High-precision phenotyping under controlled versus natural environments

Phenomics in Crop Plants: Trends, Options and Limitations

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 27-40

  Basu, Partha Sarathi ^a   Srivastava, Mudit ^a   Singh, Parul ^a   Porwal, Priyanka ^a   Singh, Jagdish ^a   Kant, Rohit ^a  

^a INDIAN INSTITUTE OF PULSES RESEARCH   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943647524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-81-322-2226-2_3     Document Type: Chapter

References (82)

1. Araus JL et al (2008) Breeding for yield potential and stress adaptation in cereals. Crit Rev Plant Sci 27:1–36
2. Basu PS, Berger JD, Turner NC, Chaturvedi SK, Ali M, Siddique KHM (2007a) Osmotic adjustment of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) is not associated with changes in carbohydrate composition or leaf gas exchange under drought. Ann Appl Biol 150:217–225, Blackwell Publishers, UK
3. Basu PS, Ali M, Chaturvedi SK (2007b) Osmotic adjustment increases water uptake, remobilization of assimilates and maintains photosynthesis in chickpea under drought. Indian J Exp Biol 45:261–267
4. Blum A (2011a) Plant breeding for water–limited environments. Springer, New York
5. Blum A (2011b) Drought resistance – is it really a complex trait? Funct Plant Biol 38:753–757
6. Blum A, Munns R, Passioura JB, Turner NC (1996) Genetically engineered plants resistant to soil drying and salt stress: how to interpret osmotic relations? Plant Physiol 110:1051–1053, Acevedo, 1993
7. Cabrera-Bosquet L et al (2012) High-throughput phenotyping and genomic selection: the frontiers of crop breeding converge. J Integr Plant Biol 54:312–320
8. Cairns JE et al (2011) Influence of the soil physical environment on drought stress and its implications for drought research. Field Crop Res 121:303–310
9. Cairns JE et al (2012a) Dissecting maize productivity: ideotypes associated with grain yield under drought stress and well-watered conditions. J Integr Plant Biol 54:1007–1020
10. Cairns JE et al (2012b) Maize production in a changing climate: impacts, adaptation, and mitigation strategies. Adv Agron 114:1–58
11. Cairns JE et al (2013) Adapting maize production to climate change in sub-Saharan Africa. Food Sec 5:345–360
12. Chapman SC, Edmeades GO (1999) Selection improves drought tolerance in tropical maize populations: II. Direct and correlated responses among secondary traits. Crop Sci 39:1315–1324
13. Cobb JN et al (2013) Next-generation phenotyping: requirements and strategies for enhancing our understanding of genotype – phenotype relationships and its relevance to crop improvement. Theor Appl Genet 126:867–887
14. Costa JM et al (2013) Thermography to explore plant–environment interactions. J Exp Bot 64:3937–3949
15. Ferrio JP, Mateo MA, Bort J, Abdalla O, Voltas J, Araus JL (2007) Relationships of grain D13C and D18O with wheat phenology and yield under water- limited conditions. Ann Appl Biol 150:207–215
16. Fiorani F, Rascher U, Jahnke S, Schurr U (2012) Imaging plants dynamics in heterogenic environments. Curr Opin Biotech 23:227–235
17. Fischer RA, Maurer R (1978) Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust J Agric Res 29:892–912
18. Fischer RA, Rees D, Sayre KD, Lu ZM, Condon AG, Larque Saavedra A (1998) Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate, and cooler canopies. Crop Sci 38:1467–1475
19. Frascaroli E, Tuberosa R (1993) Effect of abscisic acid on pollen germination and tube growth of maize genotypes. Plant Breed 110:250–254
20. Fuentes S et al (2012) Computational water stress indices obtained from thermal image analysis of grapevine canopies. Irrig Sci 30:523–536
21. Gleadow R et al (2013) Crops for a future climate. Funct Plant Biol 40:iii–vi
22. Grant OM, Chaves MM, Jones HG (2006) Optimizing thermal imaging as a technique for detecting stomatal closure induced by drought stress under greenhouse conditions. Physiol Plant 127:507–518
23. Grant OM, Tronina L, Jones HG, Chaves MM (2007) Exploring thermal imaging variables for the detection of stress responses in grapevine under different irrigation regimes. J Exp Bot 58:815–825
24. Gray SB, Dermody O, DeLucia EH (2010) Spectral reflectance from a soybean canopy exposed to elevated CO2 and O3. J Exp Bot 61:4413–4422
25. Gutierrez M, Reynolds MP, Klatt AR (2010) Association of water spectral indices with plant and soil water relations in contrasting wheat genotypes. J Exp Bot 61:3291–3303
26. Harris K, Subudhi PK, Borrell A, Jordan D, Rosenow D, Nguyen H, Klein P, Klein R, Mullet J (2007) Sorghum stay-green QTL individually reduce post-flowering drought-induced leaf senescence. J Exp Bot 58:327–338
27. Hatfield JL, Gitelson AA, Schepers JS, Walthall CL (2008) Application of spectral remote sensing for agronomic decisions. Agron J 100:S117–S131
28. Hose E, Clarkson DT, Steudle E, Schreiber L, Hartung W (2001) The exodermis: a variable apoplastic barrier. J Exp Bot 52:2245–2264
29. Izanloo A, Condon AG, Langridge P, Tester M, Schnurbusch T (2008) Different mechanisms of adaptation to cyclic water stress in two South Australian bread wheat cultivars. J Exp Bot 59:3327–3346
30. Jones HG (2007) Monitoring plant and soil water status: established and novel methods revisited and their relevance to studies of drought tolerance. J Exp Bot 58:119–130
31. Kakani VG, Reddy RK, Koti S, Wallace TP, Prasad PVV, Reddy VR, Zhao D (2005) Differences in in vitro pollen germination and pollen tube growth of cotton cultivars in response to high temperatures. Ann Bot 96:607–612
32. Kalapos T, Van den Boogaard R, Lambers H (1996) Effect of soil drying on growth, biomass allocation and leaf gas exchange of two annual grass species. Plant Soil 185:137–149
33. Kashiwagi J, Krishnamurthy L, Crouch JH, Serraj R (2006) Variability of root length density and its contributions to seed yield in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) under terminal drought stress. Field Crop Res 95:171–181
34. Kholova J, Hash CT, Kakkera A, Kocova M, Vadez V (2010a) Constitutive water – conserving mechanisms are correlated with the terminal drought tolerance of pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br.]. J Exp Bot 61:369–377
35. Kholova J, Hash CT, Kumar PL, Yadav RS, Kocova M, Vadez V (2010b) Terminal drought – tolerant pearl millet [Pennisetum glaucum (L.)] R.Br.have high leaf ABA and limit transpiration at high vapour pressure deficit. J Exp Bot 61:1431–1440
36. Landi P, Conti S, Gherardi F, Sanguineti MC, Tuberosa R (1995) Genetic analysis of leaf ABA concentration and of agronomic traits in maize hybrids grown under different water regimes. Maydica 40:179–186
37. Mace ES, Singh V, VanOosterom EJ, Hammer GL, Hunt CH, Jordan DR (2012) QTL for nodal root angle in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L. Moench) co-locate with QTL for traits associated with drought adaptation. Theor Appl Genet 124:97–109
38. Maes WH, Steppe K (2012) Estimating evapotranspiration and drought stress with ground-based thermal remote sensing in agriculture: a review. J Exp Bot 63:4671–4712
39. Masuka B et al (2012) Deciphering the code: successful abiotic stress phenotyping for molecular breeding. J Integr Plant Biol 54:238–249
40. Monneveux P, Ribaut J-M (2006) Secondary traits for drought tolerance improvement in cereals. In: Ribaut J-M (ed) Drought adaptation cereals. The Haworth Press, Binghamton, pp 97–143
41. Montes J, Melchinger A, Reif J (2007) Novel throughput phenotyping platforms in plant genetic studies. Trends Plant Sci 12:433–436
42. Olivares-Villegas JJ, Reynolds MP, McDonald GK (2007) Drought-adaptive attributes in the Seri/Babax hexaploid wheat population. Funct Plant Biol 34:189–203
43. Passioura JB (1977) Grain yield, harvest index and water use of wheat. J Aust Inst Agric Sci 43:117–120
44. Passioura JB (2006) The perils of pot experiments. Funct Plant Biol 33:1075–1079
45. Passioura JB (2010) Scaling up: the essence of effective agricultural research. Funct Plant Biol 37:585–591
46. Passioura JB (2012) Phenotyping for drought tolerance in grain crops: when is it useful to breeders? Funct Plant Biol 39:851–859
47. Pieruschka R, Poorter H (2012) Phenotyping plants:genes, phenes and machines. Funct Plant Biol 39:813–820
48. Pinto RS, Reynolds MP, Mathews KL, McIntyre CL, Olivares– Villegas JJ, Chapman SC (2010) Heat and drought adaptive QTL in a wheat population designed to minimize confounding agronomic effects. Theor Appl Genet 121:1001–1021
49. Poorter H, Buhler J, van Dusschoten D, Climent J, Postma JA (2012) Pot size matters: a meta-analysis of the effects of rooting volume on plant growth. Funct Plant Biol 39:839–850
50. Poorter HH, Farquhar GD (1994) Transpiration, intercellular carbon dioxide concentration and carbon-isotope discrimination of 24 wild species differing in relative growth rate. Aust J Plant Physiol 21:507–516
51. Prashar A, Jones HG (2014) Infra-red thermography as a high-throughput tool for field phenotyping. Agronomy 4:397–417
52. Pratap A, Basu PS, Gupta S, Malviya N, Rajan N, Tomar R, Latha M, Nadarajan N, Singh NP (2014) Identification and characterization of sources for photo- and thermo-insensitivity in Vigna species. Plant Breed (in press)
53. Rebetzke GJ, Ellis MH, Bonnett DG, Richards RA (2007) Molecular mapping of genes for coleoptiles growth in bread wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Theor Appl Genet 114:1173–1183
54. Rebetzke GJ et al (2013) A multisite managed environment facility for targeted trait and germplasm phenotyping. Funct Plant Biol 40:1–13
55. Reynolds M, Manes Y, Izanloo A, Langridge P (2009) Phenotyping approaches for physiological breeding and gene discovery in wheat. Ann Appl Biol 155:309–320
56. Reynolds MP et al (eds) (2012) Physiological breeding I:interdisciplinary approaches to improve crop adaptation, CIMMYT Richards RA (2006) Physiological traits used in the breeding of new cultivars for water-scarce environments. Agric Water Manag 80:197–211
57. Richards RA, Watt M, Rebetzke GJ (2007) Physiological traits and cereal germplasm for sustainable agricultural systems. Euphytica 154:409–425
58. Romer C et al (2011) Robust fitting of fluorescence spectra for pre-symptomatic wheat leaf rust detection with support vector machines. Comput Electron Agric 79:180–188
59. Ruta N, Liedgen M, Fracheboud Y, Stamp P, Hund A (2010) QTLs for the elongation of axile and lateral roots of maize in response to low water potential. Theor Appl Genet 120:621–631
60. Sabadin PK, Malosetti M, Boer MP, Tardin FD, Santos FG, Guimaraes CT, Gomide RL, Andrade CLT, Albuquerque PEP, Caniato FF, Mollinari M, Margarido GRA, Oliveira BF, Schaffert RE, Garcia AAF, va Eeuwijk FA, Magalhaes JV (2012) Studying the genetic basis of drought tolerance in sorghum by manage stress trials and adjustments for phonological and plant height differences. Theor Appl Genet 124:1389–1402
61. Sadras VO, Reynolds MP, de laVega AJ, Petrie PR, Robinson R (2009) Phenotypic plasticity of yield and phenology in wheat, sunflower and grapevine. Field Crop Res 110:242–250
62. Seiler C, Harshavardhan VT, Rajesh K, Reddy PS, Strickert M, Rolletschek H, Scholz U, Wobus U, Sreenivasulu N (2011) ABA biosynthesis and degradation contributing to ABA homeostasis during barley seed development under control and terminal droughtstress conditions. J Exp Bot 62:2615–2632
63. Setter TL (2006) The role of abscisic acid under water-limited conditions. In: Ribaut J-M (ed) Drought adaptation in cereals. The Haworth Press, Binghamton, pp 505–530
64. Sharp RE, Poroyko V, Hejlek LG, Spollen WG, Springer GK, Bohnert HJ, Nguyen HT (2004) Root growth maintenance during water deficits: physiology to functional genomics. J Exp Bot 55:2343–2351
65. Shi L, Shi TX, Broadley MR, White PJ, Long Y, Meng JL, Xu FS, Hammond JP (2013) High-throughput root phenotyping screens identify genetic loci associated with root architectural traits in Brassica napus under contrasting phosphate availabilities. Ann Bot 112:381–389
66. Shukla AK, Ladha JK, Singh VK, Dwivedi BS, Balasubramanian V, Gupta RK, Sharma SK, Singh Y, Pathak H, Pandey PS, Padre AT, Yadav RL (2004) Calibrating the leaf color chart for nitrogen management indifferent genotype of rice and wheat in a systems perspective. Agron J 96:1606–1621
67. Staedler YM, Masson D, Schoenenberger J (2013) Plant tissues in 3D via X-ray tomography: simple contrasting methods allow high resolution imaging. PLoS ONE 8:e75295
68. Subbarao GV, Johansen C, Slinkard AE, Rao RCN, Saxena NP, Chauhan YS (1995) Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Crit Rev Plant Sci 14:469–523
69. Trachsel S, Kaeppler SM, Brown KM, Lynch JP (2011) Shovelomics: high throughput phenotyping of maize (Zea mays L.) root architecture in the field. Plant Soil 341:75–87
70. Vadez V, Deshpande SP, Kholova J, Hammer GL, Borrell AK, Talwar HS, Hash CT (2011) Stay-green quantitative trait loci’s effects on water extraction, transpiration efficiency and seed yield depend on recipient parent background. Funct Plant Biol 38:553–566
71. Von Mogel KH (2013) Taking the phenomics revolution into the field. CSA News, March, pp 4–10
72. Wasilewska A, Vlad F, Sirichandra C, Redko Y, Jammes F, Valon C, Frey NFD, Leung J (2008) An update on abscisic acid signaling in plants and more. Mol Plant 1:198–217
73. Weber VS et al (2012) Efficiency of managed-stress screening of elite maize hybrids under drought and low nitrogen for yield under rainfed conditions in Southern Africa. Crop Sci 52:1011–1020
74. White JW, Andrade-Sanchez P, Gore MA, Bronson KF, Coffelt TA, Conley MM, Feldmann KA, French AN, Heun JT, Hunsaker DJ, Jenks MA, Kimball BA, Roth RL, Strand RJ, Thorp KR, Wall GW, Wang GY (2012) Field- based phenomics for plant genetics research. Field Crop Res 133:101–112
75. Whitmore AP, Whalley WR (2009) Physical effects of soil drying on roots and crop growth. J Exp Bot 60:2845–2857
76. Winterhalter L, Mistele B, Jampatong S, Schmidhalter U (2011) High throughput phenotyping of canopy water mass and canopy temperature in well-watered and drought stressed tropical maize hybrids in the vegetative stage. Eur J Agron 35:22–32
77. Xiong YC, Li FM, Zhang T, Xia C (2007) Evolution mechanism of non-hydraulic root-to-shoot signal during the anti-drought genetic breeding of spring wheat. Environ Exp Bot 59:193–205
78. Zaman-Allah M, Jenkinson DM, Vadez V (2011a) A conservative pattern of water use, rather than deep or profuse rooting, is critical for the terminal drought tolerance of chickpea. J Exp Bot 62:4239–4252
79. Zaman-Allah M, Jenkinson DM, Vadez V (2011b) Chickpea genotypes contrasting for seed yield under terminal drought stress in the field differ for traits related to the control of water use. Funct Plant Biol 38:270–281
80. Zhang H, Tan GLL, Yang LNN, Yang JC, Zhang JH, Zhao BH (2009) Hormones in the grains and roots in relation to post-anthesis development of inferior and superior spikelets in japonica/indica hybrid rice. Plant Physiol Biochem 47:195–204
81. Zheng BY, Shi LJ, Ma YT, Deng QY, Li BG, Guo Y (2008) Comparison of architecture among different cultivars of hybrid rice using a spatial light model based on 3-D digitising. Funct Plant Biol 35:900–910
82. Zheng HJ, Wu AZ, Zheng CC, Wang YF, Cai R, Shen XF, Xu RR, Liu P, Kong LJ, Dong ST (2009) QTL mapping of maize (Zea mays) stay-green traits and their relationship to yield. Plant Breed 128:54–62