Proprietary Considerations

Handbook of Stem Cells

Volumn 1, Issue , 2004, Pages 793-798

  Eisenberg, Rebecca S ^a   Rai, Arti K ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN LAW SCHOOL   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944397272     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-012436643-5/50088-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (30)

1. http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2001/08/20010809-1.html.
2. Zitener A., Chen E. Stem cell decision doesn't quell debate; Science: Uncertain but resolved researchers gear up to start limited to tests. Senate hearing planned. Los Angeles Times 2001, A1. August 11.
3. Stolberg S.G. The President's decision: The research; U.S. acts quickly to put stem cell policy in effect. New York Times 2001, A1. August 11.
4. Weiss R. A stem cell ethics rules is eased; Bush decision may add colonies for research. Washington Post 2001, A01. August 11.
5. Mishra R., Shadid A. Stem cell grants could begin in Jan. Battles loom on ownership of embryo 'lines'. Boston Globe 2001, A1. August 11.
6. Ackerman T., Roth B. In stem cell debate, what comes next?; Some scientists dubious of Bush-approved plan. Houston Chronicle 2001, A1. August 11.
7. http://www.aaas.org/spp/cstc/issues/stemhsltr.htm.
8. 35 U.S. Code § 202(c)(4).
9. 35 U.S. Code § 203(1).
10. Campbell E.C., Clarridge B.R., Gokhale M., Birenbaum L., Hilgartner S., Holtzman N.A., Blumenthal D. Data withholding in academic genetics: data from a national survey. JAMA 2002, 287:473-480.
11. Heller M.A., Eisenberg R.S. Can patents deter innovation? The anticommons in biomedical research. Science 1998, 280:698-701.
12. http://www.nih.gov/news/researchtools/index.htm.
13. Rai A.K. Regulating scientific research: intellectual property rights and the norms of science. Nw. U. L. Rev. 1999, 94:77-152.
14. Act of Dec. 12, 1980, Pub.L.No. 96-517, Section 6(a), 94 Stat. 3015, 3019-28 (1980) (codified as amended at 35 U.S.C. Sections 200-212 (1994)).
15. U.S. Patent No. 5,843,780 (issued December 1, 1998).
16. National Research Council and Institute of Medicine Stem Cells and the Future of Regenerative Medicine 2001, 33. National Academic Press, Kansas City, MO.
17. U.S. Patent No. 6,200,806 (issued March 13, 2001).
18. Pollack A. University foundation says Geron may lose stem cell rights. New York Times 2001, C12. November 2.
19. Abate T. Stem-cell suit accord could help research; Geron gives up some rights in deal with university. San Francisco Chronicle 2002, B1. January 10.
20. Madey v. Duke University, 307 F.3d 1351 (Oct. 3, 2002).
21. Rai A.K., Eisenberg R.S. Bayh-Dole Reform and the progress of biomedicine. Law Contemporary Prob. 2003, 66:289-314.
22. 35 U.S.Code § 203(2).
23. 35 U.S.Code § 202(b)(4) (providing for review of exceptional circumstances determinations).
24. 35 U.S.Code §§ 203(1)(a),(b).
25. 35 U.S.Code §§ 203(1)(b)-(c).
26. 35 U.S. Code § 202(c)(4).
27. http://www.grants.nih.gov/grants.
28. WARF signs stem cell license agreements. (April 26, 2002). University of Wisconsin Web site, (accessed July 12, 2003). http://www.news.wisc.edu/packages/stemcells/index.msql?get=7437.
29. Testimony of Stanley D. Fry, Eastman Kodak Co. before the Subcommittee on Tech. & Procurement Policy, House Committee on Government Reform (May 10, 2002) (LEXIS).
30. http://www.abanet.org/contract/ederal/randcomm/Bayh-DoleActpro.pdf.