Video-based Peer Feedback Through Social Networking for Robotic Surgery Simulation: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial

Annals of Surgery

Volumn 261, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 870-875

  Carter, Stacey C ^a   Chiang, Alexander ^b   Shah, Galaxy ^c   Kwan, Lorna ^a   Montgomery, Jeffrey S ^c   Karam, Amer ^d   Tarnay, Christopher ^b   Guru, Khurshid A ^a   Hu, Jim C ^a  

^a ROSWELL PARK CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^d Roswell Park Cancer Institute ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

learning curve, randomized control trial, robotic surgery, simulation; surgical education

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MULTICENTER STUDY; OPERATION DURATION; PEER FEEDBACK; PEER GROUP; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RESIDENT; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SATISFACTION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SIMULATOR; SOCIAL NETWORK; VIDEORECORDING; WEB BROWSER; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; EDUCATION; GENERAL SURGERY; LEARNING CURVE; MEDICAL EDUCATION; ROBOTICS;

CLINICAL COMPETENCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEEDBACK; GENERAL SURGERY; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LEARNING CURVE; PEER GROUP; ROBOTICS; SOCIAL NETWORKING; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 84942981763     PISSN: 00034932     EISSN: 15281140     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000756     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kerr B, O'Leary JP,. The training of the surgeon: Dr. Halsted's greatest legacy. Am Surg. 1999; 65: 1101-1102.
2. Reznick RK,. Teaching and testing technical skills. Am J Surg. 1993; 165: 358-361.
3. Lee JY, Mucksavage P, Sundaram CP, Best practices for robotic surgery training and credentialing. J Urol. 2011; 185: 1191-1197.
4. Roberts KE, Bell RL, Duffy AJ,. Evolution of surgical skills training. World J Gastroenterol. 2006; 12: 3219-3224.
5. Zorn KC, Gautam G, Shalhav AL, Training, credentialing, proctoring and medicolegal risks of robotic urological surgery: recommendations of the society of urologic robotic surgeons. J Urol. 2009; 182: 1126-1132.
6. Hu YY, Peyre SE, Arriaga AF, Postgame analysis: using video-based coaching for continuous professional development. J Am Coll Surg. 2012; 214: 115-124.
7. Birkmeyer JD, Finks JF, O'Reilly A, Surgical skill and complication rates after bariatric surgery. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369: 1434-1442.
8. Hamad GG, Brown MT, Clavijo-Alvarez JA,. Postoperative video debriefing reduces technical errors in laparoscopic surgery. Am J Surg. 2007; 194: 110-114.
9. Farrell AM, Mayer SH, Rethlefsen ML,. Teaching Web 2.0 beyond the library: adventures in social media, the class. Med Ref Serv Q. 2011; 30: 233-244.
10. Turner PL,. Social networking in surgery: the residency program director's view. Surgery. 2011; 150: 7-9.
11. Tilt A, Mermel C, Conrad C,. How surgical residents use social media. Surgery. 2011; 150: 5-6.
12. Hung AJ, Patil MB, Zehnder P, Concurrent and predictive validation of a novel robotic surgery simulator: a prospective, randomized study. J Urol. 2012; 187: 630-637.
13. Sturm LP, Windsor JA, Cosman PH, A systematic review of skills transfer after surgical simulation training. Ann Surg. 2008; 248: 166-179.
14. Goh AC, Goldfarb DW, Sander JC, Global evaluative assessment of robotic skills: validation of a clinical assessment tool to measure robotic surgical skills. J Urol. 2012; 187: 247-252.
15. Walsh PC, Marschke P, Ricker D, Use of intraoperative video documentation to improve sexual function after radical retropubic prostatectomy. Urology. 2000; 55: 62-67.
16. Langreth R,. Intuitive robosurgery training seen lacking in lawsuits. Bloomberg. 2013. Available at: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-21/intuitive-robosurgery-training-seen-lacking-in-lawsuits.html. Accessed June 2013.
17. Vickers AJ, Sjoberg D, Basch E, How do you know if you are any good? A surgeon performance feedback system for the outcomes of radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol. 2012; 61: 284-289.
18. Vickers A, Savage C, Bianco F, Cancer control and functional outcomes after radical prostatectomy as markers of surgical quality: analysis of heterogeneity between surgeons at a single cancer center. Eur Urol. 2011; 59: 317-322.
19. Tasian GF, Wiebe DJ, Casale P,. Learning curve of robotic assisted pyeloplasty for pediatric urology fellows. J Urol. 2013; 190: 1622-1626.
20. Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, The learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol. 2011; 25: 1633-1637.
21. Carter SC, Lipsitz S, Shih YC, Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy operative time. BJU Int. 2013; 113: E112-E118.