E-Democracy Systems and Participation Outcomes in Urban Governance

Citizen E-Participation in Urban Governance: Crowdsourcing and Collaborative Creativity

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 19-33

  Sharma, Rajeev ^a   Kankanhalli, Atreyi ^b   Taher, Mahdieh ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WOLLONGONG   (Australia)

^b NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944724738     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-4666-4169-3.ch002     Document Type: Chapter

References (77)

1. Arrow, K. J. (1951). Social choice and individual values. New York: Wiley.
2. Beath, C. M., Orlikowski, W. J. (1994). The contradictory structure of systems development methodologies: Deconstructing the IS-user relationship in information engineering. Information Systems Research, 5(4), 350-377, 10.1287/ isre.5.4.350.
3. Behrouzi, M. (2005). Democracy as the political empowerment of the citizen: Direct-deliberative e-democracy. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
4. Bottger, P. C., Yetton, P. W. (1988). An integration of process and decision scheme explanations of group problem solving performance. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42(2), 234-249, 10.1016/0749- 5978(88)90014-3.
5. Coleman, S., Gøtze, J. (2001). Bowling together: Online public engagement in policy deliberation online public engagement in policy deliberation. London, UK: Hansard Society.
6. Dai, X., Norton, P. (2008). The Internet and parliamentary democracy in Europe: A comparative study of the ethics of political communication in the digital age. New York, NY: Routledge.
7. Dennis, A. R., Reinicke, B. A. (2004). BETA versus VHS and the acceptance of electronic brainstorming technology. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 28(1), 1-20.
8. Dennis, A. R., Tyran, C. K., Vogel, D. R., Nunamaker, J. F. (1997). Group support systems planning strategic. Journal of Management Information Systems, 14(1), 155-184.
9. Dennis, A. R., Wixom, B. H., Vandenberg, R. J. (2001). Understanding fit and appropriation effects in group support systems via meta-analysis. Management Information Systems Quarterly, 25(2), 167-193, 10.2307/3250928.
10. Dijk, J. (2000). Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In Hacker, K., van Dijk, J. (Eds.), Digital democracy, issues of theory and practice. London: Sage.
11. European Commission. (2007). Communicating about Europe via the Internet-engaging the citizens. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/ communication/pdf/internet-strategy_en.pdf Grönlund
12. Gronlund Å. (2003). Emerging electronic infrastructures: Exploring democratic components. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 55-72, 10.1177/0894439302238971.
13. Habermas, J. (1985). The theory of communicative action (Vol. 1). Boston: Beacon Press.
14. Habermas, J. (1999). Three normative models of democracy: Liberal, republican, procedural. In Kearney, R., Dooley, M. (Eds.), Questioning ethics: Contemporary debates in philosophy. New York, NY: Routledge.
15. Hercheui, M. D. (2009). Virtual communities and democratic debates: A case study on institutional influences. International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Proceedings. Phoenix.
16. Hirschheim, R. A., Klein, H. K., Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/ CBO9780511895425.
17. Hirst, P. (1990). Representative democracy and its limits. Cambridge: Polity Press.
18. Jain, A., Patnayakuni, R. (2003). Public expectations and public scrutiny: An agenda for research in the context of e-government. American Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings. Tampa.
19. Kang, D. J., Dyson, L. E. (2007). Internet politics in South Korea: The case of Rohsamo and Ohmynews Internet politics in South Korea. 18th Australasian Conference on Information Systems Proceedings (pp. 1027-1034). Toowoomba.
20. Locke, J. (2005). The second treatise of government. Keystones of democracy. New York, NY: Barnes and Noble.
21. Lyons, W., Alexander, R. (2000). A tale of two electorates: Generational replacement and the decline of voting in presidential elections. The Journal of Politics, 26(4), 1014-1034.
22. Macpherson, C. B. (1977). The life and times of liberal democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Markus, M. L. (2004). Technochange management: Using IT to drive organizational change. Journal of Information Technology, 19(1), 4-20, 10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000002.
24. Markus, M. L., Robey, D. (1988). Information technology and organizational change: Causal structure in theory and research. Management Science, 34(5), 583-598, 10.1287/mnsc.34.5.583.
25. Moon, M. J. (2000). The evolution of e-government among municipalities: Rhetoric or reality? Public Administration Review, 62(4), 424-433, 10.1111/0033-3352.00196.
26. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action: Public goods and the theory of groups. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
27. Päivärinta, T., Sæbø, Ø. (2006). Models of e-democracy. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 17(1), 818-840.
28. Parry, G., Moyser, G., Day, N. (1992). Political participation and democracy in Britain. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9780511558726.
29. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2005). A research framework for citizen participation via eConsultation. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings
30. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12), 128-132, 10.1145/1409360.1409385.
31. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., Chua, Z., Goh, K.-Y. (2007). Investigating participation in online policy discussion forums over time: Does network structure matter? International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Proceedings. Montreal, Canada
32. Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B. C. Y., Teo, H.-H.(2006). Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 555-569. 10.1109/ TEM.2006.883710.
33. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2005). A research framework for citizen participation via eConsultation. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings. Omaha, NE.
34. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2008). A framework of ICT exploitation for e-participation initiatives. Communications of the ACM, 51(12) 128-132. doi:10.1145/1409360.1409385.
35. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A., Chua, Z., Goh, K.-Y. (2007). Investigating participation in online policy discussion forums over time: Does network structure matter? International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS) Proceedings. Montreal, Canada
36. Phang, C. W., Sutanto, J., Kankanhalli, A., Li, Y., Tan, B. C. Y., Teo, H.-H. (2006). Senior citizens' acceptance of information systems: A study in the context of e-government services. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 53(4), 555-569 10.1109/ TEM.2006.883710
37. Rousseau, J.-J. (2005). The social contract. Keystones of democracy. New York, NY: Barnes and Noble.
38. Sæbø, Ø. (2006). A process for identifying objectives and technological forms in e-democracy initiatives. Americas Conference on Information Systems (AMCIS) Proceedings. Acapulco.
39. Sæbø, Ø., Päivärinta, T. (2005). Autopoietic cybergenres for e-democracy? Genre analysis of a web-based discussion board. Proceedings of the 38th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
40. Sahu, G. P., Dwivedi, Y. K., Weerakkody, V. (2009). E-Government development and diffusion: Inhibitors and facilitators of digital democracy. Hershey, PA: IGI Global, 10.4018/978-1- 60566-713-3.
41. Sartori, G. (1987). The theory of democracy revisited. Chatham, NJ: Chatham House.
42. Sen, A. K. (1999). Democracy as a universal value. Journal of Democracy, 10(3), 3-17, 10.1353/ jod.1999.0055.
43. Sharma, R. (2011). Investigating the effect of participation-limiting structures on outcomes of e-democracy systems. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems (PACIS) Proceedings. Brisbane, Paper 174.
44. Srivastava, S. C., Teo, T. S. H. (2009). Citizen trust development for e-government adoption and usage: Insights from young adults in Singapore. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 25(1), 359-378.
45. Suzumura, K. (2005). An interview with Paul Samuelson: Welfare economics, "old" and "new," and social choice theory. Social Choice and Welfare, 25, 327-356, 10.1007/s00355-005-0007-9.
46. UN. (2011). World urbanization prospects, the 2011 revision. Retrieved from http://esa.un.org/unup/Documentation/final-report.htm
47. van Mill, D. (2006). Deliberation, social choice and absolutist democracy. New York, NY: Routledge.
48. Verba, S., Nie, N. (1972). Participation in America: Political democracy and social equality. New York, NY: Harper and Row.
49. Verba, S., Schlozman, K., Brady, H. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
50. Warren, M. E., Pearse, H. (2008). Designing deliberative democracy: The British Columbia citizens' assembly. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 10.1017/CBO9780511491177.
51. Weerakkody, V., Janssen, M., Dwivedi, Y. K. (2009). Handbook of research on ICT-enabled transformational government: A global perspective. IGI Global, 10.4018/978-1-60566-390-6.
52. Yetton, P. W., Vroom, V. H. (1973). Leadership and decision-making. University of Pittsburgh Press.
53. Adams, B. (2004). Public meetings and the democratic process. Public Administration Review, 64(1), 43-54, 10.1111/j.1540- 6210.2004.00345.x.
54. Åström, J., Karlsson, M., Linde, J., Pirannejad, A. (2012). Understanding the rise of eparticipation in non-democracies: Domestic and international factors. Government Information Quarterly.
55. Barber, B. (1998). A place for us: How to make society civil and democracy strong. New York: Hill and Wang.
56. Bishop, P., Anderson, L. (2011). Communicative mechanisms of governance: E-democracy and the architecture of the public sphere. In Information communication technologies and the virtual public sphere (pp. 52-71). Hershey, PA: IGI Global.
57. Chadwick, A. (2003). Bringing e-democracy back in: Why it matters for future research on e-governance. Social Science Computer Review, 21(4), 443-455, 10.1177/0894439303256372.
58. Cullen, R., Sommer, L. (2011). Participatory democracy and the value of online community networks: An exploration of online and offline communities engaged in civil society and political activity. Government Information Quarterly, 28(2), 148-154 10.1016/j.giq.2010.04.008.
59. Dahlberg, L. (2001). The internet and democratic discourse: Exploring the prospects of online deliberative forums extending the public sphere. Information Communication and Society, 4(4), 615-633, 10.1080/13691180110097030.
60. Efremov, R., Insua, D. R. (2010). Collaborative decision analysis and e-democracy. In D. Rios Insua, S. French, M. F. Shakun, T. Bui, G. O. Faure, G. Kersten, D. M. Kilgour, et al. (Eds.), e-Democracy, 5, 83-99. Springer.
61. Gross, T. (2002). E-democracy and community networks: Political visions, technological opportunities, and social reality. In Gronlund, A. (Ed.), Electronic government: Design, applications, and management (pp. 249-266). London: Idea Group Publishing.
62. Hague, B. N., Loader, B. (1999). Digital democracy: Discourse and decision making in the information age. New York, NY: Routledge.
63. Insua, D. R., French, S. (2010). E-democracy: A group decision and negotiation perspective. Advances in group decision and negotiation, 5. London: Springer.
64. Jensen, J. L. (2003). Virtual democratic dialogue? Bringing together citizens and politicians. Information Polity, 8, 29-47.
65. Kumar, N., Vragov, R. (2005). The citizen participation continuum: Where does the US stand? Proceedings of Americas Conference on Information Systems. Omaha, USA.
66. Lee, C., Chang, K., Berry, F. S. (2011). Testing the development and diffusion of e-government and e-democracy: A global perspective. Public Administration Review, 71(3), 444-454, 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2011.02228.x.
67. Macintosh, A. (2004). Characterizing e-participation in policy-making. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS).
68. Mahrer, H., Krimmer, R. (2005). Towards the enhancement of e-democracy: Identifying the notion of the "middleman paradox.". Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 27-42, 10.1111/ j.1365-2575.2005.00184.x.
69. Mathews, D. (1994). Politics for people: Finding a responsible public voice. Chicago: University of Illinois Press.
70. Meier, A. (2012). eDemocracy eGovernment: Stages of a democratic knowledge society. Verlang Berlin Heidelburg: Springer.
71. Milner, H. (2002). Civic literacy: How informed citizens make democracy work. Hanover: University of New England Press.
72. OECD. (2003). Promise and problems of e-democracy: Challenges of online citizen engagement. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.
73. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2006). Promoting citizen participation via digital government. In Anttiroiko, A., Mälkiä, M. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of digital government. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 10.4018/978-1-59140-789-8.ch206.
74. Phang, C. W., Kankanhalli, A. (2008). Current state and future of e-participation research. In Garson, G. D., Khosrow-Pour, M. (Eds.), Handbook of research on public information technology. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, 10.4018/978-1- 59904-857-4.ch008.
75. Tambouris, E., Gorilas, S. (2003). Evaluation of an e-democracy platform for European cities. In R. Traunmuller (Ed.), Electronic government 2003, 43-48.
76. Thrane, L. E., Shelley, M. C. II, Shulman, S. W., Beisser, S. R., Larson, T. B. (2004). Epolitical involvement: Age effects or attitudinal barriers? Journal of E-Government, 1(4), 21-37, 10.1300/J399v01n04_03.
77. Watson, R.T., Mundy. (2001). A strategic perspective of electronic democracy. Communications of the ACM, 44(1), 27-30, 10.1145/357489.357499.