Radiographic outcomes of preoperative CT scan-derived patient-specific total ankle arthroplasty

Foot and Ankle International

Volumn 36, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 1163-1169

  Hsu, Andrew R ^a   Davis, W Hodges ^a   Cohen, Bruce E ^a   Jones, Carroll P ^a   Ellington, J Kent ^a   Anderson, Robert B ^a  

^a ORTHOCAROLINA HIP AND KNEE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

arthritis; INBONE II; Infinity; patient specific instrumentation; preoperative navigation; PROPHECY; total ankle arthroplasty

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANKLE PROSTHESIS; ANKLE RADIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; CASE STUDY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; ORTHOPEDIC SURGEON; PICTURE ARCHIVING AND COMMUNICATION SYSTEM; PREOPERATIVE EVALUATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REPRODUCIBILITY; RESURFACING DEVICE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; TREATMENT PLANNING; WEIGHT BEARING; ANKLE; ANKLE REPLACEMENT; COHORT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION STUDY; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RADIOGRAPHY; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURGERY; TIME FACTOR; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ANKLE; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, ANKLE; COHORT STUDIES; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; JOINT PROSTHESIS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PRECISION MEDICINE; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84942894716     PISSN: 10711007     EISSN: 19447876     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1071100715585561     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Adams SB Jr, Demetracopoulos CA, Viens NA, et al. Comparison of extramedullary versus intramedullary referencing for tibial component alignment in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2013; 34 (12): 1624-1628.
2. Ast MP, Nam D, Haas SB,. Patient-specific instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a review. Orthop Clin North Am. 2012; 43 (5): e17-e22.
3. Berlet GC, Penner MJ, Lancianese S, Stemniski PM, Obert RM,. Total ankle arthroplasty accuracy and reproducibility using preoperative CT scan-derived, patient-specific guides. Foot Ankle Int. 2014; 35 (7): 665-676.
4. Boonen B, Schotanus MG, Kort NP,. Preliminary experience with the patient-specific templating total knee arthroplasty. Acta Orthop. 2012; 83 (4): 387-393.
5. Ellington JK, Gupta S, Myerson MS,. Management of failures of total ankle replacement with the agility total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95 (23): 2112-2118.
6. Glazebrook MA, Arsenault K, Dunbar M,. Evidence-based classification of complications in total ankle arthroplasty. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30 (10): 945-949.
7. Haddad SL, Coetzee JC, Estok R, et al. Intermediate and long-term outcomes of total ankle arthroplasty and ankle arthrodesis: a systematic review of the literature. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007; 89 (9): 1899-1905.
8. Hintermann B, Zwicky L, Knupp M, Henninger HB, Barg A,. HINTEGRA revision arthroplasty for failed total ankle prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95 (13): 1166-1174.
9. Hsu AR, Anderson RB, Cohen BE,. 5 points on total ankle arthroplasty. Am J Orthop (Belle Mead NJ). 2014; 43 (10): 451-457.
10. Hsu AR, Gross CE, Bhatia S, Levine BR,. Template-directed instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: cost savings analysis. Orthopedics. 2012; 35 (11): e1596-e1600.
11. Hsu AR, Haddad SL,. Early clinical and radiographic outcomes of intramedullary-fixation total ankle arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97 (3): 194-200.
12. Hsu AR, Haddad SL, Myerson MS,. Evaluation and management of the painful total ankle arthroplasty. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2015; 23 (5): 272-282.
13. Hsu AR, Kim JD, Bhatia S, Levine BR,. Effect of training level on accuracy of digital templating in primary total hip and knee arthroplasty. Orthopedics. 2012; 35 (2): e179-e183.
14. Jonck JH, Myerson MS,. Revision total ankle replacement. Foot Ankle Clin. 2012; 17 (4): 687-706.
15. Kakkar R, Siddique MS,. Stresses in the ankle joint and total ankle replacement design. Foot Ankle Surg. 2011; 17 (2): 58-63.
16. Koeck FX, Beckmann J, Luring C, et al. Evaluation of implant position and knee alignment after patient-specific unicompartmental knee arthroplasty. Knee. 2011; 18 (5): 294-299.
17. Krishnan SP, Dawood A, Richards R, Henckel J, Hart AJ,. A review of rapid prototyped surgical guides for patient-specific total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012; 94 (11): 1457-1461.
18. Nam D, McArthur BA, Cross MB, et al. Patient-specific instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a review. J Knee Surg. 2012; 25 (3): 213-219.
19. Nunley RM, Ellison BS, Zhu J, et al. Do patient-specific guides improve coronal alignment in total knee arthroplasty? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2012; 470 (3): 895-902.
20. Queen RM, Adams SB Jr, Viens NA, et al. Differences in outcomes following total ankle replacement in patients with neutral alignment compared with tibiotalar joint malalignment. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2013; 95 (21): 1927-1934.