Visualizing the evolution of ontologies: A dynamic graph perspective

CEUR Workshop Proceedings

Volumn 1456, Issue , 2015, Pages 69-76

  Burch, Michael ^a   Lohmann, Steffen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

Graph based ontology visualization; Time varying ontologies

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; DRAWING (GRAPHICS); GRAPHIC METHODS; SEMANTIC WEB; VISUALIZATION;

ONTOLOGY VISUALIZATIONS; POSITION PAPERS; TIME DEPENDENT; TIME VARYING; TIME-VARYING GRAPHS; VISUAL NOTATIONS; VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS; VISUALIZATION TECHNIQUE;

USER INTERFACES;

EID: 84944342805     PISSN: 16130073     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (40)

1. H. Alani. TGVizTab: An ontology visualisation extension for Protégé. In 2nd Workshop on Visualizing Information in Knowledge Engineering, 2003.
2. D. Archambault and H. C. Purchase. The mental map and memorability in dynamic graphs. In IEEE Pacific Visualization Symposium, pages 89-96, 2012.
3. D. Archambault and H. C. Purchase. The "map" in the mental map: Experimental results in dynamic graph drawing. International Journal on Human-Computer Studies, 71(11):1044-1055, 2013.
4. B. Bach, E. Pietriga, I. Liccardi, and G. Legostaev. OntoTrix: A hybrid visualization for populated ontologies. In 20th International Conference on World Wide Web, Companion Volume, pages 177-180. ACM, 2011.
5. J. Ba¯rzdiņš, G. Ba¯rzdiņš, K. Čera¯ns, R. Liepiņš, and A. Sprogis. OWLGrEd: A UML style graphical notation and editor for OWL 2. In International Workshop on OWL: Experiences and Directions, CEUR-WS, vol. 614, 2010.
6. F. Beck, M. Burch, S. Diehl, and D. Weiskopf. The state of the art in visualizing dynamic graphs. In EuroVis - STARs, pages 83-103. EA, 2014.
7. A. Bosca, D. Bonino, and P. Pellegrino. OntoSphere: More than a 3D ontology visualization tool. In 2nd Italian Semantic Web Workshop, CEUR-WS, vol. 166.
8. M. Burch and D. Weiskopf. Visualizing dynamic quantitative data in hierarchies - TimeEdgeTrees: Attaching dynamic weights to tree edges. In International Conference on Information Visualization Theory and Applications, pages 177-186, 2011.
9. S. Diehl and C. Görg. Graphs, they are changing. In International Symposium on Graph Drawing, pages 23-30, 2002.
10. M. Dudáš, O. Zamazal, and V. Svátek. Roadmapping and navigating in the ontology visualization landscape. In 19th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pages 137-152. Springer, 2014.
11. P. Eklund, N. Roberts, and S. Green. OntoRama: Browsing RDF ontologies using a hyperbolic-style browser. In 1st International Symposium on Cyber Worlds, pages 405-411. IEEE, 2002.
12. R. Falco, A. Gangemi, S. Peroni, D. Shotton, and F. Vitali. Modelling OWL ontologies with graffoo. In ESWC 2014 Satellite Events, pages 320-325. Springer, 2014.
13. S. Falconer. OntoGraf. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/OntoGraf, 2010.
14. B. Fu, N. F. Noy, and M.-A. Storey. Indented tree or graph? A usability study of ontology visualization techniques in the context of class mapping evaluation. In 12th International Semantic Web Conference, pages 117-134. Springer, 2013.
15. S. S. Guo and C. W. Chan. A tool for ontology visualization in 3D graphics: Onto3DViz. In 23rd Canadian Conference on Electrical and Computer Engineering, pages 1-4. IEEE, 2010.
16. M. Hartung, A. Groí, and E. Rahm. COnto-Diff: Generation of complex evolution mappings for life science ontologies. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 46(1):15-32, 2013.
17. M. Hartung, T. Kirsten, A. Groß, and E. Rahm. OnEX: Exploring changes in life science ontologies. BMC Bioinformatics, 10(250), 2009.
18. P. Hayes, T. C. Eskridge, R. Saavedra, T. Reichherzer, M. Mehrotra, and D. Bobrovnikoff. Collaborative knowledge capture in ontologies. In International Conference on Knowledge Capture, pages 99-106. ACM, 2005.
19. C. Healey and J. Enns. Attention and visual memory in visualization and computer graphics. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(7):1170-1188, 2012.
20. J. Heflin and J. A. Hendler. Dynamic ontologies on the web. In 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence and 12th Conference on Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence, pages 443-449. AAAI, 2000.
21. D. Holten. Hierarchical edge bundles: Visualization of adjacency relations in hierarchical data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 12(5):741-748, 2006.
22. W. Hop, S. de Ridder, F. Frasincar, and F. Hogenboom. Using hierarchical edge bundles to visualize complex ontologies in GLOW. In 27th Annual ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 304-311. ACM, 2012.
23. M. Horridge. OWLViz. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/OWLViz, 2010.
24. J. Howse, G. Stapleton, K. Taylor, and P. Chapman. Visualizing ontologies: A case study. In 10th International Semantic Web Conference, pages 257-272. Springer, 2011.
25. A. Hussain, K. Latif, A. Rextin, A. Hayat, and M. Alam. Scalable visualization of semantic nets using power-law graphs. Applied Mathematics & Information Sciences, 8(1):355-367, 2014.
26. A. Katifori, C. Halatsis, G. Lepouras, C. Vassilakis, and E. Giannopoulou. Ontology visualization methods - a survey. ACM Computer Surveys, 39(4), 2007.
27. M. C. A. Klein, D. Fensel, A. Kiryakov, and D. Ognyanov. Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In 13th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Knowledge Management, pages 197-212. Springer, 2002.
28. M. Lanzenberger, J. Sampson, and M. Rester. Visualization in ontology tools. In International Conference on Complex, Intelligent and Software Intensive Systems, pages 705-711. IEEE, 2009.
29. T. Liebig and O. Noppens. OntoTrack: A semantic approach for ontology authoring. Web Semantics, 3(2-3):116-131, 2005.
30. S. Lohmann, P. Díaz, and I. Aedo. MUTO: The modular unified tagging ontology. In 7th International Conference on Semantic Systems (I-SEMANTICS'11), pages 95-104. ACM, 2011.
31. S. Lohmann, S. Negru, F. Haag, and T. Ertl. Visualizing ontologies with VOWL. Semantic Web Journal, to appear.
32. J. D. Novak and A. J. Cañas. The theory underlying concept maps and how to construct them. Technical Report IHMC CmapTools 2006-01, Florida Institute for Human and Machine Cognition, 2006.
33. N. F. Noy and M. Klein. Ontology evolution: Not the same as schema evolution. Knowledge and Information Systems, 6(4):428-440, 2004.
34. N. F. Noy and M. A. Musen. PromptDiff: A fixed-point algorithm for comparing ontology versions. In 18th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pages 744-750. AAAI, 2002.
35. D. Perrin. PROMPT-Viz: ontology version comparison visualizations with treemaps. Master thesis, University of Victoria, 2004.
36. P. Plessers, O. De Troyer, and S. Casteleyn. Understanding ontology evolution: A change detection approach. Web Semantics, 5(1):39-49, 2007.
37. R. Rosenholtz, Y. Li, J. Mansfield, and Z. Jin. Feature congestion: A measure of display clutter. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pages 761-770, 2005.
38. M. Sintek. OntoViz. http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/OntoViz, 2007.
39. E. R. Tufte. The visual display of quantitative information. Graphics Press, 1992.
40. T. D. Wang and B. Parsia. CropCircles: Topology sensitive visualization of OWL class hierarchies. In 5th International Semantic Web Conference, pages 695-708. Springer, 2006.