Creating a biodiversity science community: Experiences from a European Network of Knowledge

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 54, Issue , 2015, Pages 497-504

  Carmen, Esther ^a   Nesshöver, Carsten ^b   Saarikoski, Heli ^c   Vandewalle, Marie ^b   Watt, Allan ^a   Wittmer, Heidi ^b   Young, Juliette ^a  

^a CENTRE FOR ECOLOGY AND HYDROLOGY   (United Kingdom)

^b HELMHOLTZ CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH UFZ   (Germany)

^c FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE   (Finland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; European research; IPBES; Network of Knowledge; Science policy interfaces

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; DECISION MAKING; ECOSYSTEM; EUROPE; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCIENCE;

EID: 84942296999     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.03.014     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Adams W.M., Sandbrook C. Conservation, evidence and policy. Oryx 2013, 47(3):329-335.
2. Arksey H., Knight P. Why Interview? Interviewing for Social Scientists: An Introductory Resource with Examples 1999, Sage, London.
3. Beierle T.C., Konisky D.M. What are we gaining from stakeholder involvement? Observations from environmental planning in the Great Lakes. Environ. Plan. 2001, 19(4):515-528.
4. Bryman A. Social Research Methods 2004, Oxford University Press, Oxford/New York.
5. Burnham P., Gilland K., Grant W., Layton-Henry Z. Research Methods in Politics 2004, Palgrave Macmillan, New York.
6. Butchart S.H.M., et al. Global biodiversity: indicators of recent declines. Science 2010, 328(5982):1164-1168.
7. Cash D.W., et al. Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2003, 100(14):8086-8091.
8. Chilvers J., Evans J. Understanding networks at the science-policy interface. Geoforum 2009, 40(3):355-362.
9. Clarke A., Dawson R. Evaluation Research: An Introduction to Principles, Methods and Practice 1999, Sage Publications, London/Thousand Oaks/New Delhi.
10. Ehrlich P.R., Pringle R.M. Where does biodiversity go from here? A grim business-as-usual forecast and a hopeful portfolio of partial solutions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2008, 105:11579-11586.
11. EPBRS Concept Note on a Network of Knowledge for Biodiversity Governance-EPBRS 2009, September.
12. Fazey I., et al. Knowledge exchange: a review of research agenda for environmental management. Environ. Conserv. 2012, 40(1):19-36.
13. Fox H.E., Christian C., Nordby C.J., Pergams O.R.W., Peterson G.D., Pyke C.R. Perceived barriers to integrating social science and conservation. Conserv. Biol. 2006, 20(6):1817-1820.
14. Freeman R. Epistemological bricolage: how practitioners make sense of learning. Admin. Soc. 2007, 39(4):476-496.
15. Hotes S., Opgenoorth L. Trust and control at the science-policy-interfaces in IPBES. Bioscience 2014, 64(4):277-278.
16. Jahn T., Bergmann M., Keil F. Transdisciplinarity: between mainstream and marginalization. Ecol. Econ. 2012, 79:1-10.
17. Koetz T., Farrell K.N., Bridgewater P. Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Int. Environ. Agreem.-Polit. Law Econ. 2012, 12(1):1-21.
18. KNEU consortium A Recommended Design for "BiodiversityKnowledge", a Network of Knowledge to Support Decision Making on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services in Europe 2014, (accessed 24.04.14). http://www.biodiversityknowldge.eu/.
19. Laurance W.F., et al. Averting biodiversity collapse in tropical forest protected areas. Nature 2012, 489:290-294.
20. Liu X.J., Zhang L.A., Hong S. Global biodiversity research during 1900-2009: a bibliometric analysis. Biodivers. Conserv. 2011, 20(4):807-826.
21. Mascia M.B., et al. Editorial: conservation and the social sciences. Conserv. Biol. 2003, 17(3):649-650.
22. Mason J. Qualitative Researching 2002, Sage, London/Thousand Oaks/Singapore.
23. Neßhöver C., et al. Improving the science-policy interface of biodiversity research projects. GAIA 2013, 22(2):99-103.
24. Pielke R., Prins G., Rayner S., Sarewitz d. Climate change 2007: lifting the taboo on adaptation. Nature 2007, 445(7128):597-598.
25. Richards L. Coding. Handling Qualitative Data 2005, Sage, London. L. Richards (Ed.).
26. Ritchie J., Spencer L., Connor W. Carrying out qualitative analysis. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers 2003, Sage, London. J. Ritchie, J. Lewis (Eds.).
27. Rothman D.S., Van Bers C., Bakkes J., Pahl-Wostl C. How to make global assessments more effective: lessons from the assessment community. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sust. 2009, 2009(1):214-218.
28. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. Public participation methods: a framework for evaluation. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 2000, 25(1):3-29.
29. Rowe G., Frewer L.J. A typology of public engagement mechanisms. Technol. Hum. Values 2005, 30(2):251-290.
30. Saldana J. The Coding Manual for Qualitative Researchers 2009, Sage, London.
31. Rubin H.J., Ruben I.S. Structuring the Interview. Qualitative interviewing the art of hearing data 2005, Sage, London. H.J. Rubin, I.S. Ruben (Eds.).
32. Sarkki S., Niemela J., Tinch R., Van den Hove S., Watt A., Young J. Balancing credibility, relevance and legitimacy: a critical assessment of trade-offs in science-policy interfaces. Sci. Public Policy 2013, 1-13.
33. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity Global Biodiversity Outlook 3 2010.
34. Silverman D. Doing Qualitative Research 2005, Sage, London/Thousands Oaks/New Delhi.
35. Spierenburg M. Getting the message across biodiversity science and policy interfaces - a review. GAIA 2012, 21(2):125-134.
36. Stirling A. Keep it complex. Nature 2010, 468(7327):1029-1031.
37. Turnhout E., Bloomfield B., Hulme M., Vogel J., Wynne B. Listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, 488:454-455.
38. UNEP Report of the Third Ad Hoc Intergovernmental and Multi-stakeholder Meeting on an Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. UNEP/IPBES/3/3 2010.
39. van den Hove S. A rationale for science-policy interfaces. Futures 2007, 39(7):807-826.
40. Vogel C., Moser S.C., Kasperson R.C., Dabelko G.D. Linking vulnerability, adaptation, and resilience science to practice: pathways, players, and partnerships. Glob. Environ. Change 2007, 17(3):349-364.
41. Vohland K., Mlambo M.C., Horta L.D., Jonsson B., Paulsch A., Martinez S.I. How to ensure a credible and efficient IPBES?. Environ. Sci. Policy 2011, 14(8):1188-1194.
42. Young J.C., et al. Improving science-policy dialogue to meet the challenges of biodiversity conservation: having conversations rather than talking at one-another. Biodivers. Conserv. 2014, 23(2):387-404.