A Randomized Controlled Trial of EEG-Based Motor Imagery Brain-Computer Interface Robotic Rehabilitation for Stroke

Clinical EEG and Neuroscience

Volumn 46, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 310-320

  Ang, Kai Keng ^a   Chua, Karen Sui Geok ^b   Phua, Kok Soon ^a   Wang, Chuanchu ^a   Chin, Zheng Yang ^a   Kuah, Christopher Wee Keong ^b   Low, Wilson ^b   Guan, Cuntai ^a  

^a INSTITUTE FOR INFOCOMM RESEARCH   (Singapore)

^b TAN TOCK SENG HOSPITAL   (Singapore)

Author keywords

brain computer interface; EEG; motor imagery; rehabilitation; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; ASSESSMENT OF HUMANS; BRAIN COMPUTER INTERFACE; BRAIN SYMMETRY INDEX; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELBOW; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUGL MEYER ASSESSMENT OF MOTOR RECOVERY AFTER STROKE SCORE; HEMIPLEGIA; HUMAN; IMAGERY; MALE; MANUS THERAPY; MOTOR IMAGERY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; ROBOTICS; SHOULDER; SIGNAL PROCESSING; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; VOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; AGED; ARM; CONVALESCENCE; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PSYCHOTHERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; BRAIN-COMPUTER INTERFACES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGERY (PSYCHOTHERAPY); MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; ROBOTICS; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84944031627     PISSN: 15500594     EISSN: 21695202     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1550059414522229     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Birbaumer N, Cohen LG., Brain-computer interfaces: communication and restoration of movement in paralysis. J Physiol. 2007; 579 (3): 621-636.
2. Birbaumer N, Murguialday AR, Cohen L., Brain-computer interface in paralysis. Curr Opin Neurol. 2008; 21 (6): 634-638.
3. Birbaumer N, Weber C, Neuper C, Buch E, Haapen K, Cohen L,. Physiological regulation of thinking: brain-computer interface (BCI) research. In: Christa N, Wolfgang K, eds. Progress in Brain Research. New York: Elsevier; 2006: 369-391.
4. Daly JJ, Wolpaw JR., Brain-computer interfaces in neurological rehabilitation. Lancet Neurol. 2008; 7 (11): 1032-1043.
5. Hochberg LR, Serruya MD, Friehs GM, et al.,. Neuronal ensemble control of prosthetic devices by a human with tetraplegia. Nature. 2006; 442 (7099): 164-171.
6. Sharma N, Pomeroy VM, Baron J-C., Motor imagery: a backdoor to the motor system after stroke? Stroke. 2006; 37 (7): 1941-1952.
7. Sharma N, Simmons LH, Jones PS, et al.,. Motor imagery after subcortical stroke: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study. Stroke. 2009; 40 (4): 1315-1324.
8. Johnson SH., Imagining the impossible: intact motor representations in hemiplegics. Neuroreport. 2000; 11 (4): 729-732.
9. Johnson SH, Sprehn G, Saykin AJ., Intact motor imagery in chronic upper limb hemiplegics: evidence for activity-independent action representations. J Cog Neurosci. 2002; 14 (6): 841-852.
10. Wang W, Collinger JL, Perez MA, et al.,. Neural Interface technology for rehabilitation: exploiting and promoting neuroplasticity. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am. 2010; 21 (1): 157-178.
11. Kim HK, Park S, Srinivasan MA., Developments in brain-machine interfaces from the perspective of robotics. Hum Movement Sci. 2009; 28 (2): 191-203.
12. Leuthardt EC, Schalk G, Roland J, Rouse A, Moran DW., Evolution of brain-computer interfaces: going beyond classic motor physiology. Neurosurg Focus. 2009; 27 (1): E4.
13. Pfurtscheller G, Brunner C, Schlogl A, Lopes da Silva FH., Mu rhythm (de)synchronization and EEG single-trial classification of different motor imagery tasks. Neuroimage. 2006; 31 (1): 153-159.
14. Ramos-Murguialday A, Schürholz M, Caggiano V, et al.,. Proprioceptive feedback and brain computer interface (BCI) based neuroprostheses. PLoS ONE. 2012; 7 (10): e47048.
15. Gomez-Rodriguez M, Peters J, Hill J, Schölkopf B, Gharabaghi A, Grosse-Wentrup M., Closing the sensorimotor loop: haptic feedback facilitates decoding of motor imagery. J Neural Eng. 2011; 8 (3): 036005.
16. Silvoni S, Ramos-Murguialday A, Cavinato M, et al.,. Brain-computer interface in stroke: a review of progress. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011; 42 (4): 245-52.
17. Daly JJ, Cheng R, Rogers J, Litinas K, Hrovat K, Dohring M., Feasibility of a new application of noninvasive brain computer interface (BCI): a case study of training for recovery of volitional motor control after stroke. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2009; 33 (4): 203-211.
18. Tan HG, Kong KH, Shee CY, Wang CC, Guan CT, Ang WT., Post-acute stroke patients use brain-computer interface to activate electrical stimulation. Proc 32nd Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010; 2010: 4234-4237.
19. Do A, Wang P, King C, Abiri A, Nenadic Z., Brain-computer interface controlled functional electrical stimulation system for ankle movement. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2011; 8 (1): 49.
20. Buch E, Weber C, Cohen LG, et al.,. Think to move: a neuromagnetic brain-computer interface (BCI) system for chronic stroke. Stroke. 2008; 39 (3): 910-917.
21. Kaiser V, Daly I, Pichiorri F, Mattia D, Müller-Putz GR, Neuper C., Relationship between electrical brain responses to motor imagery and motor impairment in stroke. Stroke. 2012; 43 (10): 2735-2740.
22. Caria A, Weber C, Brötz D, et al.,. Chronic stroke recovery after combined BCI training and physiotherapy: a case report. Psychophysiology. 2011; 48: 578-582.
23. Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, et al.,. Near-infrared spectroscopy-mediated neurofeedback enhances efficacy of motor imagery-based training in poststroke victims: a pilot study. Stroke. 2013; 44 (4): 1091-1098.
24. Ramos-Murguialday A, Broetz D, Rea M, et al.,. Brain-machine interface in chronic stroke rehabilitation: a controlled study. Ann Neurol. 2013; 74 (1): 100-108.
25. Krebs HI, Ferraro M, Buerger SP, et al.,. Rehabilitation robotics: pilot trial of a spatial extension for MIT-Manus. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2004; 1 (1): 5.
26. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jääskö L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S,. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975; 7 (1): 13-31.
27. Bohannon RW, Smith MB., Interrater reliability of a modified ashworth scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Therapy. 1987; 67 (2): 206-207.
28. Ang KK, Guan C, Chua KSG, et al.,. A large clinical study on the ability of stroke patients to use EEG-based motor imagery brain-computer interface. Clin EEG Neurosci. 2011; 42 (4): 253-258.
29. Krebs HI, Hogan N, Aisen ML, Volpe BT., Robot-aided neurorehabilitation. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 1998; 6 (1): 75-87.
30. Blankertz B, Dornhege G, Krauledat M, Muller K-R, Curio G., The non-invasive Berlin brain-computer interface: fast acquisition of effective performance in untrained subjects. Neuroimage. 2007; 37 (2): 539-550.
31. Ang KK, Chin ZY, Wang C, Guan C, Zhang H., Filter bank common spatial pattern algorithm on BCI Competition IV Datasets 2a and 2b. Front Neurosci. 2012; 6: 39.
32. Ramoser H, Muller-Gerking J, Pfurtscheller G., Optimal spatial filtering of single trial EEG during imagined hand movement. IEEE Trans Rehabil Eng. 2000; 8 (4): 441-446.
33. Ang KK, Chin ZY, Zhang H, Guan C., Mutual information-based selection of optimal spatial-temporal patterns for single-trial EEG-based BCIs. Pattern Recogn. 2012; 45 (6): 2137-2144.
34. van Putten MJAM,. The revised brain symmetry index. Clin Neurophysiol. 2007; 118 (11): 2362-2367.
35. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, et al.,. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010; 362 (19): 1772-1783.
36. Aisen M, Krebs HI, Hogan N, McDowell F, Volpe BT., The effect of robot-assisted therapy and rehabilitative training on motor recovery following stroke. Arch Neurol. 1997; 54 (4): 443-446.
37. Fasoli SE, Krebs HI, Stein J, Frontera WR, Hogan N., Effects of robotic therapy on motor impairment and recovery in chronic stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003; 84 (4): 477-482.
38. Volpe BT, Huerta PT, Zipse JL, et al.,. Robotic devices as therapeutic and diagnostic tools for stroke recovery. Arch Neurol. 2009; 66 (9): 1086-1090.
39. Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A., Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009; 8 (8): 741-754.
40. Dobkin BH., Training and exercise to drive poststroke recovery. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2008; 4 (2): 76-85.
41. Dobkin BH., Brain-computer interface technology as a tool to augment plasticity and outcomes for neurological rehabilitation. J Physiol. 2007; 579 (3): 637-642.
42. Broetz D, Braun C, Weber C, Soekadar SR, Caria A, Birbaumer N., Combination of brain-computer interface training and goal-directed physical therapy in chronic stroke: a case report. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010; 24 (7): 674-679.
43. Prasad G, Herman P, Coyle D, McDonough S, Crosbie J., Applying a brain-computer interface to support motor imagery practice in people with stroke for upper limb recovery: a feasibility study. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2010; 7 (1): 60.
44. Shindo K, Kawashima K, Ushiba J, et al.,. Effects of neurofeedback training with an electroencephalogram-based brain-computer interface for hand paralysis in patients with chronic stroke: a preliminary case series study. J Rehabil Med. 2011; 43 (10): 951-957.
45. van Putten MJAM, Peters JM, Mulder SM, et al.,. A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Clin Neurophysiol. 2004; 115 (5): 1189-1194.
46. van Putten MJAM, Tavy DLJ., Continuous quantitative EEG monitoring in hemispheric stroke patients using the brain symmetry index. Stroke. 2004; 35 (11): 2489-2492.
47. Tecchio F, Zappasodi F, Pasqualetti P, et al.,. Rhythmic brain activity at rest from rolandic areas in acute mono-hemispheric stroke: a magnetoencephalographic study. Neuroimage. 2005; 28 (1): 72-83.
48. Graziadio S, Tomasevic L, Assenza G, Tecchio F, Eyre JA., The myth of the "unaffected" side after unilateral stroke: is reorganisation of the non-infarcted corticospinal system to re-establish balance the price for recovery? Exp Neurol. 2012; 238 (2): 168-175.