Data exchange standards to support and acknowledge peer-review activity

Learned Publishing

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 309-316

  Paglione, Laura Dorival ^a   Lawrence, Rebecca Naomi ^b  

^a ORCID   (United States)

^b F1000 Research Ltd   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84944056923     PISSN: 09531513     EISSN: 17414857     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1087/20150411     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Peer review. Oxford Dictionaries [Internet]. Oxford University Press. Available from: http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/peer-review
2. Kronick, D.A. 1990. Peer review in 18th-century scientific journalism. JAMA, 263(10): 1321. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100021002.
3. The history of peer review. Planned Obsolescence [Internet]. 26 August 2009. Available from: http://mcpress.media-commons.org/plannedobsolescence/one/the-history-of-peer-review
4. Burnham, J.C. 1990. The evolution of editorial peer review. JAMA, 263(10):1323. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1990.03440100023003.
5. BioMed Central: The Open Access Publisher [Internet]. BioMed Central Ltd, Springer Science+Business Media. Available from: http://www.biomedcentral.com/
6. NPG Journals [Internet]. Nature.com, Macmillian Publishers Ltd. Available from: http://www.nature.com/siteindex/index.html
7. eLIFE [Internet]. eLife Sciences Publications Ltd. ISSN: 2050-084X. Available from: http://elifesciences.org/
8. Rubriq [Internet]. Research Square. Available from: http://www.rubriq.com/
9. Peerage of Science [Internet]. Peerage of Science. Available from: https://www.peerageofscience.org/
10. PubMed Commons. PubMed.gov [Internet], US National Library of Medicine, National Institutes of Health. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmedcommons/
11. PubPeer: The online journal club [Internet]. PubPeer, LLC. Available from: https://pubpeer.com/
12. arXiv.org [Internet]. Cornell University Library. Available from: http://arxiv.org/
13. Social Science Research Network (SSRN): tomorrow’s research today [Internet]. Social Science Electronic Publishing, Inc. Available from: http://www.ssrn.com/
14. bioRxiv: The preprint server for biology [Internet]. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory. Available from: http://biorxiv.org/
15. F1000Prime [Internet]. Faculty of 1000 Limited. Available from: http://f1000.com/prime
16. hypothes.is: The web, annotated [Internet]. Available from: https://hypothes.is/
17. Brantley, P. 2014. Peer review and annotation [Internet]. Hypothes. is, 4 June 2014. Available from: https://hypothes.is/blog/peer-reviewannotation/ (accessed 16 January 2015).
18. Saunders, N. PMRetract [Internet]. January 2015. Available from: http://pmretract.heroku.com
19. Ferguson, C. Elsevier retracting 16 papers for faked peer review. Retraction Watch [Internet], 8 July 2014. Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2014/12/19/elsevier-retracting-16-papers-fakedpeer-review/
20. Oransky, I. SAGE Publications busts ‘peer review and citation ring,’ 60 papers retracted. Retraction Watch [Internet], 14 December 2014. Available from: http://retractionwatch.com/2014/07/08/sage-publications-busts-peer-review-and-citation-ring-60-papers-retracted/
21. BMJ Open [Internet]. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd. ISSN 2044-6055. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/
22. PeerJ [Internet]. PeerJ 2012-2015. ISSN: 2167-8359. Available from: https://peerj.com/
23. F1000 Research [Internet]. F1000 Research Ltd. ISSN 2046-1402. Available from: http://f1000research.com/
24. scienceOpen.com: research+publishing network [Internet]. ScienceOpen. Available from: https://www.scienceopen.com
25. Van Noorden, R. Global scientific output doubles every nine years. Nature.com [Internet], NewsBlog, 7 May 2014. Available from: http://blogs.nature.com/news/2014/05/global-scientific-output-doublesevery-nine-years.html
26. Meadows, A. Recognition for peer review and editing in Australia – and beyond? Exchanges [Internet], 7 January 2015. Available from: http://exchanges.wiley.com/blog/2015/01/07/recognition-for-peerreview-and-editing-in-australia-and-beyond/
27. Larsen, P.O. and von Ins, M. 2010. The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 84(3): 575–603. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0202-z http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2909426/
28. Collabra [Internet]. University of California, Open Press, The Regents of the University of California. Available from: http://www.collabraoa.org/
29. Alberts, P., Hanson, B., and Kelner, K.L. 2008. Reviewing peer review. Science, 321 (5885): 15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1162115.
30. Review rewards. Nature [Internet], 514(7522): 274–274. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/514274a
31. Publons [Internet]. Publons. Available at: https://publons.com/ (accessed 16 January 2015).
32. Academic Karma [Internet]. Available from: http://academickarma.org/
33. Peer Review Services [Internet]. Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (Casrai), 2014–2015. Available from: http://casrai.org/standards/working-groups/peerreview-services (accessed 16 January 2015)
34. Peer Review Services Working Group Members [Internet]. Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (Casrai), 2014–2015. Available from: http://casrai.org/standards/working-groups/peer-review-services/members (accessed 16 January 2015).
35. CASRAI profile for peer review contributions [Internet]. Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (Casrai), 2015. Available from: http://dictionary.casrai.org/Peer_Review_Services
36. Peer review service working group use cases [Internet]. Consortia Advancing Standards in Research Administration Information (Casrai), 2015. Available from: http://casrai.org/standards/subject-groups/peer-review-services/use-cases
37. ORCID Peer Review Early Adopter Program [Internet]. ORCID, Inc, 2015. Available from: http://orcid.org/content/peer-review-earlyadopter-program