Tailoring privacy to users’ needs

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2109, Issue , 2001, Pages 303-313

  Kobsa, Alfred ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTERS;

PRIVACY CONCERNS; PRIVACY LAW; PRIVACY LEGISLATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 84943145987     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (51)

1. Corbett, A., McLaughlin, M., and Scarpinatto, K. C.: Modeling Student Knowledge: Cognitive Tutors in High School and College. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 (2000) 81-108.
2. Strachan, L., Anderson, J., Sneesby, M., and Evans, M.: Minimalist User Modelling in a Complex Commercial Software System. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 (2000) 109-146.
3. Linton, F. and Schaefer, H.-P.: Recommender Systems for Learning: Building User and Expert Models through Long-Term Observation of Application Use. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 (2000) 181-208.
4. Billsus, D. and Pazzani, M. J.: User Modeling for Adaptive News Access. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction 10 (2000) 147-180.
5. Kobsa, A.: Adapting Web Information to Disabled and Elderly Users (invited paper). WebNet-99, Honolulu, HI, (1999).
6. Shapira, B., Shoval, P., and Hanani, U.: Information Filtering: Overview of Issues, Research and Systems. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction (forthcoming).
7. Kobsa, A., Koenemann, J., and Pohl, W.: Personalized Hypermedia Presentation Techniques for Improving Customer Relationships. The Knowledge Engineering Review (forthcoming), http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kobsa/papers/2001-KER-kobsa.pdf
8. Peppers, D. and Rogers, M.: The One to One Future: Building Relationships One Customer at a Time. New York, N.Y.: Currency Doubleday, (1993).
9. Peppers, D. and Rogers, M.: Enterprise One to One: Tools for Competing in the Interactive Age. New York, N.Y.: Currency Doubleday, (1997).
10. The Privacy Best Practise. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA (1999).
11. Hof, R., Green, H., and Himmelstein, L.: Now it's YOUR WEB. Business Week, October 5, (1998) 68-75.
12. Thompson, M.: Registered Visitors Are a Portal’s Best Friend. The Industry Standard, June 7, 1999, http://www.thestandard.net
13. Personalization & Privacy Survey. Personalization Consortium, Edgewater Place, MA (2000), http://www.personalization.org/SurveyResults.pdf
14. Bachem, C.: Profilgestütztes Online Marketing. Personalisierung im E-Commerce, Hamburg, Germany, (1999).
15. Cooperstein, D., Delhagen, K., Aber, A., and Levin, K.: Making Net Shoppers Loyal. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA June 1999.
16. Hagen, P. R., Manning, H., and Souza, R.: Smart Personalization. Forrester Research, Cambridge, MA (1999).
17. Schafer, J. B., Konstan, J., and Riedl, J.: Recommender Systems in E-Commerce. ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC99), Denver, CO, (1999) 158-166.
18. More Concentrated than the Leading Brand. ICONOCAST, 1999, http://www.iconocast.com/icono-archive/icono.102199.html
19. Reichheld, F.: The Loyalty Effect. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press (1996).
20. Peppers, D., Rogers, M., and Dorf, B.: The One to One Fieldbook. New York, NY: Currency Doubleday (1999).
21. Appian Web Personalization Report. Appian, 2000, http://www.appiancorp.com/ awpr.asp
22. Abrams, C., Bernstein, M., deSisto, R., Drobik, A., and Herschel, G.: E-Business: The Business Tsunami. Gartner Group Symposium/ITxpo, Cannes, France (1999).
23. DePallo, M.: AARP National Survey on Consumer Preparedness and E-Commerce: A Survey of Computer Users Age 45 and Older. AARP, Washington, D.C. March 2000.
24. Fox, S., Rainie, L., Horrigan, J., Lenhart, A., Spooner, T., and Carter, C.: Trust and Privacy Online: Why Americans Want to Rewrite the Rules. The Pew Internet & American Life Project, Washington, DC (2000).
25. eTRUST Internet Privacy Study: Summary of Market Survey Results. Boston Consulting Group, 1997.
26. GVU's 10th WWW User Survey. Graphics, Visualization and Usability Lab, Georgia Tech, 1998, http://www.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-10/
27. Privacy Online: Fair Information Practices in the Electronic Marketplace. A Report to Congress. Federal Trade Commission, Washington, D.C. May 2000, http://www.ftc.gov/ reports/privacy2000/privacy2000.pdf.
28. IBM Multi-National Consumer Privacy Survey. IBM Oct. 1999. http://www.ibm.com/ services/files/privacy_survey_oct991.pdf
29. Self-Regulatory Principles for Online Preference Marketing by Network Advisers. Network Advertising Initiative, 2000, http://www.ftc.gov/os/2000/07/NAI7-10Final.pdf
30. U.S. Lawmakers Examine Pros, Cons of Privacy Law. SiliconValley.com, 1 March 2001, http://www.siliconvalley.com/docs/news/tech/039799.htm
31. Recommendation of the Council Concerning Guidelines Governing the Protection of Privacy and Transborder Flows of Personal Data., OECD, 1980, http://www.oecd.org//dsti/sti/ it/secur/prod/PRIV-EN.HTM
32. Directive 95/46/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 October 1995 on the Protection of Individuals with Regard to the Processing of Personal Data and on the Free Movement of such Data. Official Journal of the European Communities (1995), p. 31. http://158.169.50.95:10080/legal/en/dataprot/directiv/directiv.html
33. Argentinia Personal Data Protection Act., 2000,http://www.privacyinternational. org/countries/argentina/argentine-dpa.html
34. Hong Kong Personal Data (Privacy) Ordinance, 1995, http://www.privacy.com.hk/ contents.html
35. Hungary Act LXIII of 1992 on the Protection of Personal Data and the Puclicity of Data of Public Interest., 1992, http://www.privacy.org/pi/countries/hungary/hungary_ privacy_law_1992.html
36. Taiwan Computer-Processed Personal Data Protection Law., 1995, http://virtualtaiwan.com/members/guide/legal/cpdpl.htm
37. New Zealand Privacy Act., 1993, http://www.knowledge-basket.co.nz/privacy/recept/ rectop.html
38. Australian Privacy Act., 2000 http://www.privacy.gov.au/publications/privacy88.pdf
39. NYT: Welcome to the Web. Passport, Please? New York Times, March 15, 2001.
40. GeoPoint., 2001, http://www.quova.com/service.htm
41. GeoGrid., 2001, http://www.ingeodesy.com/
42. Reagle, J. and Cranor, L.: The Platform for Privacy Preferences. Communications of the ACM 42 (1999) 48-55.
43. The Platform for Privacy Preferences 1.0 (P3P1.0) Specification., 2000, http://www.w3.org/TR/2000/WD-P3P-20001018/
44. Microsoft Announces Privacy Enhancements for Windows, Internet Explorer. Microsoft Corporation, 2000, http://www.microsoft.com/PressPass/press/2000/ jun00/p3ppr.asp
45. German Teleservices Data Protection Act., 1997, http://www.datenschutz-berlin.de/ recht/de/rv/tk_med/iukdg_en.htm#a2
46. The Seven Safe Harbor Principles. Federal Trade Commission, 2000, http://europa.eu.int/ comm/internal_market/en/media/dataprot/news/shprinciples.pdf
47. Schreck, J.: Security and Privacy in User Models. Dept. of Mathematics and Computer Science, Univ. of Essen, Germany (2000) http://www.ics.uci.edu/~kobsa/phds/schreck.pdf
48. Grimm, R. and Rossnagel, A.: Can P3P Help to Protect Privacy Worldwide? ACM Multimedia 2000 Workshops, Los Angeles, CA (2000) 157-160.
49. Pretty Poor Privacy: An Assessment of P3P and Internet Privacy. Electronic Privacy Information Center and Junkbusters (2000), http://www.epic.org/reports/prettypoorprivacy.html
50. Kobsa, A.: User Modeling in Dialog Systems: Potentials and Hazards. AI and Society 4 (1990) 214-240.
51. Herrmann, T.: Benutzermodellierung und Datenschutz (User Modeling and Data Protection). Datenschutz und Datensicherheit 14 (1990) 352-359