Mechanosensitive channel MSL8 regulates osmotic forces during pollen hydration and germination

Science

Volumn 350, Issue 6259, 2015, Pages 438-441

  Hamilton, Eric S ^a   Jensen, Gregory S ^a   Maksaev, Grigory ^a   Katims, Andrew ^a,b   Sherp, Ashley M ^a   Haswell, Elizabeth S ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MIAMI MILLER SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ION CHANNEL; MESSENGER RNA; MSL8 PROTEIN; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEIN; MSL8 PROTEIN, ARABIDOPSIS; WATER;

EUKARYOTE; FERTILITY; GERMINATION; HYDRATION; ION EXCHANGE; MEMBRANE; OSMOSIS; POLLEN; PROTEIN; WATER CONTENT;

ALLELE; ARABIDOPSIS THALIANA; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; CONCENTRATION (PARAMETERS); CONTROLLED STUDY; DNA TRANSFER; ENVIRONMENTAL STRESS; ENZYME ACTIVITY; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FLOWER; GAMETE; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE INSERTION; GENE OVEREXPRESSION; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC TRANSCRIPTION; HEMIZYGOTE; HYPOOSMOTIC STRESS; IN VITRO STUDY; ION CONDUCTANCE; ION CURRENT; MALE FERTILITY; MEMBRANE PERMEABILITY; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; MONOCOT; NONHUMAN; OSMOLARITY; OSMOTIC POTENTIAL; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; PHYLOGENY; PLANT GROWTH; PLANT LEAF; PLANT LIFE CYCLE STAGE; PLANT ROOT; POLLEN; POLLEN GERMINATION; POLLEN TUBE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; REGULATORY MECHANISM; REHYDRATION; RNA ISOLATION; RNA SEQUENCE; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; TENSION; TRANSGENIC PLANT; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ANIMAL; ARABIDOPSIS; CHANNEL GATING; GENETICS; GERMINATION; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION; OOCYTE; PHYSIOLOGY; POLLINATION; SURFACE TENSION;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); EUKARYOTA;

ANIMALS; ARABIDOPSIS; ARABIDOPSIS PROTEINS; GERMINATION; ION CHANNEL GATING; ION CHANNELS; MECHANOTRANSDUCTION, CELLULAR; OOCYTES; OSMOTIC PRESSURE; POLLINATION; SURFACE TENSION; WATER; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84944722397     PISSN: 00368075     EISSN: 10959203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1126/science.aac6014     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. A. Anishkin, S. H. Loukin, J. Teng, C. Kung, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 111, 7898-7905 (2014).
2. C. D. Pivetti et al., Microbiol. Mol. Biol. Rev. 67, 66-85 (2003).
3. E. S. Hamilton, A. M. Schlegel, E. S. Haswell, Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 66, 113-137 (2015).
4. I. R. Booth, P. Blount, J. Bacteriol. 194, 4802-4809 (2012).
5. E. S. Haswell, R. Peyronnet, H. Barbier-Brygoo, E. M. Meyerowitz, J. M. Frachisse, Curr. Biol. 18, 730-734 (2008).
6. N. Firon, M. Nepi, E. Pacini, Ann. Bot. 109, 1201-1214 (2012).
7. G. G. Franchi et al., J. Exp. Bot. 62, 5267-5281 (2011).
8. A. F. Edlund, R. Swanson, D. Preuss, Plant Cell 16 (suppl. 1), S84-S97 (2004).
9. H. J. Wang, J. C. Huang, G. Y. Jauh, Adv. Bot. Res. 54, 1-52 (2010).
10. L. Beauzamy, N. Nakayama, A. Boudaoud, Ann. Bot. 114, 1517-1533 (2014).
11. J. Kroeger, A. Geitmann, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 15, 618-624 (2012).
12. E. Michard, F. Alves, J. A. Feijó, Int. J. Dev. Biol. 53, 1609-1622 (2009).
13. J. A. Feijo, R. Mahlo, G. Obermeyer, Protoplasma 187, 155-167 (1995).
14. R. Dutta, K. R. Robinson, Plant Physiol. 135, 1398-1406 (2004).
15. A. E. Loraine, S. McCormick, A. Estrada, K. Patel, P. Qin, Plant Physiol. 162, 1092-1109 (2013).
16. D. Twell, T. M. Klein, M. E. Fromm, S. McCormick, Plant Physiol. 91, 1270-1274 (1989).
17. C. Myers et al., Plant J. 59, 528-539 (2009).
18. S. Frietsch et al., Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 104, 14531-14536 (2007).
19. M. Tunc-Ozdemir et al., PLOS ONE 8, e55277 (2013).
20. G. Maksaev, E. S. Haswell, J. Gen. Physiol. 138, 641-649 (2011).
21. G. Maksaev, E. S. Haswell, Channels 7, 215-220 (2013).
22. R. Arunkumar, E. B. Josephs, R. J. Williamson, S. I. Wright, Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2475-2486 (2013).
23. M. Bialecka-Fornal, H. J. Lee, R. Phillips, J. Bacteriol. 197, 231-237 (2015).
24. O. Hamant, Curr. Opin. Plant Biol. 16, 654-660 (2013).
25. C. J. Miller, L. A. Davidson, Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 733-744 (2013).