CCG supertagging with a recurrent neural network

ACL-IJCNLP 2015 - 53rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 7th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing of the Asian Federation of Natural Language Processing, Proceedings of the Conference

Volumn 2, Issue , 2015, Pages 250-255

  Xu, Wenduan ^a   Auli, Michael ^b   Clark, Stephen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b FACEBOOK AI RESEARCH   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; FEEDFORWARD NEURAL NETWORKS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS; LINGUISTICS; RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS;

ACCURACY IMPROVEMENT; BIOMEDICAL TEXT; LOCAL CONTEXTS; SEQUENCE INFORMATIONS; WIKIPEDIA;

RECURRENT NEURAL NETWORKS; NATURAL LANGUAGE PROCESSING SYSTEMS;

EID: 84944037506     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.3115/v1/p15-2041     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Michael Auli and Adam Lopez. 2011. Training a log-linear parser with loss functions via softmax-margin. In Proceedings of the Conference on Em-pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 333-343. Association for Computational Lin-guistics
2. Srinivas Bangalore and Aravind K Joshi. 1999. Su-pertagging: An approach to almost parsing. Com-putational linguistics, 25(2):237-265
3. Stephen Clark and James R Curran. 2004. The impor-tance of supertagging for wide-coverage CCG pars-ing. In Proceedings of the 20th international confer-ence on Computational Linguistics, page 282. Asso-ciation for Computational Linguistics
4. Stephen Clark and James R. Curran. 2007. Wide-coverage efficient statistical parsing with CCG and log-linear models. Computational Linguistics, 33(4):493-552
5. James R Curran, Stephen Clark, and David Vadas. 2006. Multi-tagging for lexicalized-grammar pars-ing. In Proceedings of the 21st International Con-ference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th annual meeting of the Association for Computa-tional Linguistics, pages 697-704. Association for Computational Linguistics
6. James R Curran, Stephen Clark, and Johan Bos. 2007. Linguistically motivated large-scale NLP with C&C and Boxer. In Proceedings of the 45th Annual Meet-ing of the ACL on Interactive Poster and Demonstra-tion Sessions, pages 33-36. Association for Compu-tational Linguistics
7. Jeffrey L Elman. 1990. Finding structure in time. Cognitive science, 14(2):179-211
8. Julia Hockenmaier and Mark Steedman. 2007. CCG-bank: A corpus of CCG derivations and dependency structures extracted from the Penn Treebank. Com-putational Linguistics, 33(3):355-396
9. Matthew Honnibal, Joel Nothman, and James R Cur-ran. 2009. Evaluating a statistical CCG parser on wikipedia. In Proceedings of the 2009 Workshop on The People's Web Meets NLP: Collaboratively Con-structed Semantic Resources, pages 38-11. Associ-ation for Computational Linguistics
10. Jonathan K Kummerfeld, Jessika Roesner, Tim Daw-Born, James Haggerty, James R Curran, and Stephen Clark. 2010. Faster parsing by supertagger adap-tation. In Proceedings of the 48th Annual Meet-ing of the Association for Computational Linguis-tics, pages 345-355. Association for Computational Linguistics
11. Joel Legrand and Ronan Collobert. 2014. Joint RNN-based greedy parsing and word composition. arXiv preprint arXiv:1412.7028
12. Mike Lewis and Mark Steedman. 2014. Improved CCG parsing with semi-supervised supertagging. Transactions of the Association for Computational Linguistics, 2:327-338
13. Tomas Mikolov, Martin Karafiat, Lukas Burget, Jan Cernocky, and Sanjeev Khudanpur. 2010. Recur-rent neural network based language model. In IN-TERSPEECH 2010, 11th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Makuhari, Chiba, Japan, September 26-30, 2010, pages 1045-1048
14. Tomas Mikolov. 2012. Statistical Language Models Based on Neural Networks. Ph.D. thesis, Brno Uni-versity of Technology
15. Sampo Pyysalo, Filip Ginter, Juho Heimonen, Jari Bjorne, Jorma Boberg, Jouni Jarvinen, and Tapio Salakoski. 2007. Bioinfer: a corpus for information extraction in the biomedical domain. BMC bioinfor-matics, 8(1):50
16. Laura Rimell and Stephen Clark. 2008. Adapt-ing a lexicalized-grammar parser to contrasting do-mains. In Proceedings of the Conference on Em-pirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pages 475-184. Association for Computational Lin-guistics
17. David E Rumelhart, Geoffrey E Hinton, and Ronald J Williams. 1988. Learning representations by back-propagating errors. Cognitive modeling, 5
18. Nitish Srivastava, Geoffrey Hinton, Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Ruslan Salakhutdinov. 2014. Dropout: A simple way to prevent neural networks from overfilling. The Journal of Machine Learning Research, 15(1): 1929-1958
19. Mark Steedman. 2000. The Syntactic Process. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass
20. Joseph Turian, Lev Ratinov, and Yoshua Bengio. 2010. Word representations: a simple and general method for semi-supervised learning. In Proceedings of the 48th annual meeting of the association for compu-tational linguistics, pages 384-394. Association for Computational Linguistics
21. Wenduan Xu, Stephen Clark, and Yue Zhang. 2014. Shift-reduce CCG parsing with a dependency model. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACL Conference
22. Yue Zhang and Stephen Clark. 2011. Shift-reduce CCG parsing. In Proc. ACL 2011, pages 683-692, Portland, OR