The role of context in interpreting perceived events as actions

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 1688, Issue , 1999, Pages 431-441

  Zibetti, Elisabetta ^a   Hamilton, Elizabeth ^a   Tijus, Charles ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS 8   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; COMPUTERS;

ACTION MODELS; DYNAMIC ALLOCATIONS; ENVIRONMENTAL CONTEXTS; OBJECT PROPERTY; TEMPORAL INFORMATION; TEMPORAL RELATION;

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE;

EID: 8344282288     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/3-540-48315-2_33     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Bobick, A.F. (1997). Mouvement, Activity, and action: The role of knowledge in perception of motion. In Proceedings of the Royal Society Workshop on Knowledge-based Vision in Man and Machine, February.
2. Gergely, G., Nadasdy, Z., Csibra, G., & Biro S. (1995). Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition, 56 (2), 165-193.
3. Csibra, G., Gergely, G., Biro S., & Koos, O. & Brockbank, M. (forthcoming). Goal Attribution without Agency Cues: The Perception of’ Pure Reason’ in infancy.
4. Heider, F., & Simmel, M., (1944). An Experimental Study of Apparent Behavior. American Journal of Psychology, 57, 243-259.
5. Intille, S. S., & Bobick, A.F. (1998). Representation and Visual Recognition of Complex, Multi-agent Actions using Beliefs Networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop: The Interpretation of Visual Motion, CVPR’98, Santa Barbara, CA, June 22. 73-80
6. Kintch, W. (1974). The Representation of Meaning in Memory. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
7. Medin, D. L. (1975). A theory of contxt in discrimination learning. In G. Bower (Ed.) The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol.9). New York:Accademic Press.
8. Michotte, A.E. (1963). The Perception of Causality (E. Miles & T. R. Miles, Trans). New York: Basic Books.
9. Miller, G. A., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1976). Language and Perception. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Univ. Press.
10. Newtson, D. (1973). Attribution and the Unit of Perception of Ongoing Behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 28-38.
11. Newtson, D., & Engquist, G (1976). The Perceptual Organisation of Ongoing Behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 12, 436-450.
12. Newtson, D., Engquist, G., & Bois, J. (1977). The Objective Basis of Behavior Units. Personality and Social Psychology, 35 (12), 847,862.
13. Newtson, D., & Rinder, R (1979). Variation in Behavior Perception and Ability Attribution. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37,1847-1858.
14. Norman, D. A., & Rumelhart, D. E. (1975). Explorations in Cognition. San Francisco: Freeman.
15. Poitrenaud, S. (1995). The Procope Semantic Network: an alternative to action grammars. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies,42, 31-69.
16. Premack, D., (1990). The infant’s theory of self-propelled objects. Cognition, 36 (2), 1-16.
17. Premack, D., (1995). Cause/induced motion: Intention/spontaneous motion. in Changeux, J.P., Chavaillon, J.: Origins of the human brain. (Eds). Oxford: Clarendon Press. (pp. 286-309).
18. Richard, J.F., & Tijus, C. A. (1998). Modelling the Affordances of Objects in Problem Solving. In A.C. Quelhas & F. Pereira (Ed.), Cognition and Context. Lisboa ISPA, 293-315.
19. Rosales, R. & Sclaroff, S. (1998). Improved Tracking of Multiple Humans with Trajectory Prediction and Occlusion Modeling. In Proceeding of the IEEE Computer Society Workshop: The Interpretation of Visual Motion, CVPR’98, Santa Barbara, CA, June 22. 73-80.
20. Thibadeau, R. (1986). Artificial Perception of Actions, Cognitive Science, 10,177-149.
21. Thommen, E. (1991). La genése de la perception de l'intentionnalité dans le mouvement apparent. Archives de Psychologie, 59, 195-223.
22. Tijus, C.A., & Moulin, F. (1997). L'assignation de signification étudiée à partir de textes d' histoires drôles. L'année Psychologique, 97, 33-75.
23. Tijus, C. A. & Poitrenaud, S. (1997). Modeliser l’Affordance des Objets. Actes du 6ème colloque: Sciences Cognitives, Individus et Société, p 57-65.
24. Zacks, J. and Tversky, B. (1997). What’s happening? The Structure of Event Perception. In Proceedings of the 19th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Stanford, CA.
25. Zibetti, E., & Tijus, C. A. (1997). L'Effet des Propriétés d'Objet sur l'Interprétation de l'Action Perçue. In Actes du Colloque des Journées Internationales d'Orsay sur les Sciences Cognitives, JIOSC 97. Centre Scientifique d’Orsay, 1-2 december 1997. 197-202.
26. Zibetti, E., Hamilton, E. & Tijus, C.A. (en revision). The role of visual components in interpreting perceived actions.