. 2002. p 4. http://www.fip.org/www/uploads/database_file.php?id=221&table_id=.
6. Royal pharmaceutical society of Great Britain. Plan and record for pharmacists and pharmacy technicians. 2009. http://www.uptodate.org.uk/PlanandRecord/version4/PlanandRecordVersion14CompleteGuidancePack.pdf.
7. Executive agency for health and consumers. Study concerning the review and mapping of continuous professional development and lifelong learning for health professionals in the EU. 2013. p 448. http://ec.europa.eu/health/workforce/docs/cpd_mapping_report_en.pdf.
8. International Pharmaceutical Federation. Continuing professional development/continuing education in pharmacy: global report. The Netherlands: International Pharmaceutical Federation. 2014. p 46. http://www.fip.org/files/fip/PharmacyEducation/CPD_CE_report/FIP_2014_Global_Report_CPD_CE_online_version.pdf.
9. Pharmacy Council of New Zealand. Recertification framework and guidelines. 2012. p 15. http://www.pharmacycouncil.org.nz/cms_show_download.php?id=295.
10. General Pharmaceutical Council. Standards for continuing professional development. 2010. p 5. http://www.pharmacyregulation.org/sites/default/files/Standards%20for%20continuing%20professional%20development%20s.pdf.
11. Donyai P, Herbert RZ, Denicolo PM, Alexander AM. British pharmacy professionals’ beliefs and participation in continuing professional development: a review of the literature. Int J Pharm Pract. 2011;19:290–317.
12. Thompson W, Nissen LM. Australian pharmacists’ understanding of their continuing professional development obligations. J Pharm Pract Res. 2013;43:213–7.
13. Anonymous. Draft future standards for the pharmacy profession have been published for consultation. Pharm J. 2009;283:435.
14. Donyai P, Alexander AM, Denicolo PM. A framework for assessing continuing professional development activities for satisfying pharmacy revalidation requirements. J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2013;33:127–35.
15. McConnell KJ, Newlon CL, Delate T. The impact of continuing professional development versus traditional continuing pharmacy education on pharmacy practice. Ann Pharmacother. 2010;44:1585–95.
16. Burgess S,Natalie LeBlanc N, Rainkie D, Roels C, Louie S. Are standardized knowledge assessment exams the best way to assess a pharmacist’s competence and should they be a mandatory component of licence renewal?. Can J Hosp Pharm. 2014;67(4):304–7.
17. Biggs J. Teaching for quality learning at University. Buckingham: SRHE and Open University; 2003. ISBN 0-335-21168-2.
18. Kostrzewski AJ, Dhillon S, Goodsman D, Taylor KM. The influence of continuing professional development portfolio records on pharmacy practice. Int J Pharm Pract. 2009;17:107–13.
19. Schafheutle EI, Hassell K, Noyce PR. Ensuring continuing fitness to practice in the pharmacy workforce: understanding the challenges of revalidation. Res Soc Adm Pharm. 2013;9:199–214.