How to compare treebanks

Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation, LREC 2008

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 2322-2329

  Kübler, Sandra ^a,b   Maier, Wolfgang ^a,b   Rehbein, Ines ^a,b   Versley, Yannick ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

^b DUBLIN CITY UNIVERSITY   (Ireland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATA MINING; ENCODING (SYMBOLS); FORESTRY; LINGUISTICS; SIGNAL ENCODING; SYNTACTICS;

ANNOTATION SCHEME; DESIGN DECISIONS; ENCODING SCHEMES; ERROR CLASSIFICATION; GAIN INSIGHT; GRAMMATICAL CONSTRUCTION; LINGUISTIC ANNOTATIONS; SYNTACTICALLY ANNOTATED CORPUS;

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS;

EID: 84943738993     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. Ann Bies and Mohamed Maamouri. 2003. Penn Arabic Treebank guidelines. Technical report, LDC, University of Pennsylvania.
2. Ann Bies, Mark Ferguson, Karen Katz, and Robert MacIntyre, 1995. Bracketing Guidelines for Treebank II Style Penn Treebank Project. University of Pennsylvania.
3. Sabine Brants, Stefanie Dipper, Silvia Hansen, Wolfgang Lezius, and George Smith. 2002. The TIGER Treebank. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2002), pages 24-42, Sozopol, Bulgaria.
4. Michael Daum, Kilian Foth, and Wolfgang Menzel. 2004. Automatic transformation of phrase treebanks to dependency trees. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2004), Lisbon, Portugal.
5. Martin Emms. 2008. Tree-distance and some other variants of evalb. In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2008), Marrakech, Morocco.
6. Martin Forst. 2003. Treebank conversion - creating an fstructure bank from the TIGER Corpus. In Proceedings of the International Lexical Functional Grammar Conference (LFG 2003), Saratoga Springs, NY.
7. Kilian Foth. 2003. Eine umfassende Dependenzgrammatik des Deutschen. Technical report, Fachbereich Informatik, Universität Hamburg.
8. Chung-Hye Han, Na-Rae Han, and Eon-Suk Ko. 2001. Bracketing guidelines for Penn Korean TreeBank. Technical report, University of Pennsylvania.
9. Dan Klein and Christopher D. Manning. 2003. Accurate unlexicalized parsing. In Proceedings of the 41st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2003), pages 423-430, Sapporo, Japan.
10. Sandra Kübler and Heike Telljohann. 2002. Towards a dependency-based evaluation for partial parsing. In Proceedings of the LREC-Workshop Beyond PARSEVAL-Towards Improved Evaluation Measures for Parsing Systems, pages 9-16, Las Palmas, Gran Canaria.
11. Sandra Kübler. 2005. How do treebank annotation schemes influence parsing results? Or how not to compare apples and oranges. In Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Recent Advances in Natural Language Processing (RANLP 2005), pages 293-300, Borovets, Bulgaria.
12. V. I. Levenshtein. 1966. Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Soviet Physics, 10:707-710.
13. Dekang Lin. 1995. A dependency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. In Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI 1995), pages 1420-1425, Montreal, Canada.
14. Dekang Lin. 1998. A depedency-based method for evaluating broad-coverage parsers. Natural Language Engineering, 4(2):97-114.
15. Wolfgang Maier. 2006. Annotation schemes and their influence on parsing results. In Proceedings of the COLING/ACL 2006 Student Research Workshop, pages 19-24, Sydney, Australia.
16. Ines Rehbein and Josef van Genabith. 2007. Treebank annotation schemes and parser evaluation for German. In Proceedings of the 2007 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning (EMNLP-CoNLL 2007), pages 630-639, Prague, Czech Republic.
17. Geoffrey Sampson and Anna Babarczy. 2003. A test of the leaf-ancestor metric for parse accuracy. Journal of Natural Language Engineering, 9:365-380.
18. Michael Schiehlen. 2004. Annotation strategies for probabilistic parsing in German. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2003), Geneva, Switzerland.
19. Anne Schiller, Simone Teufel, and Christine Thielen. 1995. Guidelines für das Tagging deutscher Textkorpora mit STTS. Technical report, Universität Stuttgart, Universität Tübingen.
20. Helmut Schmid. 2000. LoPar: Design and implementation. Technical report, Universität Stuttgart.
21. Helmut Schmid. 2004. Efficient parsing of highly ambiguous context-free grammars with bit vectors. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING 2004), Geneva, Switzerland.
22. Heike Telljohann, Erhard W. Hinrichs, Sandra Kübler, and Heike Zinsmeister, 2005. Stylebook for the Tübingen Treebank of Written German (TüBa-D/Z). Universität Tübingen, Germany.
23. Yannick Versley. 2005. Parser evaluation across text types. In Proceedings of the Fourth Workshop on Treebanks and Linguistic Theories (TLT 2005), Barcelona, Spain.
24. K. Zhang and D. Shasha. 1989. Simple fast algorithms for the editing distance between trees and related problems. SIAM Journal of Computing, 18:1245-1262.