Chronic pacing and adverse outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation

Heart

Volumn 101, Issue 20, 2015, Pages 1665-1671

  Dizon, Jose M ^a,b   Nazif, Tamim M ^a,b   Hess, Paul L ^c   Biviano, Angelo ^a,b   Garan, Hasan ^a   Douglas, Pamela S ^c   Kapadia, Samir ^d   Babaliaros, Vasilis ^e   Herrmann, Howard C ^f   Szeto, Wilson Y ^f   Jilaihawi, Hasan ^g   Fearon, William F ^h   Tuzcu, E Murat ^d   Pichard, Augusto D ⁱ   Makkar, Raj ^g   Williams, Mathew ^j   Hahn, Rebecca T ^a,b   Xu, Ke ^b   Smith, Craig R ^a,b   Leon, Martin B ^a,b   Kodali, Susheel K ^a,b   more..

^a Columbia University ^*  (United States)

^b CARDIOVASCULAR RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^e EMORY UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^f HOSPITAL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^g CEDARS SINAI MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^h STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

ⁱ WASHINGTON HOSPITAL CENTER   (United States)

^j NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVERSE OUTCOME; AGED; ARTICLE; ATRIAL FIBRILLATION; CARDIOVASCULAR MORTALITY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE ASSOCIATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAM; FEMALE; HEART LEFT BUNDLE BRANCH BLOCK; HOSPITAL READMISSION; HUMAN; MALE; PACEMAKER IMPLANTATION; PERCUTANEOUS AORTIC VALVE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK FACTOR; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIETY OF THORACIC SURGEON SCORE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE IMPLANTATION; TREATMENT INDICATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERY ELDERLY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; ARTIFICIAL HEART PACEMAKER; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPLICATION; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; EPIDEMIOLOGY; FOLLOW UP; MORTALITY; MULTICENTER STUDY; PROGNOSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SURVIVAL RATE; TRENDS; UNITED STATES;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; AORTIC VALVE STENOSIS; BUNDLE-BRANCH BLOCK; ELECTROCARDIOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; PACEMAKER, ARTIFICIAL; PROGNOSIS; SURVIVAL RATE; TRANSCATHETER AORTIC VALVE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84944513974     PISSN: 13556037     EISSN: 1468201X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/heartjnl-2015-307666     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Leon MB, Smith CR, Mack M, et al. Transcatheter aortic-valve implantation for aortic stenosis in patients who cannot undergo surgery. N Engl J Med 2010;363:1597-607.
2. Smith CR, Leon MB, Mack MJ, et al. Transcatheter versus surgical aortic-valve replacement in high-risk patients. N Eng J Med 2011;364:2187-98.
3. Chieffo A, Buchanan GL, Van Mieghem NM, et al. Transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the Edwards Sapien versus the Medtronic CoreValve Revalving sytem devices: a multicenter collaborative study: the PRAGMATIC Plus Initiative (Pooled-Rotterdam-Milano-Toulouse In Collaboration). J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;61:830-6.
4. Erkapic D, De Rosa S, Kelava A, et al. Risk for permanent pacemaker after transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a comprehensive analysis of the literature. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol 2012;23:391-7.
5. Khatri PJ, Webb JG, Rodes-Cabau J, et al. Adverse effects associated with transcatheter aortic valve implantation: a meta-analysis of contemporary studies. Ann Int Med 2013;158:35-46.
6. Jilaihawi H, Chakravarty T, Weiss RE, et al. Meta-analysis of complications in aortic valve replacement: comparison of Medtronic-Corevalve, Edwards-Sapien and surgical aortic valve replacement in 8,536 patients. CatheterCardiovasc Interv 2012;80:128-38.
7. Siontis GC, Juni P, Pilgrim T, et al. Predictors of permanent pacemaker implantation in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing TAVR: a meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:129-40.
8. Siu CW, Wang M, Zhang XH, et al. Analysis of ventricular performance as a function of pacing site and mode. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2008; 51:171-82.
9. Wilkoff BL, Cook JR, Epstein AE, et al. Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator Trial Investigators. Dual-chamber pacing or ventricular backup pacing in patients with an implantable defibrillator: the Dual Chamber and VVI Implantable Defibrillator (DAVID) Trial. JAMA 2002;288:3115-23.
10. Curtis AB, Worley SJ, Adamson PB, et al. Biventricular versus Right Ventricular Pacing in Heart Failure with Atrioventricular Block (BLOCK HF) Trial Investigators. Biventricular pacing for atrioventricular block and systolic dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2013;368:1585-93.
11. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS, Ellenbogen KA, et al. Adverse effect of ventricular pacing on heart failure and atrial fibrillation among patients with normal baseline QRS duration in a clinical trial of pacemaker therapy for sinus node dysfunction. Circulation 2003;107:2932-7.
12. Nazif TM, Williams MR, Hahn RT, et al. Clinical implicatations of new-onset left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: analysis of the PARTNER experience. Eur Heart J 2014;35:1599-607.
13. Urena M, Webb JG, Tamburino C, et al. Permanent pacemaker implantation following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: impact on late clinical outcomes and left ventricular function. Circulation 2014;129:1233-43.
14. Hoffmann R, Herpertz R, Lotipour S, et al. Impact of a new conduction defect after transcatheter aortic valve implantation on left ventricular function. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2012;5:1257-63.
15. Douglas PS, Waugh RA, Bloomfield G, et al. Implementation of echocardiographic core laboratory best practices. A case study of the PARTNER 1 Trial. J Am Soc Echocardiography 2013;26:348-58.
16. Sweeney MO, Hellkamp AS. Heart failure during cardiac pacing. Circulation 2006;113:2082-8.
17. Ahmed M, Gorscan J III, Marek J, et al. Right ventricular apical pacing-induced left ventricular dyssynchrony is associated with a subsequent decline in ejection fraction. Heart Rhythm 2014;11:602-8.
18. Houthuizen P, Van Garsse LA, Poels TT, et al. Left bundle-branch block induced by transcatheter aortic valve implantation increases risk of death. Circulation 2012;126:720-8.
19. Testa L, Latib A, De Marco F, et al. Clinical impact of persistent left bundle branch block after transcatheter aortic valve replacement with CoreValve Revalving System. Circulation 2013;127:1300-7.
20. Urena M, Webb JG, Cheema A, et al. Impact of new onset persistent left bundle branch block on late clinical outcomes in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation with a balloon expandable valve. JACC Cardiovasc Interv 2014;7:128-36.
21. Nazif TM, Dizon JM, Hahn RT, et al. Predictors and clinical outcomes of permanent pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve replacment: The PARTNER (Placement of Aortic Transcatheter Valves) trial and registry. J Am Coll Cardiol Intv 2015;8(1-PA):60-9.
22. van der Boon RMA, Van Mieghem NM, Theuns DA, et al. Pacemaker dependency after transcatheter aortic valve implantation with the self-expanding Medtronic CoreValve system. Int J Cardiol 2013;168:1269-73.
23. Goldenberg G, Kusniec J, Kadmon E, et al. Pacemaker implantation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation. Am J Cardiol 2013;112:1632-4.
24. Lamas GA, Lee KL, Sweeney MO, et al. Ventricular pacing or dual-chamber pacing for sinus node dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2002;346:1854-62.
25. Buellesfeld L, Stortecky S, Heg D, et al. Impact of permanent pacemaker implantation on clinical outcome among patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;60:493-501.
26. Ammann P, Sticherling C, Kalusche D, et al. An electrocardiogram-based algorithm to detect loss of left ventricular capture during cardiac resynchronization therapy. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:968-73.
27. Burkhardt D, Wilcoff BL. Interventional electrophysiology and cardiac resynchronization therapy: delivering electrical therapy for heart failure. Circulation 2007;115:2208-20.