Population-based determinants of radical prostatectomy operative time

BJU International

Volumn 113, Issue 5 B, 2014, Pages

  Carter, Stacey C ^a   Lipsitz, Stuart ^b   Shih, Ya Chen T ^c   Nguyen, Paul L ^b   Trinh, Quoc Dien ^b,d   Hu, Jim C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^d HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Operative time; Prostate cancer; Prostatectomy; Retropubic radical prostatectomy; Robot assisted radical prostatectomy

Indexed keywords

AGED; ANESTHESIA INDUCTION; ARTICLE; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; COHORT ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; STANDARD;

OPERATIVE TIME; PROSTATE CANCER; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROPUBIC RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY; ROBOT-ASSISTED RADICAL PROSTATECTOMY;

AGED; COHORT STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; OPERATIVE TIME; PROSTATECTOMY;

EID: 84902352177     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.12451     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Schuessler WW, Schulam PG, Clayman RV, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: initial short-term experience. Urology 1997; 50: 854-7 (Pubitemid 28021100)
2. Guillonneau B, Vallancien G. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: the Montsouris technique. J Urol 2000; 163: 1643-9 (Pubitemid 30366705)
3. Gumus E, Boylu U, Turan T, Onol FF. The learning curve of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. J Endourol 2011; 25: 1633-7
4. Scales CD Jr, Jones PJ, Eisenstein EL, Preminger GM, Albala DM. Local cost structures and the economics of robot assisted radical prostatectomy. J Urol 2005; 174: 2323-9 (Pubitemid 41611814)
5. Gillespie BM, Chaboyer W, Fairweather N. Factors that influence the expected length of operation: results of a prospective study. BMJ Qual Saf 2012; 21: 3-12
6. Macario A. What does one minute of operating room time cost? J Clin Anesth 2010; 22: 233-6
7. Campbell DA Jr, Henderson WG, Englesbe MJ et al. Surgical site infection prevention: the importance of operative duration and blood transfusion - results of the first American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Best Practices Initiative. J Am Coll Surg 2008; 207: 810-20
8. Mills JT, Burris MB, Warburton DJ, Conaway MR, Schenkman NS, Krupski TL. Positioning injuries associated with robotic-assisted urologic surgery. J Urol 2013; 190: 580-4
9. Silber JH, Rosenbaum PR, Even-Shoshan O et al. Estimating anesthesia time using the medicare claim: a validation study. Anesthesiology 2011; 115: 322-33
10. Potosky AL, Riley GF, Lubitz JD, Mentnech RM, Kessler LG. Potential for cancer related health services research using a linked Medicare-tumor registry database. Med Care 1993; 31: 732-48
11. Lowrance WT, Elkin EB, Jacks LM et al. Comparative effectiveness of prostate cancer surgical treatments: a population based analysis of postoperative outcomes. J Urol 2010; 183: 1366-72
12. Klabunde CN, Potosky AL, Legler JM, Warren JL. Development of a comorbidity index using physician claims data. J Clin Epidemiol 2000; 53: 1258-67 (Pubitemid 32007842)
13. National Cancer Institute. Surveillance E, and End Results (SEER) limited-use data set. Available at: http://seer.cancer.gov. Accessed January 2012
14. Bechis SK, Carroll PR, Cooperberg MR. Impact of age at diagnosis on prostate cancer treatment and survival. J Clin Oncol 2011; 29: 235-41
15. Natarajan LS, Fitzmaurie GM, Sinha D et al. An extension of the Wilcoxon rank wum test for complex sample survey data. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 2012; 61: 653-64
16. Lipsitz FG, Molenberghs G, Zhao LP. Quantile regression methods for longitudinal data with drop-out: application to CD4 cell counts of patients infected with the human immunodeficiency virus. J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat 1997; 46: 463-76
17. Kowalczyk KJ, Levy JM, Caplan CF et al. Temporal national trends of minimally invasive and retropubic radical prostatectomy outcomes from 2003 to 2007: results from the 100% Medicare sample. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 803-9
18. Novara G, Ficarra V, Rosen RC et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of perioperative outcomes and complications after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 431-52
19. Hu JC, Wood D, Andriole G et al. Perioperative Quality of Care Indicators of Retropubic laparoscopic and Robotic Prostatectomy: results from a National, Multicenter, Prosective Cohort [abstract]. In: American Urologic Association (AUA) Annual Meeting; 2006 May 22; Atlanta, GA, Abstract nr 1151. 2006; Abstract nr 1151
20. Su LM, Smith JA Jr. Laparoscopic and robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy. In Wein AJ, Kavoussi LR, Novick AC, Partin AW, Peters CA eds, Campbell-Walsh Urology, 10th edn, Vol. 3. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2012: 2830-49
21. Freire MP, Choi WW, Lei Y, Carvas F, Hu JC. Overcoming the learning curve for robotic-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy. Urol Clin North Am 2010; 37: 37-47
22. Birkmeyer JD, Stukel TA, Siewers AE, Goodney PP, Wennberg DE, Lucas FL. Surgeon volume and operative mortality in the United States. N Engl J Med 2003; 349: 2117-27 (Pubitemid 37464537)
23. Williams SB, Amarasekera CA, Gu X et al. Influence of surgeon and hospital volume on radical prosatatectomy costs. J Urol 2012; 188: 2198-202
24. National Cancer Institute Funded Research Portfolio. Available at: http://www.cancer.gov/researchandfunding. Accessed January 2012
25. Zilberman DE, Tsivian M, Yong D, Albala DM. Surgical steps that elongate operative time in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy among the obese population. J Endourol 2011; 25: 793-6
26. Voelker R. Escalating obesity rates pose health, budget threats. JAMA 2012; 308: 1514
27. Ho T, Gerber L, Aronson WJ et al. Obesity, prostate-specific antigen nadir, and biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy: biology or technique? Results from the SEARCH database. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 910-6
28. Hu JC, Gold KF, Pashos CL, Mehta SS, Litwin MS. Role of surgeon volume in radical prostatectomy outcomes. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 401-5 (Pubitemid 46606466)
29. Hu JC, Prasad SM, Gu X et al. Determinants of performing radical prostatectomy pelvic lymph node dissection and the number of lymph nodes removed in elderly men. Urology 2011; 77: 402-6
30. Liu JJ, Maxwell BG, Jeon SH, Panousis P, Leppert J, Chung B. Perioperative outcomes for laparoscopic and robotic prostatectomy using the national surgical quality improvement program (NSQIP) database [abstract]. In:Western Section of the American Urologic Association (WSAUA); 2012 Oct 7-12 19-23:Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, Abstract nr 09-26. 2012