Framing global biodiversity: IPBES between mother earth and ecosystem services

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 54, Issue , 2015, Pages 487-496

  Borie, Maud ^a   Hulme, Mike ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EAST ANGLIA   (United Kingdom)

^b KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Boundary object; Ecosystem services; Expertise; IPBES; Mother Earth; Science policy interface

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIODIVERSITY; CLIMATE CHANGE; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; GLOBAL CHANGE; GOVERNMENT; KNOWLEDGE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TECHNOLOGY; WORKSHOP;

EID: 84942295702     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: 18736416     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2015.05.009     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Agrawal A. Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Dev.Change 1995, 26(3):413-439.
2. Barry A. Technological Zones. Eur. J. Social Theory 2006, 9:239-253.
3. Beck S., et al. Towards a reflexive turn in the Governance of Global Environmental Expertise. The cases of the IPCC and the IPBES. GAIA 2014, 23(2):80-87.
4. Bjurström A., Polk M. Physical and economic bias in climate change research: a scientometric study of IPCC Third Assessment Report. Clim. Change 2011, 108:1-22.
5. Bowker G. Biodiversity datadiversity. Social Stud. Sci. 2000, 30:643-683.
6. Callon M. Some elements of a sociology of translation: domestication of the scallops and the fishermen of St Brieuc Bay. Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge? 1986, 196-223. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London. J. Law (Ed.).
7. Callon M., Latour B. Unscrewing the big Leviathan: how actors macro-structure reality and how sociologists help them to do so. Advances in Social Theory and Methodology: Toward an Integration of Micro and Macro-sociologies 1981, 277-303. Rouledge and Kegan Paul, London. K. Knorr-Cetina, A. Cicourel (Eds.).
8. Carpenter S., et al. Science for managing ecosystem services: beyond the Millenium Ecosystem Assessment. PNAS 2009, 106:1305-1312.
9. Charmaz K. Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide through Qualitative Analysis 2006, SAGE, London.
10. Clarke A. Situational Analysis: Grounded Theory after the Postmodern Turn 2005, SAGE, Thousand Oaks, CA.
11. Clarke A., Star S. The social worlds framework: a theory/methods package. The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 2008, 113-138. MIT Press. 3rd edition. J. Hackette (Ed.).
12. Convention on Biological Diversity (CBD) Aichi Biodiversity Targets for 2011-2020 2010, http://www.cbd.int/sp/targets/.
13. Cruikshank J. Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters and Social Imagination 2005, UBC Press, Vancouver.
14. Díaz S., Demissew S., Joly C., et al. A Rosetta Stone for nature's benefits to people. PLoS Biol. 2015, 13(1):e1002040.
15. Díaz S., Demissew S., Carabias J., et al. The IPBES Conceptual Framework - connecting nature and people. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2015, 14:1-16.
16. Ernstson H., Sörlin S. Ecosystem services as technology of globalization: on articulating values in urban nature. Ecol. Econ. 2013, 86:274-284.
17. Fyfe G., Law J. Picturing Power: Visual Depiction and Social Relations 1988, Routledge, London.
18. Haraway D. Situated knowledges: the science question in feminism and the privilege of partial perspective. Feminist Stud. 1988, 14(3):575-599. 10.2307/3178066.
19. Global Biodiversity Assessment 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. V. Heywood (Ed.).
20. Hulme M. Problems with making and governing global kinds of knowledge. Global Environ. Change 2010, 20(4):558-564.
21. Hulme M. Meet the humanities. Nat. Clim. Change 2011, 1(4):177-179.
22. Hulme M., Mahony M. Climate change: what do we know about the IPCC. Prog. Phys. Geogr. 2010, 34:705-718.
23. Hulme M., et al. Science-policy interface: beyond assessments. Science 2011, 333(6043):697-698.
24. IPBES Functions, Operating Principles and Institutional Arrangements of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (as adopted in Panama, April 2012) 2012, http://www.ipbes.net/images/Functions operating principles and institutional arrangements of IPBES_2012.pdf.
25. Jasanoff S. States of Knowledge: The Coproduction of Science and Social Order 2004, Routledge, London.
26. Jasanoff S. A new climate for society. Theory Cult. Soc. 2010, 27(2-3):233-253.
27. Jasanoff S., Martello M. Earthly Politics: Local and Global in Environmental Governance 2004, MIT Press, Cambridge.
28. Koetz T., Farrell K., Bridgewater P. Building better science-policy interfaces for international environmental governance: assessing potential within the Intergovernmental Platform for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services. Int. Environ. Agreements Polit. Law Econ. 2011, 12:1-21.
29. Larigauderie A., et al. Biodiversity and ecosystem services science for a sustainable planet: The DIVERSITAS vision for 2012-20. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2012, 4(1):101-105.
30. Larigauderie A., Mooney H. The Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services: moving a step closer to an IPCC-like mechanism for biodiversity. Curr. Opin. Environ. Sustain. 2010, 2(1-2):9-14.
31. Mace G., Norris K., Fitter A. Biodiversity and ecosystem services: a multilayered relationship. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2012, 27:19-25.
32. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment Ecosystems and Human Well-being: A Framework for Assessment 2003, Island Press, Washington.
33. Mooney H., Duraiappah A., Larigauderie A. Evolution of natural and social science interactions in global change research programs. PNAS 2013, 110(supplement 1):3665-3672.
34. Ostrom E. Governing the Commons 1990, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
35. Ostrom E. Polycentric systems for coping with collective action and global environmental change. Global Environ. Change 2010, 20(4):550-557.
36. Palsson G., et al. Reconceptualizing the Anthropos in the Anthropocene: integrating the social sciences and humanities in global environmental change research. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 28:3-13.
37. Plurinational State of Bolivia Conceptual Framework for the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services 2013, http://www.ipbes.net/images/documents/Bolivia_comments%20on%20background%20document%20on%20IPBES%20Conceptual%20Framework.pdf.
38. Plurinational State of Bolivia, 2010. Law of the Rights of Mother Earth (Law 071).
39. Scoones I. The politics of global assessments: the case of the International Assessment of Agricultural Knowledge, Science and Technology for Development (IAASTD). J. Peasant Stud. 2009, 36(3):547-571.
40. Sörlin S. Reconfiguring environmental expertise. Environ. Sci. Policy 2013, 28:14-24.
41. Star S. This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept. Sci. Technol. Human Values 2010, 35(5):601-617.
42. Star S.L., Griesemer J.R. Institutional Ecology, 'Translations' and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley's Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-39. Social Stud. Sci. 1989, 19(3):387-420.
43. Stirling A. Opening up and closing down. Sci. Technol. Human Values 2008, 33(2):262-294.
44. Turnbull D. Reframing science and other local knowledge traditions. Futures 1997, 29(6):551-562.
45. Turnhout E., et al. Conservation policy: listen to the voices of experience. Nature 2012, 488(7412):454-455.
46. Turnhout E., et al. Rethinking biodiversity: from goods and services to living with. Conserv. Lett. 2013, 6(3):154-161.
47. Turnhout E., Neves K., de Lister E. Measurementality in biodiversity governance: knowledge, transparency, and the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES). Environ. Plann. A 2014, 46(3):581-597.
48. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Outcome of an Informal Expert Workshop on Main Issues Relating to the Development of a Conceptual Framework for the IPBES (IPBES/1/INF/9) 2013.
49. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Report of the Expert Workshop on the Conceptual Framework for IPBES 2013.
50. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) Report of the second plenary session of the plenary of the Intergovernmental Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES/2/17) 2014.
51. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2015. Preliminary guide regarding diverse conceptualizations of multiple values of nature and its benefits, including biodiversity and ecosystem functions and services (IPBES/3/INF/7), p. 95.
52. United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP), 2015. Guide on the production and integration of assessments from and across all scales (IPBES/3/INF/4), p. 157.
53. Watson-Verran H., Turnbull D. Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems. Handbook of Science and Technology Studies 1995, 115-139. Sage Publishers, London.