Contextual categorization: A mechanism linking perception and knowledge in modeling and simulating perceived events as actions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2116, Issue , 2001, Pages 395-408

  Zibetti, Elisabetta ^a   Quera, Vicenç ^b   Beltran, Francesc Salvador ^b   Tijus, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BARCELONA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL LIFE;

COMPUTER IMPLEMENTATIONS; COMPUTER MODELING; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXTS; INTERACTIVE AGENTS; MODEL APPROACH; MODELING AND SIMULATING; WEAK POINTS;

AUTONOMOUS AGENTS;

EID: 84942863204     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44607-9_30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Ayes, D., & Shah, M. (1998): Monitoring Human Behavior in an Office Environment. In Proceeding of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop: The Interpretation ofVisual Motion, CVPR’98, Santa Barbara, CA, June 22. 65-72.
2. Barbut, M., & Monjardet, B. (1970). Ordre et Classification: algèbre et combinatoire. Paris. Hachette.
3. Barsalou, L.W. (1983). Ad Hoc Categories. Memory and Cognition, 11, 211-227.
4. Barsalou, L.W. (1991). Deriving categories to achieve goals. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 27, (1-64). New York: Academic Press.
5. Brooks, R.A. (1991). Intelligence without representation. Artificial Intelligence, 47, 139-159.
6. Cordier, F., & Tijus, C. A. (2000). Propriétés d'Objets: Typologie et Organisation. Actes du XXVI/ Congrès International de Psychologie, Montréal, 26-29 juillet 2000.
7. Gibson, J. (1977). The Theory of affordance. In R.E. Shaw, & J. Brandsford (Eds.) Perceiving, acting, and knowing. Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum
8. Gibson, J. (1979). The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception. Boston, M.A.: Houghton Mifflin.
9. Intille, S. S. (1999). Visual recognition of Multy-Agent action. Ph.D. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
10. Intille, S. S., & Bobick, A.F. (1998). Representation and Visual Recognition of Complex, Multi-agent Actions using Beliefs Networks. In Proceeding of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop: The Interpretation ofVisual Motion, CVPR’98, Santa Barbara, CA, June 22. 73-80.
11. Langton, C.G. (1989). Artificial life. In C.G. Langton (Ed.), Artificial life. The proceedings of an interdisciplinary workshop on the synthesis and simulation of living systems (pp.1-47). Redwood City, Ca: Addison-Wesley.
12. Maes, P. (1998). Modeling adaptive autonomous agents. In C.G. Langton (Ed.), Artificial life. An overview (pp. 135-162). MIT Press.
13. Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
14. Oatley, K. & Yuill, N. (1985) Perception of personal and interpersonal action in a carton film. British Journal of Social Psychology 24, 115, 124.
15. Poitrenaud, S. (1995). The Procope Semantic Network: an alternative to action grammars. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, 31-69.
16. Quera, V., Solanas, A., Salafranca, L., Beltran, F.S., & Herrando, S. (2000). A dynamic model for inter-agent distances. In Meyer, J.-A., Berthoz, A., Floreano, D., Roitblat, H.L., Wilson, S. (Eds.), From Animals to Animats 6, SAB2000 Proceedings Supplement. Honolulu (Hawaii): USA.
17. Quera, V., Solanas, A., Salafranca, Ll., Beltran, F.S., & Herrando, S. (2000). P-SPACE: A program for simulating spatial behavior in small groups. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 32 (1), 191-196.
18. Resnick, M. (1994). Turtles, Termites, and Traffic Jams: Explorations in Massively Parallel Microworlds. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
19. Richard, J.F., & Tijus, C. A. (1998). Modeling the Affordances of Objects in Problem Solving. In A.C. Quelhas & F. Pereira (Ed.), Cognition and Context. Lisboa ISPA, 293-315.
20. Ross, B.H. (1996). Category learning as problem solving. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The Psychology of Learning and Motivation: Advances in Research and Theory, Vol. 35 (165-192). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
21. Schyns, P., Goldstone, R.L., & Thilbaut, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 21 (1): 1-54.
22. Thibadeau, R. (1986). Artificial Perception of Actions, Cognitive Science, 10, 177-149.
23. Tijus, C. A., & Moulin, F. (1997). L'assignation de signification étudiée à partir de textes d' histoires drôles. L'Année Psychologique, 97, 33-75.
24. Tijus, C. A., & Poitrenaud, S. (1997). Modeliser l’Affordance des Objets. Actes du 6ème colloque: Sciences Cognitives, Individus et Société, p 57-65.
25. Tijus, C.A., (1996). Assignation de signification et construction de la réprésentation. Habilitation à diriger les recherches. Université de Paris 8.
26. Turner, R. M. (1999). Model of Explicit Context Representation and Une for Intelligent Agents. In J.G. Carbonell & J. Siekmann (eds), Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1688, Modeling and Using Context, (pp. 375-388). New-York: Springer.
27. Yamauchi, T., & Markman, A. (1998). Category Learning by Inference and Classification. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 124-148.
28. Zibetti, E., Hamilton, E. & Tijus, C.A. (under revision). Contextual Categorization in Interpreting Perceived Actions: The Role of Objects Properties. Cognitive Science.
29. Zibetti, E., Hamilton, E., & Tijus C.A. (1999). The role of Context in Interpreting Perceived Events as Action. In J.G. Carbonell & J. Siekmann (eds), Lectures Notes in Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1688, Modeling and Using Context, (pp. 431-441). New-York: Springer.
30. Zibetti, E., Poitrenaud, S., & Tijus, C.A. (in press). La construction de la représentation de l'action perçue. Intellectica.