Including citizens in institutional reviews: Expectations and experiences from the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate

Health Expectations

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1463-1473

  Adams, Samantha A ^a   van de Bovenkamp, Hester ^a   Robben, Paul ^a  

^a Erasmus University Rotterdam   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Citizen patient participation; Health Inspectorate

Indexed keywords

CONSUMER; GOVERNMENT; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; HEALTH CARE QUALITY; INFORMATION PROCESSING; MANAGEMENT; NETHERLANDS; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; PATIENT SAFETY; POLITICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; STANDARDS;

CONSUMER PARTICIPATION; FOCUS GROUPS; GOVERNMENT AGENCIES; GOVERNMENT REGULATION; INSTITUTIONAL MANAGEMENT TEAMS; NETHERLANDS; PATIENT SAFETY; POLITICS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE;

EID: 84942293155     PISSN: 13696513     EISSN: 13697625     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/hex.12126     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Van de Bovenkamp HM. The Limits of Patient Power: Examining Active Citizenship in Dutch Health Care. Rotterdam: Erasmus Universiteit Rotterdam, 2010.
2. Van der Kraan WGM, Meurs P, Adams SA. Effectieve Medezeggenschap. Een Verkennend Onderzoek Naar Effectieve Vormgeving van Medezeggenschap van Clienten in Algemene Ziekenhuizen. Rotterdam: iBMG, 2008.
3. Adams SA. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: the reflexive patient and "share-your-experience" websites. Social Science and Medicine, 2011; 72: 1069-1076.
4. Ziebland S, Coulter A, Calabrese JD, Locock L. Understanding and Using Health Experiences. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013.
5. Robben P. Burgerperspectief van de IGZ. Utrecht: IGZ, 2011.
6. Hout FAG, Nienhuis E, Robben PBM, Frederiks BJM, Legemaate J. Supervision by the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate. European Journal of Health Law, 2010; 17: 347-360.
7. Tuijn S, Robben PBM, Janssens FJG, van den Berg H. Evaluating instruments for regulation of health care in the Netherlands. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 2011; 17: 411-419.
8. Braithwaite J, Makkai T, Braithwaite V. Regulating Aged Care. Ritualism and the New Pyramid. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 2007.
9. Braithwaite J, Makkai T. Can resident centred inspection of nursing homes work with very sick residents? Health Policy, 1993; 24: 19-33.
10. Scourfield P. A critical reflection on the involvement of 'Experts by Experience' in Inspections. British Journal of Social Work, 2010; 40: 1890-1907.
11. Health & Social Care Regulatory Forum. Framework for Public and Service User Involvement in Health and Social Care Regulation in Ireland, 2009. Available at: http://www.rpii.ie/RPII/files/62/62f874c3-65e6-4b93-b923-695a3c8ba9bf.pdf.
12. Care Quality Commission. Voices into action. How the Care Quality Commission is going to involve people. London: CQC, 2010.
13. Francis R. Mid Staffordshire NHS Foundation Trust Public Inquiry. Final Report. London: The Stationery Office, 2013. Available online: http://www.midstaffspublicinquiry.com/report, accessed 11 march 2013.
14. Hawkes N. How Cure the NHS became the true professionals at Mid Staffs. BMJ: British Medical Journal, 2013; 346: f930.
15. Brabers A, Reitsma M, Friele R. Het beeld van zorggebruikers over de Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg. Utrecht: Nivel, 2013.
16. Helderman JK, Schut FT, van der Grinten TED, van de Ven WPMM. Market-oriented healthcare reforms and policy learning in the Netherlands. Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law, 2005; 30: 189-210.
17. Enthoven AC, van de Ven WPMM. Going Dutch: managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands. New England Journal of Medicine, 2007; 357: 2421-2423.
18. Robben P. Toezicht in een glazen huis. Rotterdam: Erasmus University Rotterdam, 2010.
19. Adams SA. Post-panoptic surveillance through healthcare rating sites: who's watching whom? Information, Communication & Society, 2013; 16: 215-235.
20. Nationale Ombudsman. De Inspectie voor de Gezondheidszorg: Een Papieren Tijger? Den Haag: Nationale Ombudsman, 2009.
21. Nationale Ombudsman. Onverantwoorde Zorg UMCG, Onverantwoord Toezicht IGZ. Den Haag: Nationale Ombudsman, 2011.
22. Tweede Kamer Handelingen. 71:61052010.
23. Tweede Kamer. 24 170. no. 109. 2009-2010.
24. IGZ. Meerjarenbeleidsplan 2012-2015, Voor Gerechtvaardigd Vertrouwen in Verantwoorde Zorg (II). Utrecht: IGZ, 2011.
25. Blok H. Burger en Toezicht. Utrecht: IGZ, 2011.
26. Prosser T. The Regulatory Enterprise. Government, Regulation and Legitimacy. New York: Oxford University Press, 2010.
27. Van de Bovenkamp HM, Trappenburg MJ. Reconsidering patient participation in guideline development. Health Care Analysis, 2009; 17: 198-216.
28. Légaré F, Boivin A, van der Weijden T et al. Patient and public involvement in clinical practice guidelines: a knowledge synthesis of existing programs. Medical Decision Making, 2011; 31: E45-E74.
29. Epstein S. Patient groups and health movements. In: Hackett EJ, Amsterdamska O, Lynch ME, Wajcman J, Bijker WE (eds) The Handbook of Science and Technology Studies. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2008: 499-539.
30. Harrison S, Mort M. Which champions, which people? Public and user involvement in healthcare as a technology of legitimation. Social Policy and Administration, 1998; 32: 60-70.