Ergonomic assessment of neck posture in the minimally invasive surgery suite during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 22, Issue 11, 2008, Pages 2421-2427

  Van Det, M J ^a   Meijerink, W J H J ^b   Hoff, C ^a   Van Veelen, M A ^c   Pierie, J P E N ^a  

^a MEDICAL CENTER LEEUWARDEN   (Netherlands)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c FACULTY OF INDUSTRIAL DESIGN ENGINEERING   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Ergonomics; Laparoscopic cholecystectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Neck; Operating room; Posture

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BODY POSTURE; CERVICAL SPINE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT; ERGONOMICS; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); MUSCULOSKELETAL DISEASE; NECK; NECK POSTURE; NORMAL HUMAN; NURSE; OPERATING ROOM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; ROTATION; SURGEON; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

ADULT; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CROSS-OVER STUDIES; FEMALE; HUMAN ENGINEERING; HUMANS; MALE; NECK; OPERATING ROOMS; POSTURE; QUESTIONNAIRES; ROTATION; VIDEO RECORDING;

EID: 54049084511     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-008-0042-6     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. U Berggren T Gordh D Grama U Haglund J Rastad D Arvidsson 1994 Laparoscopic versus open cholecystectomy: hospitalization, sick leave, analgesia, and trauma responses Br J Surg 81 1362 1365
2. HI Hendolin ME Paakonen EM Alhava R Tarvainen T Kemppinen P Lahtinen 2000 Laparoscopic or open cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial to compare postoperative pain, pulmonary function, and stress response Eur J Surg 166 394 399
3. C Richards J Edwards D Culver TG Emori J Tolson R Gaynes 2003 Does using a laparoscopic approach to cholecystectomy decrease the risk of surgical site infection? Ann Surg 237 358 362
4. PC Schellekens AB Bijnen M Honing J Lourens P de Ruiter 1995 Results of the introduction of laparoscopic cholecystectomy on morbidity and mortality of gallbladder surgery in a large regional hospital Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 139 723 727
5. R Berguer 1999 Surgery and ergonomics Arch Surg 134 1011 1016
6. MA Van Veelen EA Nederlof RH Goossens CJ Schot JJ Jakimowicz 2003 Ergonomic problems encountered by the medical team related to products used for minimally invasive surgery Surg Endosc 17 1077 1081
7. TA Kenyon DR Urbach JB Speer B Waterman-Hukari GF Foraker PD Hansen LL Swanstrom 2001 Dedicated minimally invasive surgery suites increase operating room efficiency Surg Endosc 15 1140 1143
8. AG Gallagher N McClure J McGuigan K Ritchie NP Sheehy 1998 An ergonomic analysis of the fulcrum effect in the acquisition of endoscopic skills Endoscopy 30 617 620
9. R Berguer DL Forkey WD Smith 1999 Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 13 466 468
10. K Erfanian FI Luks AG Kurkchubasche CW Wesselhoeft Jr TF Tracy Jr 2003 In-line image projection accelerates task performance in laparoscopic appendectomy J Pediatr Surg 38 1059 1062
11. AK Hemal M Srinivas AR Charles 2001 Ergonomic problems associated with laparoscopy J Endourol 15 499 503
12. A Vereczkei H Feussner T Negele F Fritzsche T Seitz H Bubb OP Horvath 2004 Ergonomic assessment of the static stress confronted by surgeons during laparoscopic cholecystectomy Surg Endosc 18 1118 1122
13. DM Herron M Gagner TL Kenyon LL Swanstrom 2001 The minimally invasive surgical suite enters the 21st century: a discussion of critical design elements Surg Endosc 15 415 422
14. RM Satava 2003 Disruptive visions: the operating room of the future Surg Endosc 17 104 107
15. GB Hanna SM Shimi A Cuschieri 1998 Task performance in endoscopic surgery is influenced by location of the image display Ann Surg 227 481 484
16. J Seghers A Jochem A Spaepen 2003 Posture, muscle activity, and muscle fatigue in prolonged VDT work at different screen height settings Ergonomics 46 714 730
17. B Middel FLP Van Sonderen 2002 Statistical significant change versus relevant or important change in (quasi) experimental design: some conceptual and methodological problems in estimating magnitude of intervention-related change in health services research Int J Integrated Care 2 1 21
18. Cohen J (1988) Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York
19. B Middel R Stewart J Bouma E van Sonderen WJA van den Heuvel 2001 How to validate clinically important change in health-related functional status: is the magnitude of the effect size consistently related to magnitude of change as indicated by a global question rating? J Eval Clin Pract 7 399 410
20. JP Psihogios CM Sommerich GA Mirka SD Moon 2001 A field evaluation of monitor placement effects in VDT users Appl Ergon 32 313 325
21. U Matern M Faist K Kehl C Giebmeyer G Buess 2005 Monitor position in laparoscopic surgery Surg Endosc 19 436 440
22. AM Omar NJ Wade SI Brown A Cuschieri 2005 Assessing the benefits of "gaze-down" display location in complex tasks Surg Endosc 19 105 108