Phase II pragmatic randomized controlled trial of patient-led therapies (Mirror Therapy and Lower-Limb Exercises) during inpatient stroke rehabilitation

Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Volumn 29, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 818-826

  Tyson, Sarah ^a,b   Wilkinson, Jack ^a,c   Thomas, Nessa ^a,b   Selles, Ruud ^d   McCabe, Candy ^e   Tyrrell, Pippa ^a,c   Vail, Andy ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^b Midwifery and Social Work   (United Kingdom)

^c SALFORD ROYAL NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

^d ERASMUS MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^e UNIVERSITY OF THE WEST OF ENGLAND   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

exercise; mirror therapy; patient led; stroke

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARM EXERCISE; ARTICLE; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FEMALE; GRIP STRENGTH; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LEG EXERCISE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MIRROR THERAPY; MULTICENTER STUDY; NEGLECT; PHASE 2 CLINICAL TRIAL; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PROGRAM ACCEPTABILITY; PROGRAM FEASIBILITY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION CARE; SELF CARE; SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE; SURVIVOR; VERY ELDERLY; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONVALESCENCE; KINESIOTHERAPY; LOWER LIMB; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER LIMB;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; EXERCISE THERAPY; FEMALE; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; LOWER EXTREMITY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHYSICAL THERAPY MODALITIES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UPPER EXTREMITY;

EID: 84942569698     PISSN: 15459683     EISSN: 15526844     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1545968314565513     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kwakkel G, van Peppen R, Wagenaar RC, et al. Effects of augmented exercise therapy time after stroke: a meta-analysis. Stroke. 2004; 35: 2529-2539.
2. Van Peppen RP, Kwakkel G, Wood-Dauphinee S, et al. The impact of physical therapy on functional outcomes after stroke: what's the evidence? Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18: 833-862.
3. Esmonde T, McGinley J, Wittwer J, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: patient activity during non-therapy time. Aust J Physiother. 1997; 43: 43-51.
4. Bernhardt J, Chan J, James NI, et al. Little therapy, little physical activity: rehabilitation within the first 14 days of organized stroke unit care. J Rehabil Med. 2007; 39: 43-48.
5. Bernhardt J, Dewey HM, Thrift AG, et al. Inactive and alone: physical activity in the first 14 days of acute stroke unit care. Stroke. 2004; 35: 1005-1009.
6. Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party, Royal College of Physicians. National sentinel stroke audit 2010 round 7. https://www.rcplondon.ac.uk/sites/default/files/national-sentinel
7. Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, et al. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation. A multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009; 40: 2123-2128.
8. Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK, Lindmark B,. An evaluation of two different exercise regimes during the first year following stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Physiother Theory Pract. 2009; 25: 55-68.
9. Olney SJ, Nymark J, Brouwer B, et al. A randomized controlled trial of supervised versus unsupervised exercise programs for ambulatory stroke survivors. Stroke. 2006; 37: 476-481.
10. West T, Bernhardt J,. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat. 2012; 2012: 813765.
11. Thieme H, Mehrholz J, Pohl M, et al. Mirror therapy for improving motor function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(3): CD008449.
12. Michielsen ME, Selles RW, van der Geest JN, et al. Motor recovery and cortical reorganization after mirror therapy in chronic stroke patients: a phase II randomized controlled trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2011; 25: 223-233.
13. Ada L, Dorsch S, Canning CG,. Strengthening interventions increase strength and improve activity after stroke: a systematic review. Aust J Physiother. 2006; 52: 241-248.
14. Demeurrisse G, Demol O, Robaye E,. Motor evaluation in vascular hemiplegia. Eur Neurol. 1980; 19: 382-389.
15. Sunderland A, Tinson D, Bradley L, et al. Arm function after stroke: an evaluation of grip strength as a measure of recovery and a prognostic indicator. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1989; 52: 1267-1272.
16. Winward C, Halligan P, Wade D,. The Rivermead Assessment of somatosensory performance: standardisation and reliability data. Clin Rehabil. 2002; 16: 523-533.
17. Bohannon R, Smith M,. Inter-rater reliability of a Modified Ashworth Scale of muscle spasticity. Phys Ther. 1987; 67: 206-207.
18. Wilson B, Cockburn J, Halligan P,. Development of a behavioral test of visuo-spatial neglect. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1987; 68: 98-102.
19. Platz T, Pinkowski C, van Wijck F, et al. Reliability and validity of arm function assessment with standardized guidelines for the Fugl-Meyer Test, Action Research Arm Test and Box and Block Test: a multicentre study. Clin Rehabil. 2005; 19: 404-411.
20. Collen FM, Wade DT, Robb GF, et al. The Rivermead Mobility Index: a further development of the Rivermead Motor Assessment. Int Disabil Stud. 1991; 13: 50-54.
21. Tyson SF, DeSouza LH,. Development of the Brunel Balance Assessment: a new measure of balance disability post stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2004; 18: 801-810.
22. Hennessey ML, Rumrill PD,. Treatment fidelity in rehabilitation research. J Vocal Rehabil. 2003: 19; 123-126.
23. Thieme H, Bayn M, Wurg M, et al. Mirror therapy for patients with severe arm paresis after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2012; 27: 314-324.
24. Dohle C, Püllen J, Nakaten A, et al. Mirror therapy promotes recovery from severe hemiparesis. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2009; 23: 209-217.
25. Deconinck FJ, Smorenburg AR, Benham A, Ledebt A, Feltham M, Savelsbergh GJ,. Reflections on mirror therapy a systematic review of the effect of mirror visual feedback on the brain. [published online 26, 2014 ]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. doi: 10.1177/1545968314546134.