First vs. second rotation of a poplar short rotation coppice: Leaf area development, light interception and radiation use efficiency

IForest

Volumn 8, Issue OCTOBER2015, 2015, Pages 565-573

  Broeckx, Laura S ^a   Vanbeveren, Stefan P P ^a   Verlinden, Melanie S ^a   Ceulemans, Reinhart ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Aboveground woody biomass productivity; Bioenergy; Genotypic variation; Leaf area index; POPFULL; Populus

Indexed keywords

EID: 84943224318     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19717458     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3832/ifor1457-008     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. AEBIOM (2010). European biomass statistics. European Biomass Association, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 75.
2. Al Afas N, Marron N, Van Dongen S, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R (2008). Dynamics of biomass production in a poplar coppice culture over three rotations (11 years). Forest Ecology and Management 255: 1883-1891.-doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2007.12.010.
3. Benetka V, Novotna K, Stochlova P (2014). Biomass production of Populus nigra L. clones grown in short rotation coppice systems in three different environments over four rotations. iForest 7: 232-238. doi: 10.3832/ifor1162-007.
4. Berhongaray G, El Kasmioui O, Ceulemans R (2013). Comparative analysis of harvesting machines on an operational high-density short rotation woody crop (SRWC) culture: one-process versus two-process harvest operation. Biomass and Bioenergy 58: 333-342.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.07.003.
5. Binkley D, Camargo Campoe O, Gspaltl M, Forrester DI (2013). Light absorption and use efficiency in forests: why patterns differ for trees and stands. Forest Ecology and Management 288: 5-13.-doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2011.11.002.
6. Broeckx LS, Verlinden MS, Ceulemans R (2012). Establishment and two-year growth of a bio-energy plantation with fast-growing Populus trees in Flanders (Belgium): effects of genotype and former land use. Biomass and Bioenergy 42: 151-163.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2012.03.005.
7. Broeckx LS, Verlinden MS, Berhongaray G, Zona D, Fichot R, Ceulemans R (2014a). The effect of a dry spring on seasonal carbon allocation and vegetation dynamics in a poplar bioenergy plantation. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 6: 473-487.-doi: 10.1111/gcbb.12087.
8. Broeckx LS, Fichot R, Verlinden MS, Ceulemans R (2014b). Seasonal variations in photosynthesis, intrinsic water-use efficiency and stable isotope composition of poplar leaves in a short-rotation plantation. Tree Physiology 34: 701-715.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpu057.
9. Bullard MJ, Mustill SJ, Carver P, Nixon PMI (2002). Yield improvements through modification of planting density and harvest frequency in short rotation coppice Salix spp. 2: Resource capture and use in two morphologically diverse varieties. Biomass and Bioenergy 22: 27-39.-doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(01)00055-1.
10. Calfapietra C, Gielen B, Galema ANJ, Lukac M, De Angelis P, Moscatelli MC, Ceulemans R, Scarascia-Mugnozza G (2003). Free-air CO2 enrichment (FACE) enhances biomass production in a short-rotation poplar plantation. Tree Physiology 23: 805-814.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/23. 12.805.
11. Cannell MGR (1989). Light interception, light use efficiency and assimilate partitioning in poplar and willow stands. In: “Biomass Production by Fast-Growing Trees” (Pereira JS, Landsberg JJ eds). Kluwer Academic Publisher, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1-12.-doi: 10.1007/978-94-009-2348-5_1.
12. Cannell MGR, Milne R, Sheppard LJ, Unsworth MH (1987). Radiation interception and productivity of willow. Journal of Applied Ecology 24: 261-278.-doi: 10.2307/2403803.
13. Cannell MGR, Sheppard LJ, Milne R (1988). Light use efficiency and woody biomass production of poplar and willow. Forestry 61: 125-136.-doi: 10.1093/forestry/61.2.125.
14. Casella E, Ceulemans R (2002). Spatial distribution of leaf morphological and physiological characteristics in relation to local radiation regime within the canopies of 3-year-old Populus clones in coppice culture. Tree Physiology 22: 1277-1288.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/22.18.1277.
15. Ceulemans R, Deraedt W (1999). Production physiology and growth potential of poplars under short-rotation forestry culture. Forest Ecology and Management 121: 9-23.-doi: 10.1016/S0378-1127(98)00564-7.
16. Ceulemans R, McDonald AJS, Pereira JS (1996). A comparison among eucalypt, poplar and willow characteristics with particular reference to coppice, growth-modelling approach. Biomass and Bioenergy 11: 215-231.-doi: 10.1016/0961-9534(96)00035-9.
17. Deraedt W, Ceulemans R (1998). Clonal variability in biomass production and conversion efficiency of poplar during the establishment year of a short rotation coppice plantation. Biomass and Bioenergy 15: 391-398.-doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(98)00045-2.
18. Dillen SY, Marron N, Sabatti M, Ceulemans R, Bastien C (2009). Relationships among productivity determinants in two hybrid poplar families grown during three years at two contrasting sites. Tree Physiology 29: 975-987.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/tpp036.
19. Dillen SY, Vanbeveren S, Al Afas N, Laureysens I, Croes S, Ceulemans R (2011). Biomass production in a 15-year-old poplar short-rotation coppice culture in Belgium. Aspects of Applied Biology 112: 99-106. [online] URL: http://www.researchgate.net/profile/Stefan_Vanbeveren/publication/268520412.
20. Dimitriou I, Rosenqvist H, Berndes G (2011). Slow expansion and low yields of willow short rotation coppice in Sweden; implications for future strategies. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 4613-4618.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2011.09.006.
21. Don A, Osborne B, Hastings A, Skiba U, Carter MS, Drewer J, Flessa H, Freibauer A, Hyvönen N, Jones MB, Lanigan GJ, Mander U, Monti A, Njakou Djomo S, Valentine J, Walter K, Zegada-Lizarazu W, Zenone T (2011). Land-use change to bioenergy production in Europe: implications for the greenhouse gas balance and soil carbon. Global Change Biology Bioenergy 4: 372-391.-doi: 10.1111/j.1757-1707.2011.01116.x
22. Dowell RC, Gibbins D, Rhoads JL, Pallardy SG (2009). Biomass production physiology and soil carbon dynamics in short-rotation-grown Populus deltoides and P. deltoides × P. nigra hybrids. Forest Ecology and Management 257: 134-142.-doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2008.08.023.
23. European Council (2009). On the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources and amending and subsequently repealing Directives 2001/77/EC and 2003/30/EC. Directive 2009/28/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23. April 2009, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 47.
24. Fischer G, Prieler S, Van Velthuizen H, Berndes G, Faaij A, Londo M, De Wit M (2010). Biofuel production potentials in Europe: sustainable use of cultivated land and pastures, Part II: land use scenarios. Biomass and Bioenergy 34: 173-187.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.07.009.
25. Fischer M, Trnka M, Kucera J, Deckmyn G, Orság M, Sedlák P, Zalud Z, Ceulemans R (2013). Evapotranspiration of a high-density poplar stand in comparison with a reference grass cover in the Czech-Moravian highlands. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 181: 43-60.-doi: 10.1016/j.agrformet.2013.07.004.
26. Green DS, Kruger EL, Stanosz GR, Isebrands JG (2001). Light-use efficiency of native and hybrid poplar genotypes at high levels of intracanopy competition. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 31: 1030-1037.-doi: 10.1139/x01-041.
27. Guidi W, Piccioni E, Bonari E (2008). Evapotranspiration and crop coefficient of poplar and willow short-rotation coppice used as vegetation filter. Bioresource Technology 99: 4832-4840.-doi: 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.055.
28. Heilman PE, Hinckley TM, Roberts DA, Ceulemans R (1996). Production physiology. In: “Biology of Populus and its Implications for Management and Conservation” (Stettler RF, Bradshaw HD, Heilman PE, Hinckley TM eds). NRC Research Press, Ottawa, ON, Canada, pp. 459-489. [online] URL: http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/9780660165066.
29. Howe GT, Saruul P, Davis J, Chen THH (2000). Quantitative genetics of bud phenology, frost damage, and winter survival in an F2 family of hybrid poplars. Theoretical and Applied Genetics 101: 632-642.-doi: 10.1007/s001220051525.
30. IPCC (2014). Climate change 2014: mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working Group III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (Edenhofer O, Pichs-Madruga R, Sokona Y, Farahani E, Kadner S, Seyboth K, Adler A, Baum I, Brunner S, Eickemeier P, Krieman B, Savolainen J, Schlömer S, Stechow C, Zwickel T, Minx Ceds J eds). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA, pp. 1075.
31. Isebrands JG, Nelson NO, Dickmann DI, Michael DA (1983). Yield physiology of short rotation intensively cultured poplars. Technical Report GTR-NC-91, USDA Forest Service, St. Paul, MN, USA, pp. 77-93.
32. Langeveld H, Quist-Wessel F, Dimitriou I, Aronsson P, Baum C, Schulz U, Bolte A, Baum S, Köhn J, Weih M, Gruss H, Leinweber P, Lamersdorf N, Schmidt-Walter P, Berndes G (2012). Assessing environmental impacts of short rotation coppice (SRC) expansion: model definition and preliminary results. Bioenergy Research 5: 621-635.-doi: 10.1007/s12155-012-9235-x
33. Larcher W (2003). Physiological plant physiology (4th edn). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, New York, pp. 513.
34. Larson PR, Isebrands JG (1972). The relation between leaf production and wood weight in firstyear root sprouts of two Populus clones. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 2: 98-104.-doi: 10.1139/x72-020.
35. Liberloo M, Calfapietra C, Lukac M, Godbold D, Luos ZB, Polle A, Hoosbeek MR, Kull O, Marek M, Raines C, Rubino M, Taylor G, Scarascia-Mugnozza G, Ceulemans R (2006). Woody biomass production during the second rotation of a bio-energy Populus plantation increases in a future high CO2 world. Global Change Biology 12: 1094-1106.-doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2486.2006.01 118.x
36. Liberloo M, Dillen SY, Calfapietra C, Marinari S, Luo ZB, De Angelis P, Ceulemans R (2005). Elevated CO2 concentration, fertilization and their interaction: growth stimulation in a shortrotation poplar coppice (EUROFACE). Tree Physiology 25: 179-189.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/25.2.179.
37. Linderson ML, Iritz Z, Lindroth A (2007). The effect of water availability on standlevel productivity, transpiration, water use efficiency and radiation use efficiency of field-grown willow clones. Biomass and Bioenergy 31: 460-468.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe.2007.01.014.
38. Lindroth A, Verwijst T, Halldin S (1994). Wateruse efficiency of willow: variation with season, humidity and biomass allocation. Journal of Hydrology 156: 1-19.-doi: 10.1016/0022-1694(94) 90068-X
39. Medlyn BE (1998). Physiological basis of the light use efficiency model. Tree Physiology 18: 167-176.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/18.3.167.
40. Michael DA, Isebrands JG, Dickmann DI, Nelson ND (1988). Growth and development during the establishment year of two Populus clones with contrasting morphology and phenology. Tree Physiology 4: 139-152.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/4.2.139.
41. Paris P, Mareschi L, Sabatti M, Pisanelli A, Ecosse A, Nardin F, Scarascia-Mugnozza GE (2011). Comparing hybrid Populus clones for SFR across northern Italy after two biennial rotations: survival, growth and yield. Biomass and Bioenergy 35: 1524-1532.-doi: 10.1016/j.biombioe. 2010.12.050.
42. Pellis A, Laureysens I, Ceulemans R (2004). Genetic variation of the bud and leaf phenology of seventeen poplar clones in a short rotation coppice culture. Plant Biology 6: 38-46.-doi: 10.1055/s-2003-44746.
43. Petzold R, Schwärzel K, Feger KH (2010). Transpiration of a hybrid poplar plantation in Saxony (Germany) in response to climate and soil conditions. European Journal of Forest Research 130: 695-706.-doi: 10.1007/s10342-010-0459-z
44. Proe MF, Griffiths JH, Craig J (2002). Effects of spacing, species and coppicing on leaf area, light interception and photosynthesis in short rotation forestry. Biomass and Bioenergy 23: 315-326.-doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(02)00060-0.
45. Rae AM, Robinson KM, Street NR, Taylor G (2004). Morphological and physiological traits influencing biomass productivity in short-rotation coppice poplar. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 34: 1488-1498.-doi: 10.1139/x04-033.
46. Rosenqvist H, Roos A, Ling E, Hektor B (2000). Willow growers in Sweden. Biomass and Bioenergy 18: 137-145.-doi: 10.1016/S0961-9534(99)00081-1.
47. Ruimy A, Dedieu G, Saugier B (1994). Methodology for the estimation of terrestrial net primary production from remotely sensed data. Journal of Geophysical Research-Atmospheres 99: 5263-5283.-doi: 10.1029/93JD03221.
48. Scarascia-Mugnozza GE, Isebrands JG, Hinckley TM, Stettler RF (1989). Dynamics of light interception, leaf area and biomass production in Populus clones in the establishment year. Annals of Forest Science 49: 515-518.-doi: 10.1051/forest:198905ART0116.
49. Serup H, Kofman PD, Falster H, Gamborg C, Gundersen P, Hansen L, Heding N, Houmann H, Nikolaisen L, Thomsen IM, Carroll J (2005). Wood for energy production, Irish edition. COFORD, National Council for Forest Research and Development, Dublin, Ireland, pp. 72. [online] URL: https://inis.iaea.org/search/search.aspx?orig_q=RN:31004157.
50. Sinclair TR, Horie T (1989). Leaf nitrogen, photosynthesis and crop radiation use efficiency: a review. Crop Science 29: 90-98.-doi: 10.2135/cropsci1989.0011183X002900010023x
51. Taylor G, Ceulemans R, Ferris R, Gardner SDL, Shao BY (2001a). Increased leaf area expansion of hybrid poplar in elevated CO2. From controlled environments to open-top chambers and to FACE. Environmental Pollution 115: 463-472.-doi: 10.1016/S0269-7491(01)00235-4.
52. Tharakan PJ, Volk TA, Nowak CA, Ofezu GJ (2008). Assessment of canopy structure, light interception, and light-use efficiency of first year regrowth of shrub willow (Salix sp.). Bioenergy Research 1: 229-238.-doi: 10.1007/s12155-008-9023-9.
53. Tschaplinski TJ, Blake TJ (1989). Water relations, photosynthetic capacity and root/shoot partitioning of photosynthate as determinants of productivity in hybrid poplar cultivars. Canadian Journal of Botany 67: 1689-1697.-doi: 10.1139/b8 9-213.
54. Turok J, Lefèvre F, Cagelli L, Vries SD (1996). Populus nigra network. Report of the second meeting, Casale Monferrato (Italy) 10-12. Sep 1995. International Plant Genetic Resources Institute, Rome, Italy, pp. 26.
55. Verlinden MS, Broeckx LS, Van den Bulcke J, Van Acker J, Ceulemans R (2013). Comparative study of biomass determinants of 12 poplar (Populus) genotypes in a high-density short-rotation culture. Forest Ecology and Management 307: 101-111.-doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2013.06.062.
56. Xu L, Baldocchi DD (2003). Seasonal trends in photosynthetic parameters and stomatal conductance of blue oak (Quercus douglasii) under prolonged summer drought and high temperature. Tree Physiology 23: 865-877.-doi: 10.1093/treephys/23.13.865