Limited impact on decadal-scale climate change from increased use of natural gas

Nature

Volumn 514, Issue 7253, 2014, Pages 482-485

  McJeon, Haewon ^a   Edmonds, Jae ^a   Bauer, Nico ^b   Clarke, Leon ^a   Fisher, Brian ^c   Flannery, Brian P ^d   Hilaire, Jérôme ^b   Krey, Volker ^e   Marangoni, Giacomo ^f   Mi, Raymond ^c   Riahi, Keywan ^e   Rogner, Holger ^e   Tavoni, Massimo ^f  

^a PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^b POTSDAM INSTITUTE FOR CLIMATE IMPACT RESEARCH   (Germany)

^c BAEconomics Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^d RESOURCES FOR THE FUTURE   (United States)

^e INTERNATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR APPLIED SYSTEMS ANALYSIS   (Austria)

^f Fondazione Eni Enrico Mattei (FEEM) and Centro Euro Mediterraneo sui Cambiamenti Climatici (CMCC)   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

NATURAL GAS; CARBON DIOXIDE;

ASSESSMENT METHOD; CARBON DIOXIDE ENRICHMENT; CLIMATE CHANGE; CLIMATE FORCING; DECADAL VARIATION; ENERGY MARKET; GLOBAL PERSPECTIVE; HYDRAULIC FRACTURING; SHALE GAS;

ARTICLE; CARBON FOOTPRINT; CLIMATE CHANGE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENERGY; ENERGY CONSUMPTION; ENERGY RESOURCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATIVE FORCING; ECONOMICS; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; SUPPLY AND DISTRIBUTION; THEORETICAL MODEL; TIME; UTILIZATION;

NORTH AMERICA;

CARBON DIOXIDE; CLIMATE CHANGE; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; MODELS, THEORETICAL; NATURAL GAS; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84921348422     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature13837     Document Type: Article

References (98)

1. Sovacool, B. K. Cornucopia or curse? Reviewing the costs and benefits of shale gas hydraulic fracturing (fracking). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 37, 249-264 (2014).
2. International Energy Agency. Are We Entering a Golden Age of Gas? (IEA Report, 2011).
3. Hultman, N., Rebois, D., Scholten, M. & Ramig, C. The greenhouse impact of unconventional gas for electricity generation. Environ. Res. Lett. 6, 044008 (2011).
4. Moniz, E. J. et al. The Future of Natural Gas: An Interdisciplinary MIT Study (MIT, 2011); http://mitei.mit.edu/system/files/NaturalGas-Report.pdf.
5. Brown, S., Krupnick, A. & Walls, M. Natural Gas: a Bridge to a Low-Carbon Future (Resource for the Future, 2009); http://www.rff.org/RFF/Documents/RFF-IB-09-11.pdf.
6. Levi, M. Climate consequences of natural gas as a bridge fuel. Clim. Change 118, 609-623 (2013).
7. Howarth, R. W., Santoro, R. & Ingraffea, A. Methane and the greenhouse-gas footprint of natural gas fromshale formations. Clim. Change106,679-690(2011).
8. Howarth, R. W., Ingraffea, A. & Engelder, T. Natural gas: should fracking stop? Nature 477, 271-275 (2011).
9. Newell, R. G.&Raimi, D. Implications of shale gas development for climate change. Environ. Sci. Technol. 48, 8360-8368 (2014).
10. Energy Modeling Forum. Changing the game? Emissions and Market Implications of New Natural Gas Supplies EMF Report 26 (EMF, 2013); https://web.stanford.edu/ group/emf-research/docs/emf26/Summary26.pdf.
11. Edmonds, J. A. et al. in Climate Change Modeling Methodology 169-209 (Springer, 2012).
12. Rogner, H. et al. in Global Energy Assessment 423-512 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
13. Mi, R. & Fisher, B. S. BAEGEM Model Documentation (BAEconomics, 2014); http://www.baeconomics.com.au/wp-content/uploads/2014/02/BAEGEMdocumentation- 21Feb14.pdf.
14. Calvin, K. et al. GCAM Wiki Documentation (Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, 2011); http://wiki.umd.edu/gcam/.
15. Riahi, K., Grü bler, A. & Nakicenovic, N. Scenarios of long-termsocio-economic and environmental development under climate stabilization. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change 74, 887-935 (2007).
16. Bauer, N. et al. Global fossil energy markets and climate change mitigation-an analysis with REMIND. Clim. Change (in the press).
17. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Galeotti, M., Massetti, E. & Tavoni, M. A world induced technical change hybrid model. Energy J. 27, 13-37 (2006).
18. Van Vuuren, D. P. et al. The representative concentration pathways: an overview. Clim. Change 109, 5-31 (2011).
19. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Climate Change 2013: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (eds Stocker, T. F. et al.) (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2013).
20. Bauer, N. et al. CO2 emission mitigation and fossil fuel markets: dynamic and international aspects of climate policies. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (in the press).
21. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories (IPCC report, 2006); http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/ public/2006gl/.
22. Meinshausen, M., Raper, S. C. B.& Wigley, T. M. L.Emulating coupled atmosphereocean and carbon cycle models with a simpler model, MAGICC6: Part I-model description and calibration. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 11, 1417-1456 (2011).
23. Environmental Protection Agency Inventory of Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Sinks 1990-2009 (EPA Publication 430-R-11-005, 2011); http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US-GHG-Inventory-2011-Complete-Report.pdf.
24. Venkatesh, A., Jaramillo, P., Griffin, W. M. & Matthews, H. S. Uncertainty in life cycle greenhouse gasemissions fromUnited States natural gas end-uses and its effects on policy. Environ. Sci. Technol. 45, 8182-8189 (2011).
25. Burnham, A. et al. Life-cycle greenhouse gas emissions of shale gas, natural gas, coal, and petroleum. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 619-627 (2012).
26. Laurenzi, I. J. & Jersey, G. R. Life cycle greenhouse gas emissions and freshwater consumption ofMarcellus shale gas. Environ. Sci. Technol. 47, 4896-4903 (2013).
27. Miller, S. M. et al. Anthropogenic emissions of methane in the United States. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 20018-20022 (2013).
28. Brandt, A. et al. Methane leaks from North American natural gas systems. Science 343, 733-735 (2014).
29. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123, 353-367 (2014).
30. Calvin, K. et al. The role of Asia in mitigating climate change: results from the Asia modeling exercise. Energy Econ. 34, S251-S260 (2012).
31. Riahi, K. et al. Locked into Copenhagen pledges-implications of short-term emission targets for the cost and feasibility of long-term climate goals. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change (in the press).
32. Nordhaus, W. D. & Boyer, J. G. Requiem for Kyoto: an economic analysis of the Kyoto Protocol. Energy J. 20, 93-130 (1999).
33. Skone, T. J. Life Cycle Analysis: Natural Gas Combined Cycle (NGCC) Power Plant (National Energy Technology Laboratory, 2010); http://www.netl.doe.gov/ile%20Library/Research/Energy%20Analysis/Life%20Cycle%20Analysis/NGCC-LCA-Final-Report-Report-9-30-10-Final-Rev-2.pdf.
34. McCollum, D., Bauer, N., Calvin, K., Kitous, A. & Riahi, K. Fossil resource and energy security dynamics in conventional and carbon-constrained worlds. Clim. Change 123, 413-426 (2014).
35. Messner, S. & Strubegger, M. User's Guide for MESSAGE III (International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, 1995).
36. Luderer, G., Leimbach, M., Bauer, N. & Kriegler, E. Description of the ReMIND-R model. (Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, 2011); http://www.pik-potsdam.de/research/sustainable-solutions/models/remind/REMIND-Description.pdf.
37. Integrated Assessment Modeling ConsortiumIPCC AR5 Scenario Database (IAMC, 2014); https://secure.iiasa.ac.at/web-apps/ene/AR5DB/.
38. Reilly, J. M., Edmonds, J. A., Gardner, R. H. & Brenkert, A. L. Uncertainty analysis of the IEA/ORAU CO2 emissions model. Energy J. 8, 1-29 (1987).
39. Scott, M. J., Sands, R. D., Edmonds, J., Liebetrau, A. M. & Engel, D. W. Uncertainty in integrated assessment models: modeling with MiniCAM 1.0. Energy Policy 27, 855-879 (1999).
40. Meehl, G., Covey, C., McAvaney, B., Latif, M. & Stouffer, R. Overview of the coupled model intercomparison project (CMIP). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 86, 89-93 (2005).
41. Hertel, T. W. & Hertel, T. W. Global Trade Analysis: Modeling and Applications (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1999).
42. Hanoch, G. CRESH production functions. Econometrica 39, 695-712 (1971).
43. Harrison, J., Horridge, J., Jerie, M. & Pearson, K. GEMPACK Manual (2012); http:// www.copsmodels.com/gpmanual.htm.
44. Aguiar, A., McDougall, R. & Narayanan, B. Global Trade, Assistance and Production: The GTAP 8 Data Base (Center for Global Trade Analysis, Purdue Univ., 2012).
45. International Energy Agency. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 2012 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012).
46. International Energy Agency. Emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs and SF6 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012).
47. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change 2012 Annex I Party GHG Inventory Submissions (UNFCCC, 2012).
48. Environmental Protection Agency. Global Anthropogenic Non-CO2 Greenhouse Gas Emissions: 1990-2030 (US Environmental Protection Agency, 2012).
49. Wigley, T. M. MAGICC/SCENGEN 5.3: User Manual Version 2 (NCAR, 2008).
50. International Energy Agency. CO2 Emissions from Fuel Combustion 1971-2001 (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2012).
51. Weyant, J. P., de la Chesnaye, F. C. & Blanford, G. J. Overview of EMF-21: multigas mitigation and climate policy. Energy J. 27, 1-32 (2006).
52. Edmonds, J. & Reilly, J. Global energy production and use to the year 2050. Energy 8, 419-432 (1983).
53. Edmonds, J.& Reilly, J. Global energy andCO2 to the year 2050. Energy J. 4, 21-47 (1983).
54. Edmonds, J. & Reilly, J. A long-term global energy-economic model of carbon dioxide release from fossil fuel use. Energy Econ. 5, 74-88 (1983).
55. Wise, M. et al. Implications of limiting CO2 concentrations for land use and energy. Science 324, 1183-1186 (2009).
56. Thomson, A. M. et al. RCP4.5: a pathway for stabilization of radiative forcing by 2100. Clim. Change 109, 77-94 (2011).
57. Clarke, J. F. & Edmonds, J. A. Modelling energy technologies in a competitive market. Energy Econ. 15, 123-129 (1993).
58. Boden, T. A., Marland, G. & Andres, R. J. Global, Regional, and National Fossil-Fuel CO2 Emissions (Carbon Dioxide Information Analysis Center, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, US Department of Energy, 2009).
59. International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of OECD Countries (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013).
60. International Energy Agency. Energy Balances of Non-OECD Countries (Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2013).
61. Lamarque, J.-F. et al. Historical (1850-2000) gridded anthropogenic and biomass burning emissions of reactive gases and aerosols: methodology and application. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10, 7017-7039 (2010).
62. Messner, S. & Schrattenholzer, L. MESSAGE-MACRO: linking an energy supply model with a macroeconomic module and solving it iteratively. Energy 25, 267-282 (2000).
63. Rao, S. & Riahi, K. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Energy J. 27, 177-200 (2006).
64. Manne, A., Mendelsohn, R. & Richels, R. MERGE: a model for evaluating regional and global effects of GHG reduction policies. Energy Policy 23, 17-34 (1995).
65. Wigley, T. & Raper, S. Implications for climate and sea level of revised IPCC emissions scenarios. Nature 357, 293-300 (1992).
66. Arthur, W. B. Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ. J. 99, 116-131 (1989).
67. O'Neill, B. C., Riahi, K. & Keppo, I. Mitigation implications of midcentury targets that preserve long-term climate policy options. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 107, 1011-1016 (2010).
68. Riahi, K. et al. Energy pathways for sustainable development. In Global Energy Assessment 1203-1306 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
69. International Energy Agency. World Energy Outlook 2008 (International Energy Agency, 2008).
70. Riahi, K., Rubin, E. S. & Schrattenholzer, L. Prospects for carbon capture and sequestration technologies assuming their technological learning. Energy 29, 1309-1318 (2004).
71. Ramage, M. & Katzer, J. Liquid Transportation Fuels from Coal and Biomass: Technological Status, Costs, and Environmental Impacts (National Academies Press, 2009).
72. Liu, G., Larson, E. D., Williams, R. H., Kreutz, T. G. & Guo, X.Making Fischer2Tropsch fuels andelectricity fromcoal and biomass: performance and cost analysis. Energy Fuels 25, 415-437 (2011).
73. Liu, G., Williams, R. H., Larson, E. D. & Kreutz, T. G. Design/economics of low-carbon power generation from natural gas and biomass with synthetic fuels coproduction. Energy Procedia 4, 1989-1996 (2011).
74. Global Energy Assessment GEA Scenario Database (2012); http://www.iiasa.ac.at/ web-apps/ene/geadb/.
75. Rogner, H.-H. An assessment of world hydrocarbon resources. Annu. Rev. Energy Environ. 22, 217-262 (1997).
76. Patwardhan, A. P., Gomez-Echeverri, L., Johansson, T. B. & Nakic?enovic?, N. Global Energy Assessment: Toward a Sustainable Future (Cambridge Univ. Press, 2012).
77. Weber, C. L. & Clavin, C. Life cycle carbon footprint of shale gas: review of evidence and implications. Environ. Sci. Technol. 46, 5688-5695 (2012).
78. Rao, S. & Riahi, K. The role of non-CO2 greenhouse gases in climate change mitigation: long-term scenarios for the 21st century. Energy J. 27, 177-200 (2006).
79. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Guidance and Uncertainty Management in National Greenhouse Gas Inventories 2000 (IPCC Report, 2000).
80. Nordhaus, W. D. & Yang, Z. A regional dynamic general-equilibrium model of alternative climate-change strategies. Am. Econ. Rev. 86, 741-765 (1996).
81. Leimbach, M., Bauer, N., Baumstark, L., Luken, M. & Edenhofer, O. Technological change and international trade-insights from REMIND-R. Energy J. 31, 109-136 (2010).
82. Bauer, N., Brecha, R. J. & Luderer, G. Economics of nuclear power and climate change mitigation policies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 16805-16810 (2012).
83. Luderer, G. et al. The economics of decarbonizing the energy system-results and insights fromthe RECIPEmodel intercomparison. Clim. Change 114, 9-37(2012).
84. Edenhofer, O. et al. The economics of low stabilization: model comparison of mitigation strategies and costs. Energy J. 31, 11-48 (2010).
85. Kriegler, E. et al. The role of technology for achieving climate policy objectives: overview of the EMF 27 study on global technology and climate policy strategies. Clim. Change 123, 353-367 (2014).
86. Bauer, N., Edenhofer, O.& Kypreos, S. Linking energy systemandmacroeconomic growth models. Comput. Manage. Sci. 5, 95-117 (2008).
87. Schwanitz, V. J., Piontek, F., Bertram, C. & Luderer, G. Long-term climate policy implications of phasing out fossil fuel subsidies. Energy Policy 67, 882-894 (2014).
88. Klein, D. et al. The value of bioenergy in low stabilization scenarios: an assessment using REMIND-MAgPIE. Clim. Change 123, 705-718 (2013).
89. Strefler, J., Luderer, G., Aboumahboub, T. & Kriegler, E. Economic impacts of alternative greenhouse gas emission metrics: a model-based assessment. Clim. Change (in the press).
90. International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Global Biosphere Management Model (IIASA, 2014); http://www.iiasa.ac.at/web/home/research/modelsData/GLOBIOM/GLOBIOM.en.html.
91. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Massetti, E.& Tavoni, M. International energy R&D spillovers and the economics of greenhouse gas atmospheric stabilization. Energy Econ. 30, 2912-2929 (2008).
92. Bosetti, V., Carraro, C., Duval, R. & Tavoni, M. What should we expect from innovation? A model-based assessment of the environmental and mitigation cost implications of climate-related R&D. Energy Econ. 33, 1313-1320 (2011).
93. Wigley, T. M. & Raper, S. Thermal expansion of sea water associated with global warming. Nature 330, 127-131 (1987).
94. Friedlingstein, P. et al. Climate-carbon cycle feedback analysis: results from the C4MIP model intercomparison. J. Clim. 19, 3337-3353 (2006).
95. Moss, R. H. et al. The next generation of scenarios for climate change research and assessment. Nature 463, 747-756 (2010).
96. Meinshausen, M. et al. The RCP greenhouse gas concentrations and their extensions from 1765 to 2300. Clim. Change 109, 213-241 (2011).
97. Joos, F. et al. Global warming feedbacks on terrestrial carbon uptake under the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) emission scenarios. Glob. Biogeochem. Cycles 15, 891-907 (2001).
98. Wigley, T.,Smith, S. J.&Prather, M. Radiative forcing due to reactive gas emissions. J. Clim. 15, 2690-2696 (2002).