Bounding the climate viability of natural gas as a bridge fuel to displace coal

Energy Policy

Volumn 86, Issue , 2015, Pages 286-294

  Hausfather, Zeke ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Berkeley Earth   (United States)

Author keywords

Bridge fuel; Carbon dioxide; Climate change; Coal; Methane; Natural gas

Indexed keywords

ATMOSPHERIC RADIATION; CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COAL; ELECTRIC POWER GENERATION; EMISSION CONTROL; GREENHOUSE GASES; METHANE; NATURAL GAS;

CLIMATE IMPACTS; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ELECTRICITY GENERATION EFFICIENCIES; METHANE EMISSIONS; METHANE LEAKAGE; NATURAL GAS INFRASTRUCTURE; RADIATIVE FORCINGS; SCALE TRANSITION;

GAS EMISSIONS;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; COAL; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; METHANE; NATURAL GAS; RADIATIVE FORCING;

EID: 84943601314     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2015.07.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Alvarez R.A., Pacala S.W., Winebrake J.J., Chameides W.L., Hamburg, S.P. Greater focus needed on methane leakage from natural gas infrastructure. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2012, 109:6435-6440.
2. Arent D., et al. Chapter 10: Key economic sectors and services. Climate changeimpacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Section 10.9.
3. Brandt A.R., Heath G.A., Kort E.A., O'Sullivan F., Pétron G., Jordaan S.M., Tans P., Wilcox J., Gopstein A.M., Arent D., Wofsy S., Brown N.J., Bradley R., Stucky G.D., Eardley D., Harriss R. Methane leaks from north american natural gas systems. Science 2014, 343:733-735.
4. Cathles L.M., Brown L., Taam M., Hunter A. A commentary on "The greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas in shale formations" by R.W. Howarth, R. Santoro and Anthony Ingraffea. Clim. Chang. 2012, 113:525-535. (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10584-011-0333-0).
5. Center for Climate and Energy Solutions (C2E2), 2013. Leveraging Natural Gas to Reduce Greenhouse Gas Emissions.
6. Colorado Department of Public Heath and Enviroment (DPHE), 2014. Regulation Number 3: Stationary Source Permitting and Air Pollution Emission Notice Requirements. Air Quality Control Commission.
7. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy, 2014. Shale Gas Production: Billion Cubic Feet. Office of Oil and Gas. Available at: (accessed 10.26.14). http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_prod_shalegas_s1_a.htm.
8. Energy Information Administration (EIA), U.S. Department of Energy, 2013. Table 8.1. Average Operating Heat Rate for Selected Energy Sources. Electric Power Annual.
9. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S., 2011. Regulatory Impact Analysis of the Proposed Toxics Rule, Mar. 2011.
10. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), U.S., 2014. Inventory of U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks: 1990-2012.
11. Hart E.K., Jacobson A. A Monte Carlo approach to generator portfolio planning and carbon emissions assessments of systems with large penetrations of variable renewables. Renew. Energy 2011, 36:2278-2286.
12. Hayhoe K., Kheshgi H.S., Jain A.K., Wuebbles D.J. Substitution of natural gas for coal: climatic effects of utility sector emissions. Clim. Chang. 2002, 54:107-139.
13. Howarth R.W., Santoro R., Ingraffea A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas from shale formations. Clim. Chang. 2011, 106:679-690.
14. Howarth R.W. A bridge to nowhere: methane emissions and the greenhouse gas footprint of natural gas. Energy Sci. Eng. 2014.
15. ICF International, 2014. Economic Analysis of Methane Emission Reduction Opportunities in the U.S. Onshore Oil and Natural Gas Industries. Prepared for the Environmental Defense Fund.
16. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2011. World Energy Outlook 2011: Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas?
17. International Energy Agency (IEA), 2012. Technology Roadmap: High-Efficiency, Low-Emissions Coal-Fired Power Generation.
18. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis (IIASA), 2014. AR5 Scenario Database: AMPERE WP2+3, MESSAGE model, AMPERE3-450 scenario. Available at (accessed 10.16.14). https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AMPEREDB/.
19. Joos F., Bruno M., Fink R., Stocker T.F., Siegenthaler U., Le Quéré C., Sarmiento J.L. An efficient and accurate representation of complex oceanic and biospheric models of anthropogenic carbon uptake. Tellus 1996, 48B:397-417.
20. Joos F., Bruno M. Pulse response functions are cost-efficient tools to model the link between carbon emissions, atmospheric CO2 and global warming. Phys. Chem. Earth 1996, 21:476.
21. Karion A., et al. Methane emissions estimate from airborne measurements over a western United States natural gas field. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2013, 40:4393-4397.
22. Levi M. Climate consequences of natural gas as a bridge fuel. Clim. Chang. 2013, 118:609-623.
23. McJeon H., Edmonds J., Bauer N., Clarke L., Fisher B., Flannery B.P., Hilaire J., Krey V., Marangoni G., Mi R., Riahi K., Rogner H., Tavoni M. Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas. Nature 2014, 514:482-485. Advance online publication, 15/10/14.
24. Miller S.M., et al. Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. (PNAS) 2013, 110:20018-20022.
25. Myhre G., Highwood E.J., Shine K.P., Stordal F. New estimates of radiative forcing due to well mixed greenhouse gases. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1998, 25(14):2715-2718.
26. Myhre G., et al. Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and Natural Radiative Forcing. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA.
27. Myhre G., et al. Chapter 8: Anthropogenic and natural radiative forcing: supplementary material. contribution of working group i to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change 2013, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA, Section 8.5, 693-700, Table 8.SM.1 and 8.SM.6.
28. Myhrvold N.P., Caldeira K. Greenhouse gases, climate change and the transition from coal to low-carbon electricity. Environ. Resour. Lett. 2012, 7:14-18.
29. National Energy Technology Laboratory (NETL), 2013. Cost and Performance Baseline for Fossil Energy Plants, Volume 1: Bituminous Coal and Natural Gas to Electricity. Revision 2a.
30. Peischl J., et al. Quantifying atmospheric methane emissions from the Haynesville, Fayetteville, and northeastern Marcellus shale gas production regions. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2015, 120(5):2119-2139.
31. Petron G., et al. A new look at methane and nonmethane hydrocarbon emissions from oil and natural gas operations in the Colorado Denver-Julesburg Basin. J. Geophys. Res.: Atmos. 2012, 119(11):6836-6852.
32. Pierrehumbert R.T. Short-lived climate pollution. Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci. 2014, 42:341-379.
33. 2 uptake in an ocean general circulation model. J. Geophys. Res.-Ocean. 1992, 97:3621-3645.
34. Saunier, S., Haugland, T., Pederstad, A., 2014. Quantifying cost-effectiveness of systematic leak detection and repair programs using infrared cameras. Report for the Clean Air Task Force by Carbon Limits 2014.
35. Schneising O., Burrows J., Dickerson R., Buchwitz M., Reuter M., Bovensmann H. Remote sensing of fugitive methane emissions from oil and gas production in north american tight geologic formations. Earth's Futur. 2014, 2(10):548-558.
36. Schwietzke S., Griffin W.M., Matthews H.S., Bruhwiler L.M.P. Natural gas fugitive emissions rates constrained by global atmospheric methane and ethane. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2014, 48(14):7714-7722.
37. 2 emissions. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9:9.
38. Shindell D.T., Faluvegi G., Koch D.M., Schmidt G.A., Unger N., Bauer S.E. Improved attribution of climate forcing to emissions. Science 2009, 326(5953):716-718.
39. Shindell D., et al. Simultaneously mitigating near-term climate change and improving human health and food security. Science 2012, 335:183-189.
40. Shires T.M., Loughran C.J., Jones S., Hopkins E. Compendium of greenhouse gas emissions methodologies for the oil and natural gas industry. Prepared by URS Corporation for the American Petroleum Institute (API) 2009, API, Washington DC.
41. Shoemaker J.K., Schrag D.P. The danger of overvaluing methane's influence on future climate change. Clim. Chang. 2013, 120(4):903-914.
42. Spath P.L., Mann M.K. Life Cycle Assessment of a Natural Gas Combined-Cycle Power Generation System 2000, 570-27715. National Renewable Energy Laboratory, USA.
43. Wigley T.M. Coal to gas: the influence of methane leakage. Clim. Chang. Lett. 2011, 108:601-608.
44. 2 Greenhouse Gases: Scientific Understanding, Control and Implementation 2000, 425-432. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Netherlands. J. van Ham (Ed.).
45. Zhang X., Myhrvold N.P., Caldeira K. Key factors for assessing climate benefits of natural gas versus coal electricity generation. Environ. Res. Lett. 2014, 9:11.