Adult English Language Learners' Perceptions of Audience Response Systems (Clickers) as Communication Aides: A Q-Methodology Study

TESOL Journal

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2013, Pages 182-193

  Rodriguez, Lisa Ann ^a   Shepard, Maryfriend ^b  

^a Ashford University ^*  (United States)

^b WALDEN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943404102     PISSN: 10567941     EISSN: 19493533     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/tesj.69     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Adams, M., & Shinebourne, P. (2007). Q-methodology as a phenomenological research method. Existential Analysis, 18(1), 103–116.
2. Barnes, L. (2008). Lecture-free high school biology using an audience response system. The American Biology Teacher, 70(9), 531–536. doi:10.1662/0002-7685-70.9.531
3. Blood, E., & Neel, R. (2008). Using student response systems in lecture-based instruction: Does it change student engagement and learning? Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 16(3), 375–383.
4. Chen, C., Kyle, D., & McIntyre, E. (2008). Helping teachers work effectively with English language learners and their families. The School Community Journal, 18(1), 7–20.
5. City Data. (2009). Retrieved from http://www.city-data.com/city/Woodburn-Oregon.html
6. Cummins, J. (2000). Language, power, and pedagogy: Bilingual children in the crossfire. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
7. ECONorthwest. (2009). The Hispanic-White achievement gap in Oregon. Retrieved from http://www.oregon.gov/Hispanic/pdfs/FINAL_Hispanic_Gap_Report_9-1-09_1.pdf?ga=t
8. Edmonds, C., & Edmonds, T. (2008). An empirical investigation of the effects of SRS technology on introductory managerial accounting students. Issues in Accounting Education, 23, 421–434. doi:10.2308/iace.2008.23.3.421
9. Jackson, M., & Trees, A. (2007). The learning environment in clicker classrooms: Student processes of learning and involvement in large university-level courses using student response systems. Learning, Media and Technology, 32(1), 21–40.
10. Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second language acquisition and second language learning. Los Angeles, CA: Pergamon Press.
11. Krashen, S. D. (1985). Inquiries and insights. Hayward, CA: Alemany Press.
12. McKeown, B., & Thomas, D. (1988). Q methodology. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Nelson, J., & Stowell, J. (2007). Benefits of electronic audience response systems on student participation, learning, and emotion. Teaching of Psychology, 34(4), 253–258.
14. OregonLive LLC. (2011). Your schools. Retrieved from http://schools.oregonlive.com/district/Woodburn/
15. Premkumar, K., & Coupal, C. (2008). Rule of engagement—12 tips for successful use of “clickers” in the classroom. Medical Teacher, 30, 146–149. doi:10.1080/01421590801965111
16. Quiles, J. A. (2009). Introduction to Q-methodology research: Theory & design. Summer Residency, Revised readings-Q-method. Retrieved from http://laureate.ecollege.com/ec/crs/default.learn?CourseID=3455733&CPURL=la ureate.ecollege.com&Survey=1&47=2625614&ClientNodeID=991263&coursenav=0&bhcp=1
17. Salemi, M. (2009). Clickenomics: Using a classroom response system to increase student engagement in a large-enrollment principles of economics course. Journal of Economic Education, 40, 385–404. doi:10.1080/00220480903237950
18. Schooltree.Org. (2008). Woodburn High School. Retrieved from http://oregon.schooltree.org/public/Woodburn-High-072989.html.
19. Sullivan, R. (2009). Principles for constructing good clicker questions: Going beyond rote learning and stimulating active engagement with course content. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 37, 335–347. doi:10.2190/ET.37.3.i
20. TESOL. (2007). Technology standards. Retrieved from http://www.tesol.org/s_tesol/sec_document.asp?CID=86&DID=11779
21. Yourstone, S., Kraye, H., & Albaum, G. (2008). Classroom questioning with immediate electronic response: Do clickers improve learning? Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(1), 75–88. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4609.2007.00166.x