Architectural Decision Guidance Across Projects-Problem Space Modeling, Decision Backlog Management and Cloud Computing Knowledge

Proceedings - 12th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA 2015

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 85-94

  Zimmermann, Olaf ^a   Wegmann, Lukas ^a   Koziolek, Heiko ^b   Goldschmidt, Thomas ^b  

^a University of Applied Sciences   (Switzerland)

^b ABB CORPORATE RESEARCH   (Germany)

Author keywords

agile practices; architectural decisions; architectural synthesis; cloud computing; knowledge management; patterns; UML

Indexed keywords

AIR NAVIGATION; CLOUD COMPUTING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; SOFTWARE ARCHITECTURE; UNIFIED MODELING LANGUAGE; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

AGILE PRACTICES; ARCHITECTURAL DECISION; ARCHITECTURAL KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENTS (AKM); ARCHITECTURAL SYNTHESIS; CONTROL SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE; ENTERPRISE ARCHITECTS; KNOWLEDGE APPLICATION; PATTERNS;

DECISION MAKING;

EID: 84943245524     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/WICSA.2015.29     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. M. Ali Babar, T. Dingsøyr, P. Lago, H. van Vliet (eds.), Software Architecture Knowledge Management: Theory and Practice, Springer-Verlag, 2009.
2. M. Anvaari, O. Zimmermann, Towards Reusing Architectural Knowledge as Design Guides, Proc. of SEKE 2014, KSI, 2014.
3. C. Fehling, F. Leymann., R. Retter, W. Schupeck, P. Arbitter, Cloud Computing Patterns, Springer 2013.
4. M. Fowler, Patterns of Enterprise Application Architecture. Addison Wesley, 2003.
5. M. Fowler, Richardson Maturity Model, http://martinfowler.com/articles/richardsonMaturityModel.html
6. A. Gaind., Key Architecture Decisions Template, October 2005, Available via http://www.bredemeyer.com
7. P. Hruschka, G. Starke, arc42, Resources for software architects, http://arc42.org/
8. ISO/IEC/IEEE, Systems and software engineering-Architecture description, ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011(E), Dec. 1 2011, http://www.iso-architecture.org/ieee-1471/templates/
9. P. Kruchten, What color is your backlog, via InfoQ blog post, 2010.
10. M. Lindvall, I. Rus, R. Jammalamadaka, and R. Thakker. Software Tools for Knowledge Management: A DACS State-of-the-Art Report. Technical report, Fraunhofer Center for Experimental Software Engineering Maryland and The University of Maryland, 2001.
11. C. Manteuffel, D. Tofan, H. Koziolek, T. Goldschmidt, P. Avgeriou: Industrial Implementation of a Documentation Framework for Architectural Decisions. Proc. Of IEEE/IFIP WICSA 2014, IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2014).
12. A. MacLean, R. Young, V. Bellotti, and T. Moran, Questions, Options, and Criteria: Elements of Design Space Analysis, Human-Computer Interaction, 6 (3&4), 1991.
13. C. Miksovic, O. Zimmermann, Architecturally Significant Requirements, Reference Architecture and Metamodel for Knowledge Management in Information Technology Services. Proc. of IEEE/IFIP WICSA 2011 (2011), IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2011).
14. M. Nygard, Documenting architecture decisions, http://thinkrelevance.com/blog/2011/11/15/documenting-architecturedecisions
15. Open Unified Process (OpenUP), http://epf.eclipse.org/wikis/openup/
16. N. Rozanski, E. Woods, Software Systems Architecture : Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives, Addison Wesley, 2005.
17. M. Shaw, Writing Good Software Engineering Research Papers: Minitutorial. Proceedings of the 25th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, 2003.
18. Sparx Enterprise Architect Version 11 Users Guide, http://www.sparxsystems.com/enterprise-architect-user-guide/11/
19. The official site of the Stage-Gate®, http://www.stage-gate.com/
20. A. Tang, M. Ali Babar, I. Gorton., and J. Han, 2005. A Survey of the Use and Documentation of Architecture Design Rationale. Proc. of the 5th Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture. IEEE Computer Society, 2005.
21. A. Tang, Y. Jin, J. Han: A rationale-based architecture model for design traceability and reasoning. Journal of Systems and Software 80(6): 918-934 (2007).
22. J. Tyree, A. Akerman: Architecture Decisions: Demystifying Architecture. IEEE Software 22(2): 19-27 (2005)
23. R. Weinreich, I. Groher. A Fresh Look at Codification Approaches for SAKM: A Systematic Literature Review. Proc. of ECSA 2014, Springer.
24. U. Zdun, R. Capilla, H. Tran, O. Zimmermann, Sustainable Architectural Design Decisions, IEEE Software, Volume 30, Number 6 (2013).
25. O. Zimmermann, An Architectural Decision Modeling Framework for SOA and Cloud Design, SEI SATURN 2010 Tutorial, page 14. SEI Techncial Library, http://resources.sei.cmu.edu/library/
26. O. Zimmermann, C. Miksovic, Decisions Required vs. Decisions Made: Connecting Enterprise Architects and Solution Architects via Guidance Models, in: I. Mistrík, A. Tang, R. Bahsoon, J. Stafford (eds.), Aligning Enterprise, System, and Software Architectures. IGI Global (2013).
27. O. Zimmermann, U. Zdun, T. Gschwind, F. Leymann, Combining Pattern Languages and Architectural Decision Models into a Comprehensive and Comprehensible Design Method. Proc. of IEEE/IFIP WICSA 2008. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2008).