Ergon-trial: ergonomic evaluation of single-port access versus three-port access video-assisted thoracic surgery

Surgical Endoscopy

Volumn 29, Issue 10, 2015, Pages 2934-2940

  Bertolaccini, Luca ^a   Viti, Andrea ^b   Terzi, Alberto ^a  

^a SACRO CUORE DON CALABRIA HOSPITAL   (Italy)

^b S CROCE E CARLE HOSPITAL   (Italy)

Author keywords

Ergonomics; Mental workload; Physical workload; Video assisted thoracic surgery

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ERGONOMICS; HEAD; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATING TABLE; OPERATION DURATION; PHYSICAL STRESS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; SINGLE PORT VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY; THREE PORT VIDEO ASSISTED THORACIC SURGERY; TRUNK; VIDEO ASSISTED THORACOSCOPIC SURGERY; WEDGE RESECTION; WORKLOAD; BIOENGINEERING; COMPARATIVE STUDY; PROCEDURES; SURGEON; TASK PERFORMANCE; THINKING;

HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; POSTURE; SURGEONS; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; THINKING; THORACIC SURGERY, VIDEO-ASSISTED;

EID: 84942342355     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-4024-6     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Walker WS, Casali G (2008) The VATS lobectomist: analysis of costs and alterations in the traditional surgical working pattern in the modern surgical unit. Thorac Surg Clin 18:281–287
2. Rocco G (2012) One-port (uniportal) video-assisted thoracic surgical resections—a clear advance. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 144:S27–S31
3. Gonzalez Rivas D, Fernandez R, De La Torre M, Martin Ucar AE (2012) Thoracoscopic lobectomy through a single incision. MMCTS. doi:10.1093/mmcts/mms007
4. Welcker K, Kesieme EB, Internullo E, Kranenburg van Koppen LJC (2012) Ergonomics in thoracoscopic surgery: results of a survey among thoracic surgeons. Interact CardioVasc Thorac Surg 15:197–200
5. Joice P, Hanna GB, Cuschieri A (1998) Ergonomic evaluation of laparoscopic bowel suturing. Am J Surg 176:373–378
6. Wauben LSGL, Van Veelen MA, Gossot D, Goossens RHM (2006) Application of ergonomic guidelines during minimally invasive surgery: a questionnaire survey of 284 surgeons. Surg Endosc 20:1268–1274
7. Kranenburg L, Gossot D (2004) Ergonomic problems encountered during video-assisted thoracic surgery. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol 13:147–155
8. Hanna GB, Shimi SM, Cuschieri A (1998) Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display. Ann Surg 227:481–484
9. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Totté ER, Pierie JPEN (2009) Optimal ergonomics for laparoscopic surgery in minimally invasive surgery suites: a review and guidelines. Surg Endosc 23:1279–1285
10. Van Det MJ, Meijerink WJHJ, Hoff C, Van Veelen MA, Pierie JPEN (2008) Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc 22:2421–2427
11. Seghers J, Jochem A, Spaepen A (2003) Posture, muscle activity and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings. Ergonomics 46:714–730
12. Borg G (2008) A general scale to rate symptoms and feelings related to problems of ergonomic and organizational importance. G Ital Med Lav Ergon 30:A8–A10
13. Cao A, Chintamani KK, Pandya AK, Ellis RD (2009) NASA TLX: software for assessing subjective mental workload. Behav Res Methods 41:113–117
14. Noyes JM, Bruneau DPJ (2007) A self-analysis of the NASA-TLX workload measure. Ergonomics 50:514–519
15. Hubert N, Gilles M, Desbrosses K, Meyer JP, Felblinger J, Hubert J (2013) Ergonomic assessment of the surgeon’s physical workload during standard and robotic assisted laparoscopic procedures. Int J Med Robot Comput Assist Surg 9:142–147
16. Trejo A, Jung MC, Oleynikov D, Hallbeck MS (2007) Effect of handle design and target location on insertion and aim with a laparoscopic surgical tool. Appl Ergon 38:745–753
17. Bertolaccini L, Rocco G, Viti A, Terzi A (2013) Geometrical characteristics of uniportal VATS. J Thorac Dis 5:S214–S216
18. Menozzi M, Von Buol A, Krueger H, Miège C (1994) Direction of gaze and comfort: discovering the relation for the ergonomic optimization of visual tasks. Ophthalmic Physiol Opt 14:393–399
19. Gage WH, Winter DA, Frank JS, Adkin AL (2004) Kinematic and kinetic validity of the inverted pendulum model in quiet standing. Gait Posture 19:124–132
20. Lee G, Lee T, Dexter D, Godinez C, Meenaghan N, Catania R, Park A (2009) Ergonomic risk associated with assisting in minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 23:182–188
21. Lee GI, Lee MR, Clanton T, Sutton E, Park AE, Marohn MR (2014) Comparative assessment of physical and cognitive ergonomics associated with robotic and traditional laparoscopic surgeries. Surg Endosc 28:456–465
22. Van Veelen MA, Nederlof EAL, Goossens RHM, Schot CJ, Jakimowicz JJ (2003) Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery. Surg Endosc 17:1077–1081
23. Psihogios JP, Sommerich CM, Mirka GA, Moon SD (2001) A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users. Appl Ergon 32:313–325
24. Lee G, Kavic SM, George IM, Park AE (2007) Postural instability does not necessarily correlate to poor performance: case in point. Surg Endosc 21:471–474