Aneuploidy rates and blastocyst formation after biopsy of morulae and early blastocysts on day 5

Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics

Volumn 32, Issue 6, 2015, Pages 925-930

  Kort, Jonathan D ^a   Lathi, Ruth B ^a   Brookfield, Kathleen ^a   Baker, Valerie L ^a   Zhao, Qianying ^a   Behr, Barry R ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Aneuploidy; Blastocyst; Fresh Transfer; Implantation; PGD

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANEUPLOIDY; ARTICLE; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; CHROMOSOME NUMBER; EMBRYO DEVELOPMENT; EMBRYO TRANSFER; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC SCREENING; HUMAN; LIVE BIRTH; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATERNAL AGE; MORULA; NIDATION; PREGNANCY; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC SCREENING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TROPHECTODERM BIOPSY; ADVERSE EFFECTS; CYTOLOGY; IN VITRO FERTILIZATION; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION GENETIC DIAGNOSIS; PROCEDURES; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; STATISTICAL MODEL; TIME FACTOR;

ANEUPLOIDY; BIOPSY; BLASTOCYST; EMBRYONIC DEVELOPMENT; FEMALE; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MORULA; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PREIMPLANTATION DIAGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84943350723     PISSN: 10580468     EISSN: 15737330     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10815-015-0475-5     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Northrop LE, Treff NR, Levy B, Scott Jr RT. SNPmicroarray-based 24 chromosome aneuploidy screening demonstrates that cleavagestage FISH poorly predicts aneuploidy in embryos that develop to morphologically normal blastocysts. MHR: Basic Sci ReprodMed. 2010; 16: 590-600.
2. Fritz MA. Perspectives on the efficacy and indications for preimplantation genetic screening: where are we now? Hum Reprod. 2008; 23: 2617-21.
3. Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Hong KH, Scott KL, Taylor D, et al. Blastocyst biopsy with comprehensive chromosome screening and fresh embryo transfer significantly increases in vitro fertilization implantation and delivery rates: a randomized controlled trial. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 697-703.
4. Scott Jr RT, Upham KM, Forman EJ, Zhao T, Treff NR. Cleavagestage biopsy significantly impairs human embryonic implantation potential while blastocyst biopsy does not: a randomized and paired clinical trial. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: 624-30.
5. RoqueM, Lattes K, Serra S, Sola I, Geber S, Carreras R, et al. Fresh embryo transfer versus frozen embryo transfer in in vitro fertilization cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertil Steril. 2013; 99: 156-62.
6. Gustin SF, Zhao Q, Behr B, Lathi RB. Leveling the playing field-embryo transfers after trophectoderm biopsy have similar outcomes in fresh and frozen cycles. Fertil Steril. 2013; 100: S194-5.
7. Capalbo A, Rienzi L, Cimadomo D, Maggiulli R, Elliot T, Wright G, et al. Correlation between standard blastocyst morphology, euploidy and implantation: an observational study in two centers involving 956 screened blastocysts. Hum Reprod. 2014; 29: 1173-81.
8. Kroener L, Ambartsumyan G, Briton-Jones C, Dumesic D, Surrey M, Munné S, et al. The effect of timing of embryonic progression on chromosomal abnormality. Fertil Steril. 2012; 98: 876-80.
9. Shapiro BS, Richter KS, Harris DC, Daneshmand ST. A comparison of day 5 and day 6 blastocyst transfers. Fertil Steril. 2001; 75: 1126-30.
10. Behr B, Gebhardt J, Lyon J, MilkiA. Factors relating to a successful cryopreserved blastocyst transfer program. Fertil Steril. 2002; 77: 697-9.
11. Kort JD, Lathi RB, Zhao Q, Behr B, Baker VL. Are Anti-müllerian hormone levels predictive of aneuploidy rates? Fertil Steril. 2014; 101(2 Supplement): e5-6.
12. Campbell A, Fishel S, Bowman N, Duffy S, Sedler M, Hickman CFL. Modelling a risk classification of aneuploidy in human embryos using non-invasive morphokinetics. Reprod BioMed Online. 2013; 26: 477-85.
13. Rienzi L, Capalbo A, Stoppa M, Romano S, Maggiulli R, Albricci L, et al. No evidence of association between blastocyst aneuploidy and morphokinetic assessment in a selected population of poorprognosis patients: a longitudinal cohort study. Reprod Biomed Online. 2015; 30(1): 57-66.
14. Gonzalez-Merino E, Emiliani S, Vassart G, Den BerghMV, Vannin AS, AbramowiczM, et al. Incidence of chromosomal mosaicism in human embryos at different developmental stages analyzed by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Genet Test. 2003; 7: 85-95.
15. Lorthongpanich T, Doris TPY, Limviphuvadh V, Knowles BB, Solter D. Developmental fate and lineage commitment of singled mouse blastomeres. Development. 2012; 139: 3722-31.
16. Tao J, Craig RH, Johnson M, Williams B, Lewis W, White J, et al. Cryopreservation of human embryos at the morula stage and outcomes after transfer. Fertil Steril. 2004; 82: 108-18.
17. Treff N, Tao X, Ferry K, Jing S, Taylor D, Scott RT. Development and validation of an accurate quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction-based assay for human blastocyst comprehensive chromosomal aneuploidy screening. Fertil Steril. 2012; 97(4): 819-24.