Towards generic online multicriteria decision support in patient-centred health care

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 689-702

  Dowie, Jack ^a   Kjer Kaltoft, Mette ^b   Salkeld, Glenn ^c   Cunich, Michelle ^d  

^a LONDON SCHOOL OF HYGIENE AND TROPICAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN DENMARK   (Denmark)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

^d UNIVERSITY OF SYDNEY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Decision aid; Decision support; Multicriteria decision analysis; Patient preferences

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; COMPUTER PROGRAM; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERNET; PATIENT CARE;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; HUMANS; INTERNET; PATIENT-CENTERED CARE; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84942295147     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12111     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R et al. GRADE guidelines: 2. Framing the question and deciding on important outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 2011; 64: 395-400.
2. Mulley A, Trimble C, Elwyn G. Patients' Preferences Matter: Stop the Silent Misdiagnosis. London: King's Fund, 2012.
3. Lin G, Trujillo L, Frosch DL. Consequences of not respecting patient preferences for cancer screening. Archives of Internal Medicine, 2012; 172: 393-394.
4. Lipshitz R, Cohen MS. Warrants for prescription: analytically and empirically based approaches to improving decision making. Human Factors, 2005; 47:102-120.
5. Elwyn G, Frosch D, Volandes AE, Edwards A, Montori VM. Investing in deliberation: a definition and classification of decision support interventions for people facing difficult health decisions. Medical Decision Making, 2011; 30: 701-711.
6. Witt J, Elwyn G, Wood F, Brain K. Decision making and coping in healthcare: the Coping in Deliberation (CODE) framework. Patient Education and Counseling, 2012; 88: 256-261.
7. Elwyn G, Lloyd A, Joseph-Williams N et al. Option grids: shared decision making made easier. Patient Education and Counseling, 2012 [cited 2012 Nov 7]; Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22854227.
8. Dolan JG. Multi-criteria clinical decision support: a primer on the use of multiple criteria decision making methods to promote evidence-based, patient-centered healthcare. Patient, 2010; 3: 229-248.
9. Dolan JG. Shared decision-making-transferring research into practice: the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Patient Education and Counseling, 2008; 73: 418-425.
10. van Hummel JM, Ijzerman MJ. The use of the Analytic Hierarchy Process in Health Care Decision Making. Enschede: University Of Twente, 2009.
11. Liberatore M, Nydick R. The analytic hierarchy process in medical and health care decision making: a literature review. European Journal of Operational Research, 2008; 189: 194-207.
12. Elwyn G, Rix A, Holt T, Jones D. Why do clinicians not refer patients to online decision support tools? Interviews with front line clinics in the NHS. BMJ Open, 2012; 2: 1-7.
13. Elwyn G. The implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice: a systematic review. Implementation Science, 2013; Available at http://ipdas.ohri.ca/IPDAS-Implementa.
14. Proctor W, Drechsler M. Deliberative multicriteria evaluation. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 2006; 24: 169-190.
15. Dowie J. Researching doctors' decisions. Quality and Safety in Health Care, 2004; 13: 411-412.
16. Feldman-Stewart D, Tong C, Siemens R et al. The impact of explicit values clarification exercises in a patient decision aid emerges after the decision is actually made: evidence from a randomized controlled trial. Medical Decision Making, 2012; 32: 616-626.
17. Russell LB, Schwartz A. Looking at patients' choices through the lens of expected utility: a critique and research agenda. Medical Decision Making, 2012; 32: 527-531.
18. De Montis A, De Toro P, Droste-franke B, Omann I, Stagl S. Assessing the quality of different MCDA methods. In: Getzner M, Spash CL, Stagl S (eds) Alternatives for Environmental Evaluation. Abingdon, Oxon: Routledge, 2005: 99-133.
19. Wallenius J, Dyer JS, Fishburn PC, Steuer RE, Zionts S, Deb K. Multiple criteria decision making, multiattribute utility theory: recent accomplishments and what lies ahead. Management Science, 2008; 54: 1336-1349.
20. Van Til JA, Renzenbrink GJ, Dolan JG, Ijzerman MJ. The use of the analytic hierarchy process to aid decision making in acquired equinovarus deformity. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89: 457-462.
21. Goetghebeur MM, Wagner M, Khoury H, Rindress D, Grégoire J-P, Deal C. Combining multicriteria decision analysis, ethics and health technology assessment: applying the EVIDEM decision-making framework to growth hormone for Turner syndrome patients. Cost Effectiveness and Resource Allocation, 2010; 8: 4.
22. Tony M, Wagner M, Khoury H et al. Bridging health technology assessment (HTA) with multicriteria decision analyses (MCDA): field testing of the EVIDEM framework for coverage decisions by a public payer in Canada. BMC Health Services Research, 2011; 11: 329.
23. Dolan JG, Boohaker E, Allison J, Imperiale TF. Patients' preferences and priorities regarding colorectal cancer screening. Medical Decision Making, 2013; 53: 59-70.
24. Saaty TL. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008; 1: 83-98.
25. Richman MB, Forman EH, Bayazit Y, Einstein DB, Resnick MI, Stovsky MD. A novel computer based expert decision making model for prostate cancer disease management. The Journal of Urology, 2005; 174: 2310-2318.
26. van Hummel JM, Snoek GJ, Van Til JA, Van Rossum W, Ijzerman MJ. A multicriteria decision analysis of augmentative treatment of upper limbs in persons with tetraplegia. Journal of Rehabilitation Research And Development, 2005; 42: 635-644.
27. French S, Insua DR. Statistical Decision Theory. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.
28. Riabacke M, Danielson M, Ekenberg L. State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation. Advances in Decision Sciences, 2012; 2012: 1-24.
29. Eiring Ø, Kumar H, Kim H, Drag S, Slaughter L. Personalization in patient decision aids: state of the art and potential. 6th International Shared Decision Making conference 2011. Maastricht.
30. French S, Xu D. Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytic software. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2005; 13: 65-80.
31. Danielson M, Ekenberg L. Decision process support for participatory democracy. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis, 2008; 30 : 15-30.
32. Laffey D, Gandy A. Comparison websites in UK retail financial services. Journal of Financial Services Marketing, 2009; 14: 173-186.
33. Tsafarakis S, Lakiotaki K, Matsatsinis N. Applications of MCDA in Marketing and e-Commerce. Handbook of Multicriteria Analysis: Applied Optimization, 2010; 103: 425-448.
34. Manouselis N, Costopoulou C. Analysis and classification of multi-criteria recommender systems. World Wide Web, 2007; 10: 415-441.
35. Venkatesh V, Morris M, Davis G, Davis F. User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 2003; 27: 425-478.
36. Buxton W. Less is more (more or less). In: Denning P (ed) The Invisible Future: The Seamless Integration of Technology in Everyday Life. New York: McGraw-Hill, 2001: 145-179.
37. Buxton M. Problems in the economic appraisal of new health technology: The evaluation of heart transplants in the UK. In: Drummond M (ed.) Economic Appraisal of Health Technology in the European Community. Oxford: Oxford Medical publications, 1987: 103-118.
38. Belton V, Hodgkin J. Facilitators, decision makers, D.I.Y, users: Is intelligent multicriteria decision support for all feasible or desirable? European Journal of Operational Research, 1999; 113: 247-260.
39. Kahneman D. Thinking, Fast and Slow. London: Penguin, 2012.
40. Miller GA. The magical number seven, plus or minus two: some limits on our capacity for processing information. Psychological Review, 1956; 63: 81-97.
41. Higgins J, Green S. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011] [Internet]. The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. Available from: www.cochrane-handbook.org.
42. Cunich M, Salkeld G, Dowie J et al. Integrating evidence and individual preferences using a web-based multi-criteria decision analytic tool: an application to prostate cancer screening. Patient, 2011; 4: 1-10.
43. Pozo-Martin F. Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis (MCDA) as the basis for the development, implementation and evaluation of interactive patient decision aids. PhD thesis, 2013; London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.