On moving targets and magic bullets: Can the UK lead the way with responsible data linkage for health research?

International Journal of Medical Informatics

Volumn 84, Issue 11, 2015, Pages 933-940

  Laurie, G ^a   Ainsworth, J ^b   Cunningham, J ^b   Dobbs, C ^c   Jones, K H ^c   Kalra, D ^d   Lea, N C ^d   Sethi, N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

^c SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Data linkage; Electronic health records; Health research; Information governance; Secondary uses

Indexed keywords

DATA HANDLING; HEALTH;

DATA LINKAGE; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; HEALTH RESEARCH; INFORMATION GOVERNANCE; SECONDARY USE;

HEALTH RISKS;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ELECTRONIC MEDICAL RECORD; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED KINGDOM; WELLBEING; ANIMAL; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORD; ETHICS; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; NATIONAL HEALTH SERVICE; PROCEDURES; PUBLIC RELATIONS; RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; STANDARDS;

ANIMALS; CONFIDENTIALITY; ELECTRONIC HEALTH RECORDS; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INFORMED CONSENT; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; RESEARCH; STATE MEDICINE; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 84942550858     PISSN: 13865056     EISSN: 18728243     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2015.08.011     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. PwC, 'Data Release Review', Health and Social Care Information Centre, 2014 available at (accessed 11.07.14); 'Careless.data', Nature (editorial) 507, 7 (06 March 2014) 10.1038/507007a; B Goldacre, 'Care.data is in chaos, It breaks my heart', Comment in The Guardian, 28 February 2014 available at: (accessed 24.04.14). http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/feb/28/care-data-is-in-chaos.
2. NHS England, NHS England acts in response to concerns about information sharing-statement from Tim Kelsey, National Director for Patients and Information, 19 Feb 2014 available at (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.england.nhs.uk/2014/02/19/response-info-share/.
3. Digital Health.Net, Care.data re-launched this month, 11 June 2015, available at (accessed 02.08.15). http://www.digitalhealth.net/news/29947/.
4. Carter P., Laurie G., Dixon-Woods M. The Social licence for research: why care.data ran into trouble 41:5. J. Med. Ethics 2015, 404-409. 10.1136/medethics-2014-102374.
5. Department of Health, Information: To share or not to share? The Information Governance Review, March 2013 available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/192572/2900774_InfoGovernance:accv2.pdf.
6. Information Governance Review, 2013 (above), page 21.
7. Cabinet Office, Initial Discussion Document on Data Sharing Policy, 9 April 2014, available at: (accessed 11.07.14). http://datasharing.org.uk/.
8. Section 117(4) Care Act 2014 (as included in the Act pre-amendment) available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/section/117/enacted.
9. Academy of Medical Sciences, Personal data for public good: using health information in medical research, January 2006 available at: and 'A new pathway for the regulation and governance of health research', January 2011 available at: (both accessed 20.06.14). http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/viewFile/publicationDownloads/newpathw.pdf.
10. Nuffield Council on Bioethics, The collection, linking and use of data in biomedical research and health care: ethical issues (2015), available at: , (accessed 04.08.15). http://nuffieldbioethics.org/project/biological-health-data/.
11. SAIL stands for Secure Anonymised Information Linkage. SAIL is a Wales-wide research resource focused on improving health, well-being and services. Its databank of anonymised data about the population of Wales is world recognised. SAIL receives core funding from the Welsh Government's National Institute of Social Care and Health Research (NISCHR).
12. Jones K.H., Ford D.V., Jones C., D'Silva R., Thompson S., Brooks C.J., Heaven M.L., Thayer D.S., McNerney C.L., Lyons R.A. A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL) gateway: a privacy protecting remote access system for health related research and evaluation. J. Biomed. Inform. 2015, in press, January 2014. 10.1016/j.jbi.2014.01.003.
13. Ainsworth J., Buchan I. Preserving consent-for-consent with feasibility-assessment and recruitment in clinical studies: FARSITE architecture. Stud. Health Technol. Inform. 2009, 147:137-148. 10.3233/978-1-60750-027-8-137.
14. UCL, What is the IDHS Technical Solution? Available at (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.ucl.ac.uk/isd/itforslms/services/handling-sens-data/tech-soln.
15. Farr Institute website available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.farrinstitute.org.
16. Health and Social Care Act 2012 establishing the Health and Social Care Information Centre available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2012/7/part/9/chapter/2/enacted.
17. Section 117, Care Act 2014 available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/section/117/enacted.
18. Laurie G., Postan E. Rhetoric or reality: what is the legal status of consent forms in medical research?. Med. Law Rev. 2013, 21(3):371-414. 10.1093/medlaw/fws031.
19. Schedule 2 (1) Data Protection Act 1998 available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1998/29/schedule/2.
20. Laurie and Postan, Rhetoric or Reality (above).
21. Nuffield Trust, Access to person-level data in health-care, (August 2011) available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://www.nuffieldtrust.org.uk/sites/files/nuffield/publication/access_to_person-level_data_in_health_care-research_summary-aug11_0.pdf.
22. See for example, Law Commission, Data sharing between public and private bodies: a scoping report, (LAW COM no 351) (2014). Available at (accessed 11.07.14). http://lawcommission.justice.gov.uk/docs/lc351_data-sharing.pdf.
23. Information Commissioner's Office, Anonymisation: managing data protection risk code of practice, (2012). Available at: (accessed 18.06.14). http://ico.org.uk/for_organisations/data_protection/topic_guides/~/media/documents/library/Data_Protection/Practical_application/anonymisation-codev2.pdf.
24. Health and Social Care Act 2001 available at: http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2001/15/part/5 and relatedly section 251 NHS Act 2006 available at: (both accessed 14.07.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/41/part/13/crossheading/patient-information.
25. CAG website available at (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.hra.nhs.uk/resources/confidentiality-advisory-group/.
26. PIAG and CAG efforts to be transparent about processes. See CAG website available at: (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.hra.nhs.uk/resources/confidentiality-advisory-group/.
27. PAC website available at: (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.nhsnss.org/pages/corporate/privacy_advisory_committee.php.
28. NHS Scotland, Public Benefit and Privacy Panel for Health and Social Care, May 2015 available at (accessed 02.08.15). http://www.informationgovernance.scot.nhs.uk.
29. Care Act 2014 available at: (accessed 11.07.14). http://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2014/23/section/111/enacted.
30. All research proposals are submitted to an independent Information Governance Review Panel (IGRP). The IGRP includes representation from the BMA, Public Health Wales, NWIS, National Research Ethics Committee, and the public (members of the Consumer Panel for Data Linkage Research). Approval is given only if the research is appropriate and in the public interest.
31. Kahn M., Raebel M., Glanz J., Riedlinger K., Steiner J. A pragmatic framework for single-site and multisite data quality assessment in electronic health record-based clinical research. Med. Care 2012, 50:s21-s29. 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318257dd67.
32. Scottish Health Informatics Programme website available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.scot-ship.ac.uk.
33. Sethi N., Laurie G. Delivering proportionate governance in the era of ehealth: making linkage and privacy work together. Med. Law Int. 2015, 13(2-3):168-204. 10.1177/0968533213508974.
34. Laurie G., Sethi N. Towards principles-based approaches to governance of health-related research using personal data. Eur. J. Risk Regul. 2013, 1:43-57. 10.1177/0968533213508974.
35. F Ritchie, 'Access to business microdata in the UK: Dealing with the irreducible risks', Monographs of Official Statistics-Work Session on Statistical Data Confidentiality, (2005), UNECE/Eurostat 239-244. Available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://eprints.uwe.ac.uk/22438/1/wp.29e.pdf.
36. S. Davidson, C. McLean, S. Treanor, M. Aitken, S. Cunningham-Burley, G. Laurie, C. Pagliari, N. Sethi. Public Acceptability of Data Sharing Between the Public, Private and Third Sectors for Research Purposes', APS Group Scotland, 2013. 130 p. Available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/0043/00435458.pdf.
37. SHIP Public Engagement Reports, available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.scot-ship.ac.uk/publications.html.
38. Haddow G., Laurie G., Cunningham-Burley S., Hunter K. Tackling community concerns about commercialisation and genetic research: a modest interdisciplinary proposal. Soc. Sci. Med. 2007, 64(2):272-282. 10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.08.028.
39. Haddow et al., Tackling Community Concerns, (above).
40. Haddow et al., Tackling Community Concerns (above) and S Davidson et al., 'Public Acceptability of Data Sharing' (above).
41. KH Jones et al., A case study of the Secure Anonymous Information Linkage (SAIL), (above).
42. Jones K.H., McNerney C., Ford D. Involving consumers in the work of a data linkage research unit. Int. J. Consum. Stud. 2014, 38(1):45-51. 10.1111/ijcs.12062.
43. Farr Institute website, . http://www.farrinstitute.org/centre/CIPHER/110_The-Consumer-Panel-.html.
44. Digital Catapult, Trust in Personal Data: A UK Review, (2015).
45. The ADRN website, . http://adrn.ac.uk/.
46. HM Revenue and Customs, Sharing and publishing data for public benefit Consultation document, July 2013 at p.9 available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/223931/130717_Data_sharing_condoc_final_v2.pdf.
47. The UK. Administrative Data Research Network: Improving Access for Research and Policy, 'Report from the Administrative Data Taskforce', December 2012 available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://www.esrc.ac.uk/_images/ADT-Improving-Access-for-Research-and-Policy_tcm8-24462.pdf.
48. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Improving access for research and policy: the government response to the report of the Administrative Data Taskforce, June, 2013 available at: (accessed 20.06.14). http://https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/206873/bis-13-920-government-response-administrative-data-taskforce.pdf.
49. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Improving access (above), p. 7.
50. Department for Business, Innovation and Skills, Improving access (above) p.15.
51. Kaye Jane 'Dynamic consent: a patient interface for twenty-first century research networks'. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 2014, 1-6. 10.1038/ejhg.2014.71.
52. The Royal Society, Science as an Open Enterprise, Final Report, June 2012 available at: (accessed 14.07.14). http://https://royalsociety.org/~/media/policy/projects/sape/2012-06-20-saoe.pdf.