Short-term quality of life in patients undergoing colonic surgery using enhanced recovery after surgery program versus conventional perioperative management

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 24, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 2663-2670

  Wang, Hao ^a   Zhu, Dexiang ^a   Liang, Li ^a   Ye, Lechi ^a   Lin, Qi ^a   Zhong, Yunshi ^a   Wei, Ye ^a   Ren, Li ^a   Xu, Jianmin ^a   Qin, Xinyu ^a  

^a FUDAN UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Colonic surgery; Enhanced recovery after surgery; Quality of life

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; COGNITION; COLON SURGERY; CONSTIPATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFECATION DISORDER; DIARRHEA; ENHANCED RECOVERY AFTER SURGERY PROGRAM; FEMALE; FINANCIAL DEFICIT; GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASE; HEALTH PROGRAM; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LOSS OF APPETITE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE C30; QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE CR29; SOCIAL INTERACTION; COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; MIDDLE AGED; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; QUESTIONNAIRE; REHABILITATION;

COLONIC NEOPLASMS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; QUALITY OF LIFE; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 84942983077     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-015-0996-5     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Basse, L., Hjort Jakobsen, D., Billesbølle, P., et al. (2000). A clinical pathway to accelerate recovery after colonic resection. Annals of Surgery,232, 51–57.
2. Kehlet, H., & Wilmore, D. W. (2002). Multimodal strategies to improve surgical outcome. American Journal of Surgery,183, 630–641.
3. Fearon, K. C., Ljungqvist, O., Von Meyenfeldt, M., et al. (2005). Enhanced recovery after surgery: A consensus review of clinical care for patients undergoing colonic resection. Clinical Nutrition,24, 466–477.
4. Lassen, K., Soop, M., Nygren, J., et al. (2009). Consensus review of optimal perioperative care in colorectal surgery: Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) GROUP recommendations. Archives of Surgery,144, 961–969.
5. Wind, J., Polle, S. W., Fung Kon Jin, P. H., et al. (2006). Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. British Journal of Surgery,93, 800–809.
6. Spanjersberg, W. R., Reurings, J., Keus, F., et al. (2011). Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Systematic Review,2, CD007635.
7. Vlug, M. S., Wind, J., Hollmann, M. W., et al. (2011). Laparoscopy in combination with fast track multimodal management is the best perioperative strategy in patients undergoing colonic surgery: A randomized clinical trial (LAFA-study). Annals of Surgery,254, 868–875.
8. Zhuang, C. L., Ye, X. Z., Zhang, X. D., et al. (2013). Enhanced recovery after surgery programs versus traditional care for colorectal surgery: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum,56, 667–678.
9. Koller, M., & Lorenz, W. (2003). Survival of the quality of life concept. British Journal of Surgery,90, 1175–1177.
10. Langenhoff, B. S., Krabbe, P. F., Wobbes, T., et al. (2001). Quality of life as an outcome measure in surgical oncology. British Journal of Surgery,88, 643–652.
11. Otto, S., Kroesen, A. J., Hotz, H. G., et al. (2008). Effect of anastomosis level on continence performance and quality of life after colonic J-pouch reconstruction. Digestive Diseases and Sciences,53, 14–20.
12. Sailer, M., Fuchs, K. H., Fein, M., & Thiede, A. (2002). Randomized clinical trial comparing quality of life after straight and pouch coloanal reconstruction. British Journal of Surgery,89, 1108–1117.
13. Kasparek, M. S., Hassan, I., Cima, R. R., et al. (2011). Quality of life after coloanal anastomosis and abdominoperineal resection for distal rectal cancers: Sphincter preservation vs quality of life. Colorectal Disease,13, 872–877.
14. Khan, S., Wilson, T., Ahmed, J., et al. (2010). Quality of life and patient satisfaction with enhanced recovery protocols. Colorectal Disease,12, 1175–1182.
15. Ren, L., Zhu, D., Wei, Y., et al. (2012). Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) program attenuates stress and accelerates recovery in patients after radical resection for colorectal cancer: A prospective randomized controlled trial. World Journal of Surgery,36, 407–414.
16. Fayers, P. M., Aaronson, N. K., Bjordal, K., et al. (2001). The EORTC QLQ-C30 scoring manual (3rd edition). Brussels: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer.
17. Whistance, R. N., Conroy, T., Chie, W., et al. (2009). Clinical and psychometric validation of the EORTC QLQ-CR29 questionnaire module to Assess health-related quality of life in patients with colorectal cancer. European Journal of Cancer,45, 3017–3026.
18. Osoba, D., Rodrigues, G., Myles, J., et al. (1998). Interpreting the significance of changes in health-related quality-of-life scores. Journal of Clinical Oncology,16, 139–144.
19. Gatt, M., Anderson, A. D., Reddy, B. S., et al. (2005). Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization of surgical care in patients undergoing major colonic resection. British Journal of Surgery,92, 1354–1362.
20. Anderson, A. D. G., McNaught, C. E., MacFie, J., et al. (2003). Randomized clinical trial of multimodal optimization and standard perioperative surgical care. British Journal of Surgery,90, 1497–1504.
21. Basse, L., Raskov, H. H., Hjort Jakobsen, D., et al. (2002). Accelerated postoperative recovery programme after colonic resection improves physical performance, pulmonary function and body composition. British Journal of Surgery,89, 446–453.
22. Raue, W., Haase, O., Junghans, T., et al. (2004). ‘Fast-track’ multimodal rehabilitation program improves outcome after laparoscopic sigmoidectomy: A controlled prospective evaluation. Surgical Endoscopy,18, 1463–1468.
23. Jakobsen, D. H., Sonne, E., Andreasen, J., et al. (2006). Convalescence after colonic surgery with fast-track vs conventional care. Colorectal Disease,8, 683–687.
24. Zargar-Shoshtari, K., Paddison, J. S., Booth, R. J., et al. (2009). A prospective study on the influence of a fast-track program on postoperative fatigue and functional recovery after major colonic surgery. Journal of Surgical Research,154, 330–335.
25. Delaney, C. P., Zutshi, M., Senagore, A. J., et al. (2003). Prospective, randomized, controlled trial between a pathway of controlled rehabilitation with early ambulation and diet and traditional postoperative care after laparotomy and intestinal resection. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum,46, 851–859.
26. Henriksen, M. G., Jensen, M. B., Hansen, H. V., et al. (2002). Enforced mobilization, early oral feeding, and balanced analgesia improve convalescence after colorectal surgery. Nutrition,18, 147–152.
27. King, P. M., Blazeby, J. M., Ewings, P., et al. (2006). The influence of an enhanced recovery programme on clinical outcomes, costs and quality of life after surgery for colorectal cancer. Colorectal Disease,8, 506–513.
28. Khan, S. A., Ullah, S., Ahmed, J., et al. (2013). Influence of enhanced recovery after surgery pathways and laparoscopic surgery on health-related quality of life. Colorectal Disease,15, 900–907.
29. Osoba, D., Hsu, M. A., Copley-Merriman, C., et al. (2006). Stated preferences of patients with cancer for health-related quality-of-life (HRQOL) domains during treatment. Quality of Life Research,15, 273–283.
30. Cocks, K., King, M. T., Velikova, G., et al. (2012). Evidence-based guidelines for interpreting change scores for the European organisation for the research and treatment of cancer quality of life questionnaire core 30. European Journal of Cancer,48, 1713–1721.