Analyses of Large Data Bases and Pragmatic Clinical Trials: Advancing Comparative Effectiveness Research in a Learning Health Care System

American Journal of Perinatology

Volumn 32, Issue 12, 2015, Pages 1095-1097

  Tyson, Jon ^a   Pedroza, Claudia ^a   Wootton, Susan H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CORTICOSTEROID; INDOMETACIN; STEROID;

ADVERSE OUTCOME; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; DATA BASE; EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; LEARNING; LUNG DYSPLASIA; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NEWBORN INTENSIVE CARE; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT CARE; PERINATAL CARE; PHOTOTHERAPY; PRENATAL PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW (TOPIC); FEMALE; INFANT MORTALITY; MALE; NEONATOLOGY; PREMATURITY; PROCEDURES;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INDOMETHACIN; INFANT MORTALITY; INFANT, EXTREMELY PREMATURE; MALE; NEONATOLOGY; PHOTOTHERAPY; STEROIDS;

EID: 84943664041     PISSN: 07351631     EISSN: 10988785     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0035-1562927     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Institute of Medicine (IOM) The Learning Healthcare System: Workshop Summary. Washington DC National Academies Press: 2007
2. Institute of Medicine Best Care at Lower Cost. The Path to Continuously Learning Health Care in America. Washington DC National Academies Press: 2013
3. Platt R., Kass N. E., McGraw D. Ethics, regulation, and comparative effectiveness research: time for a change. JAMA: 2014; 311 15 1497 1498
4. Faden R. R., Kass N. E., Goodman S. N., Pronovost P., Tunis S., Beauchamp T. L. An ethics framework for a learning health care system: a departure from traditional research ethics and clinical ethics. Hastings Cent Rep: 2013;; (Spec No): S16 S27
5. Sugarman J., Califf R. M. Ethics and regulatory complexities for pragmatic clinical trials. JAMA: 2014; 311 23 2381 2382
6. Ware J. H., Hamel M. B. Pragmatic trials-guides to better patient care? N Engl J Med: 2011; 364 18 1685 1687
7. Schwartz D., Lellouch J. Explanatory and pragmatic attitudes in therapeutical trials. J Chronic Dis: 1967; 20 8 637 648
8. Tunis S. R., Stryer D. B., Clancy C. M. Practical clinical trials: increasing the value of clinical research for decision making in clinical and health policy. JAMA: 2003; 290 12 1624 1632
9. Roberts D., Dalziel S. Antenatal corticosteroids for accelerating fetal lung maturation for women at risk of preterm birth. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2006; 3 CD004454
10. Fowlie P. W., Davis P. G., McGuire W. Prophylactic intravenous indomethacin for preventing mortality and morbidity in preterm infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2010; 7 CD000174
11. Okwundu C. I., Okoromah C. A., Shah P. S. Prophylactic phototherapy for preventing jaundice in preterm or low birth weight infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev: 2012; 1 CD007966
12. Morris B. H., Oh W., Tyson J. E., et al. NICHD Neonatal Research Network. Aggressive vs. conservative phototherapy for infants with extremely low birth weight. N Engl J Med: 2008; 359 18 1885 1896
13. Braitman L. E., Rosenbaum P. R. Rare outcomes, common treatments: analytic strategies using propensity scores. Ann Intern Med: 2002; 137 8 693 695
14. Rosenbaum P. R., Rubin D. B. Reducing bias in observational studies using subclassification on the propensity score. J Am Stat Assoc: 1984; 79 516 524
15. Austin P. C., Mamdani M. M., Stukel T. A., Anderson G. M., Tu J. V. The use of the propensity score for estimating treatment effects: administrative versus clinical data. Stat Med: 2005; 24 10 1563 1578
16. Lin D. Y., Psaty B. M., Kronmal R. A. Assessing the sensitivity of regression results to unmeasured confounders in observational studies. Biometrics: 1998; 54 3 948 963
17. Tyson J. E., Pedroza C., Langer J., et al. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Neonatal Research Network. Does aggressive phototherapy increase mortality while decreasing profound impairment among the smallest and sickest newborns? J Perinatol: 2012; 32 9 677 684
18. Arnold C., Pedroza C., Tyson J. E. Phototherapy in ELBW newborns: does it work? Is it safe? The evidence from randomized clinical trials. Semin Perinatol: 2014; 38 7 452 464
19. Lauer M. S., D'Agostino R. B. Sr. The randomized registry trial-the next disruptive technology in clinical research? N Engl J Med: 2013; 369 17 1579 1581
20. Fröbert O., Lagerqvist B., Olivecrona G. K., et al. TASTE Trial. Thrombus aspiration during ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. N Engl J Med: 2013; 369 17 1587 1597
21. Lantos J. D., Spertus J. A. The concept of risk in comparative-effectiveness research. N Engl J Med: 2014; 371 22 2129 2130
22. Faden R. R., Beauchamp T. L., Kass N. E. Informed consent, comparative effectiveness, and learning health care. N Engl J Med: 2014; 370 8 766 768
23. Schulz K. F., Grimes D. A. Sample size calculations in randomised trials: mandatory and mystical. Lancet: 2005; 365 9467 1348 1353
24. Stürmer T., Schneeweiss S., Avorn J., Glynn R. J. Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration. Am J Epidemiol: 2005; 162 3 279 289
25. Vanderweele T. J., Arah O. A. Bias formulas for sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounding for general outcomes, treatments, and confounders. Epidemiology: 2011; 22 1 42 52
26. Arah O. A., Chiba Y., Greenland S. Bias formulas for external adjustment and sensitivity analysis of unmeasured confounders. Ann Epidemiol: 2008; 18 8 637 646
27. McCandless L. C., Gustafson P., Levy A. Bayesian sensitivity analysis for unmeasured confounding in observational studies. Stat Med: 2007; 26 11 2331 2347
28. Turner R. M., Spiegelhalter D. J., Smith G. CS, Thompson S. G. Bias modelling in evidence synthesis. J R Stat Soc Ser A Stat Soc: 2009; 172 1 21 47