Protocol for a systematic review of the impact of resuscitation fluids on the microcirculation after haemorrhagic shock in animal models

Systematic Reviews

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2015, Pages

  Naumann, David N ^a   Dretzke, Janine ^a,b   Hutchings, Sam ^c   Midwinter, Mark J ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^c KING'S COLLEGE HOSPITAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Haemorrhagic shock; Microcirculation; Resuscitation

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BLOOD COMPONENT THERAPY; CRYSTALLOID; DISEASE MODEL; ERYTHROCYTE CONCENTRATE; FLUID RESUSCITATION; HEMORRHAGIC SHOCK; METHODOLOGY; MICROANGIOPATHY; MICROCIRCULATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ANIMAL; ANIMAL MODEL; FLUID THERAPY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RESUSCITATION; SHOCK, HEMORRHAGIC;

ANIMALS; FLUID THERAPY; MICROCIRCULATION; MODELS, ANIMAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESUSCITATION; SHOCK, HEMORRHAGIC;

EID: 84943180532     PISSN: None     EISSN: 20464053     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13643-015-0113-4     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Trzeciak S, Dellinger RP, Parrillo JE, Guglielmi M, Bajaj J, Abate NL, et al. Early microcirculatory perfusion derangements in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock: relationship to hemodynamics, oxygen transport, and survival. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49(1):88-98. e1-2.
2. Tachon G, Harrois A, Tanaka S, Kato H, Huet O, Pottecher J, et al. Microcirculatory alterations in traumatic hemorrhagic shock. Crit Care Med. 2014;42(6):1433-41.
3. Trzeciak S, McCoy JV, Phillip Dellinger R, Arnold RC, Rizzuto M, Abate NL, et al. Early increases in microcirculatory perfusion during protocol-directed resuscitation are associated with reduced multi-organ failure at 24 h in patients with sepsis. Intensive Care Med. 2008;34(12):2210-7.
4. Jhanji S, Vivian-Smith A, Lucena-Amaro S, Watson D, Hinds CJ, Pearse RM. Haemodynamic optimisation improves tissue microvascular flow and oxygenation after major surgery: a randomised controlled trial. Crit Care. 2010;14(4):R151.
5. de Vries RBM, Hooijmans CR, Langendam MW, van Luijk J, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga, et al. A protocol format for the preparation, registration and publication of systematic reviews of animal intervention studies. Evid-Based Preclinical Med. 2015;2(1):1-9
6. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from www.cochrane-handbook.org.
7. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Int J Surg. 2010;8(5):336-41.
8. Sena ES, Currie GL, McCann SK, Macleod MR, Howells DW. Systematic reviews and meta-analysis of preclinical studies: why perform them and how to appraise them critically. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2014;34(5):737-42.
9. Hooijmans CR, Rovers MM, de Vries RB, Leenaars M, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, Langendam MW. SYRCLE's risk of bias tool for animal studies. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2014;14:43.
10. Moga C, Guo B, Schopflocher D, Harstall C. Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified Delphi technique. Institute of Health Economics: Edmonton AB; 2012.
11. Henderson VC, Kimmelman J, Fergusson D, Grimshaw JM, Hackam DG. Threats to validity in the design and conduct of preclinical efficacy studies: a systematic review of guidelines for in vivo animal experiments. PLoS Med. 2013;10(7), e1001489.
12. Vesterinen HM, Sena ES, Egan KJ, Hirst TC, Churolov L, Currie GL, et al. Meta-analysis of data from animal studies: a practical guide. J Neurosci Methods. 2014;221:92-102.
13. Caldwell DM, Ades AE, Higgins JP. Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ. 2005;331(7521):897-900.
14. Briel M, Muller KF, Meerpohl JJ, von Elm E, Lang B, Motschall E, et al. Publication bias in animal research: a systematic review protocol. Syst Rev. 2013;2:23.
15. Sena ES, van der Worp HB, Bath PM, Howells DW, Macleod MR. Publication bias in reports of animal stroke studies leads to major overstatement of efficacy. PLoS Biol. 2010;8(3), e1000344.
16. Peters JL, Sutton AJ, Jones DR, Abrams KR, Rushton L. Comparison of two methods to detect publication bias in meta-analysis. JAMA. 2006;295(6):676-80.
17. Burkhardt M, Kristen A, Culemann U, Koehler D, Histing T, Holstein JH, et al. TraumaRegister DGU; German pelvic injury register. Pelvic fracture in multiple trauma: are we still up-to-date with massive fluid resuscitation? Injury. 2014;45 Suppl 3:S70-5.
18. Kanoore Edul VS, Ince C, Dubin A. What is microcirculatory shock? Curr Opin Crit Care. 2015;21(3):245-52.