The study of energy metabolism in bladder cancer cells in co-culture conditions using a microfluidic chip

International Journal of Clinical and Experimental Medicine

Volumn 8, Issue 8, 2015, Pages 12327-12336

  Xu, Xiao Dong ^a   Shao, Shi Xiu ^a   Cao, Yan Wei ^a   Yang, Xue Cheng ^a   Shi, Hao Qing ^b   Wang, You Lin ^c   Xue, Sen Yao ^a   Wang, Xin Sheng ^a   Niu, Hai Tao ^a  

^a QINGDAO UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b SECOND MILITARY MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Energy metabolism; Microfluidic chip; Three dimensional cell culture; Tumorigenesis; Warburg effect

Indexed keywords

LACTIC ACID; MATRIGEL; REDUCED NICOTINAMIDE ADENINE DINUCLEOTIDE DEHYDROGENASE;

ARTICLE; BIOCHIP; BLADDER CANCER; BLADDER CANCER CELL LINE; COCULTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY METABOLISM; FIBROBLAST CULTURE; GLYCOLYSIS; HUMAN; HUMAN CELL; IMMUNOFLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; MICROFLUIDIC CHIP; OXIDATIVE PHOSPHORYLATION; PROTEIN EXPRESSION; WESTERN BLOTTING;

EID: 84943328733     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19405901     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Ferreira LM. Cancer metabolism: the Warburg effect today. Exp Mol Pathol 2010; 89: 372-380.
2. Anahan D, Weinberg RA. The hallmarks of cancer. Cell 2000; 100: 57-7.
3. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009; 324: 1029-1033.
4. DeBerardinis RJ. Is cancer a disease of abnormal cellular metabolism? New angles on an old idea. Genet Med 2008; 10: 767-77.
5. Weinhouse S, Warburg O, Burk D. On respiratory impairment in cancer cells. Science 1956; 124: 267-272.
6. Eng CH, Yu K, Lucas J, White E, Abraham RT. Ammonia derived from glutaminolysis is a diffusible regulator of autophagy. Sci Signal 2010; 3: ra31.
7. Bensaad K, Tsuruta A, Selak MA. TIGAR, a p53-inducible regulator of glycolysis and apoptosis. Cell 2006; 126: 107-120.
8. Elenbaas B, Weinberg RA. Heterotypic signaling between epithelial tumor cells and fibroblasts in carcinoma formation. Exp Cell Res 2001; 264: 169-184.
9. Tang J, Cui J, Chen R. A three-dimensional cell biology model of human hepatocellular carcinoma in vitro. Tumor Biol 2011; 32: 469-479.
10. Shiraki N, Yamazoe T, Qin Z. Efficient differentiation of embryonic stem cells into hepatic cells in vitro using a feeder-free basement membrane substratum. PLoS One 2011; 6: e24228.
11. Pennisi E. Modern symbionts inside cells mimic organelle evolution. Science 2014; 346: 532-533.
12. Radke S, Chander H, Schäfer P. Mitochondrial protein quality control by the proteasome involves ubiquitination and the protease Omi. J Biol Chem 2008; 283: 12681-12685.
13. Seo TW, Lee JS, Yoo SJ. Cellular Inhibitor of Apoptosis Protein 1 ubiquitinates endonuclease G but does not affect endonuclease G-mediated cell death. Biochem Bioph Res Co 2014; 451: 644-649.
14. Nath S, Villadsen J. Oxidative Phosphorylation Revisited. Biotechnol Bioeng 2015; 112: 429-437.
15. Schulz TJ, Thierbach R, Voigt A. Induction of oxidative metabolism by mitochondrial frataxin inhibits cancer growth Otto Warburg Revisited. J Biol Chem 2006; 281: 977-981.
16. Dalmonte ME, Forte E, Genova ML. Control of Respiration by cytochrome c oxidase in intact cells role of the membrane potential. J Biol Chem 2009; 284: 32331-32335.
17. De Bock K, Georgiadou M, Schoors S. Role of PFKFB3-driven glycolysis in vessel sproutingJ.. Cell 2013; 154: 651-663.
18. Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Lin Z, Trimmer C. Cancer cells metabolically “fertilize” the tumor microenvironment with hydrogen peroxide, driving the Warburg effect: implications for PET imaging of human tumors. Cell Cycle 2011; 10: 2504-2520.
19. Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Balliet RM, Rivadeneira DB. Oxidative stress in cancer associated fibroblasts drives tumor-stroma co-evolution: A new paradigm for understanding tumor metabolism, the field effect and genomic instability in cancer cells. Cell Cycle 2010; 9: 3256.
20. Pavlides S, Vera I, Gandara R. Warburg meets autophagy: cancer-associated fibroblasts accelerate tumor growth and metastasis via oxidative stress, mitophagy, and aerobic glycolysis. Antioxid Redox Sign 2012; 16: 1264-1284.
21. Kennedy KM, Dewhirst MW. Tumor metabolism of lactate: the influence and therapeutic potential for MCT and CD147 regulation. Future Oncol 2010; 6: 127-48.
22. Walenta S, Wetterling M, Lehrke M. High lactate levels predict likelihood of metastases, tumor recurrence, and restricted patient survival in human cervical cancers. Cancer Res 2000; 60: 916-921.
23. Zhao Z, Wu MS, Zou C, Tang Q. Downregulation of MCT1 inhibits tumor growth, metastasis and enhances chemotherapeutic efficacy in osteosarcoma through regulation of the NF-κB pathway. Cancer Lett 2014; 342: 150-8.
24. Ghesquir Lett S, Zou W, Kuchnio A. Metabolism of stromal and immune cells in health and disease. Nature 2014; 511: 167-176.
25. Anderberg C, Li H, Fredriksson L. Paracrine signaling by platelet-derived growth factor-CC promotes tumor growth by recruitment of cancer-associated fibroblasts. Cancer Res 2009; 69: 369-378.
26. Hsu TH, Kao YL, Lin WL. The migration speed of cancer cells influenced by macrophages and myofibroblasts co-cultured in a microfluidic chip. Integr Biol-Uk 2012; 4: 177-182.
27. Pupo M, Pisano A, Abonante S. GPER activates Notch signaling in breast cancer cells andcancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs). Int J Biochem Cell B 2014; 46: 56-67.
28. Ward PS, Thompson CB. Metabolic reprogramming: a cancer hallmark even warburg did not anticipate. Cancer Cell 2012; 21: 297-308.
29. Son J. Glutamine supports pancreatic cancer growth through a KRAS-regulated metabolic pathway. Nature 2013; 496: 101-105.
30. Vander Heiden MG, Cantley LC, Thompson CB. Understanding the Warburg effect: the metabolic requirements of cell proliferation. Science 2009; 324: 1029-1033.