Criterion validity of competing accelerometry-based activity monitoring devices

Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise

Volumn 47, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2456-2463

  Kim, Youngwon ^a   Welk, Gregory J ^a  

^a IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

ACCELEROMETER; ENERGY EXPENDITURE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; VALIDITY

Indexed keywords

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DEVICES; ENERGY METABOLISM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMAN; INDIRECT CALORIMETRY; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; VALIDATION STUDY; YOUNG ADULT;

ACCELEROMETRY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; CALORIMETRY, INDIRECT; ENERGY METABOLISM; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 84944326983     PISSN: 01959131     EISSN: 15300315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000691     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Ainsworth BE, Caspersen CJ, Matthews CE, Masse LC, Baranowski T, Zhu W,. Recommendations to improve the accuracy of estimates of physical activity derived from self report. J Phys Act Health. 2012; 9 (1 Suppl): S76-84.
2. Anastasopoulou P, Tubic M, Schmidt S, Neumann R, Woll A, Hartel S,. Validation and comparison of two methods to assess human energy expenditure during free-living activities. Plos One. 2014; 9 (2): e90606.
3. Barnes J, Behrens TK, Benden ME, Letter to the editor: standardized use of the terms "sedentary" and "sedentary behaviours." Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2012; 37 (3): 540-2.
4. Bassett DR, John D, Conger SA, Rider BC, Passmore RM, Clark JM,. Detection of lying down, sitting, standing, and stepping using two ActivPAL monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46 (10): 2025-9.
5. Bassett DR, Rowlands A, Trost SG,. Calibration and validation of wearable monitors. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012; 44: S32-8.
6. Berntsen S, Hageberg R, Aandstad A, Validity of physical activity monitors in adults participating in free-living activities. Br J Sports Med. 2010; 44 (9): 657-64.
7. Calabro M, Lee JM, Saint-Maurice PF, Validity of physical activity monitors for assessing lower intensity activity in adults. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2014; 11 (1): 119.
8. Clark BK, Winkler E, Healy GN, Adults' past-day recall of sedentary time: reliability, validity, and responsiveness. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2013; 45 (6): 1198-207.
9. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J,. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998; 30 (5): 777-81.
10. Fruin ML, Rankin JW,. Validity of a multi-sensor armband in estimating rest and exercise energy expenditure. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36 (6): 1063-9.
11. Godfrey A, Culhane KM, Lyons GM,. Comparison of the performance of the activPAL professional physical activity logger to a discrete accelerometer-based activity monitor. Med Eng Phys. 2007; 29 (8): 930-4.
12. Hall KS, Howe CA, Rana SR, Martin CL, Morey MC,. METs and accelerometry of walking in older adults: standard versus measured energy cost. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2013; 45 (3): 574-82.
13. Hart TL, Ainsworth BE, Tudor-Locke C,. Objective and subjective measures of sedentary behavior and physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43 (3): 449-56.
14. Hodges LD, Brodie DA, Bromley PD,. Validity and reliability of selected commercially available metabolic analyzer systems. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2005; 15 (5): 271-9.
15. Jakicic JM, Marcus M, Gallagher KI, Evaluation of the SenseWear Pro Armband to assess energy expenditure during exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36 (5): 897-904.
16. Janssen X, Cliff DP, Reilly JJ, Predictive validity and classification accuracy of ActiGraph energy expenditure equations and cut-points in young children. Plos One. 2013; 8 (11).
17. Johannsen DL, Calabro MA, Stewart J, Franke W, Rood JC, Welk GJ,. Accuracy of armband monitors for measuring daily energy expenditure in healthy adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2010; 42 (11): 2134-40.
18. John D, Freedson P,. ActiGraph and Actical physical activity monitors: a peek under the hood. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012; 44: S86-9.
19. Katzmarzyk PT,. Standing and mortality in a prospective cohort of Canadian adults. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2014; 46 (5): 940-6.
20. King GA, Torres N, Potter C, Brooks TJ, Coleman KJ,. Comparison of activity monitors to estimate energy cost of treadmill exercise. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004; 36 (7): 1244-51.
21. Kozey-Keadle S, Libertine A, Lyden K, Staudenmayer J, Freedson PS,. Validation of wearable monitors for assessing sedentary behavior. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2011; 43 (8): 1561-7.
22. Lee JM, Kim Y, Welk GJ,. Validity of consumer-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46 (9): 1840-8.
23. Matthews CE, Hagstromer M, Pober DM, Bowles HR,. Best practices for using physical activity monitors in population-based research. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2012; 44: S68-76.
24. Matthews CE, Moore SC, George SM, Sampson J, Bowles HR,. Improving self-reports of active and sedentary behaviors in large epidemiologic studies. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2012; 40 (3): 118-26.
25. Reilly JJ, Kelly LA, Montgomery C, Validation of Actigraph accelerometer estimates of total energy expenditure in young children. Int J Pediatr Obes. 2006; 1 (3): 161-7.
26. Rosdahl H, Gullstrand L, Salier-Eriksson J, Johansson P, Schantz P,. Evaluation of the Oxycon mobile metabolic system against the Douglas bag method. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010; 109 (2): 159-71.
27. Rowlands AV, Olds TS, Hillsdon M, Assessing sedentary behavior with the GENEActiv: introducing the sedentary sphere. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46 (6): 1235-47.
28. Ryan CG, Grant PM, Tigbe WW, Granat MH,. The validity and reliability of a novel activity monitor as a measure of walking. Br J Sports Med. 2006; 40 (9): 779-84.
29. Santos-Lozano A, Santin-Medeiros F, Cardon G, Actigraph GT3X: validation and determination of physical activity intensity cut points. Int J Sports Med. 2013; 34 (11): 975-82.
30. Sasaki JE, John D, Freedson PS,. Validation and comparison of ActiGraph activity monitors. J Sci Med Sport. 2011; 14 (5): 411-6.
31. Schofield WN,. Predicting basal metabolic rate, new standards and review of previous work. Hum Nutr Clin Nutr. 1985; 39 (1 Suppl): 5-41.
32. Slootmaker SM, Chin A, Paw MJ, Schuit AJ, van Mechelen W, Koppes LL,. Concurrent validity of the PAM accelerometer relative to the MTI Actigraph using oxygen consumption as a reference. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2009; 19 (1): 36-43.
33. Steeves JA, Bowles HR, McClain JJ, Ability of thigh-worn ActiGraph and activPAL monitors to classify posture and motion. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015; 47 (5): 952-9.
34. Strath SJ, Brage SR, Ekelund ULF,. Integration of physiological and accelerometer data to improve physical activity sssessment. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005; 37 (11 Suppl): S563-71.
35. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M,. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008; 40 (1): 181-8.
36. Troiano RP, Pettee Gabriel KK, Welk GJ, Owen N, Sternfeld B,. Reported physical activity and sedentary behavior: why do you ask? J Phys Act Health. 2012; 9 (1 Suppl): S68-75.
37. Trost SG, Loprinzi PD, Moore R, Pfeiffer KA,. Comparison of accelerometer cut points for predicting activity intensity in youth. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2011; 43 (7): 1360-8.
38. Trost SG, Way R, Okely AD,. Predictive validity of three ActiGraph energy expenditure equations for children. Med Sci Sport Exerc. 2006; 38 (2): 380-7.
39. Welk GJ, Kim Y, Stanfill B, Validity of 24-h physical activity recall: physical activity measurement survey. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2014; 46 (10): 2014-24.
40. Welk GJ, McClain JJ, Eisenmann JC, Wickel EE,. Field validation of the MTI Actigraph and BodyMedia armband monitor using the IDEEA monitor. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2007; 15 (4): 918-28.