POST-PANOPTIC SURVEILLANCE THROUGH HEALTHCARE RATING SITES: Who's watching whom?

Information Communication and Society

Volumn 16, Issue 2, 2013, Pages 215-235

  Adams, Samantha ^a  

^a ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

crowdsourcing; health care; patient participation; surveillance privacy; Web 2.0

Indexed keywords

EID: 84874538871     PISSN: 1369118X     EISSN: 14684462     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/1369118X.2012.701657     Document Type: Review

References (35)

1. Abrams, J. (2009) 'Medical experts riled as doctors try to censor their patients', FOXNews.com, 19 February, [Online] Available at: http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,497066,00.html (20 February 2009).
2. Adams, S. A. 2010. "Sourcing the crowd for health experiences: letting the people speak or obliging voice through choice?". In Reconfiguring Health Consumers: Health Work and the Imperative of Personal Responsibility, Edited by: Harris, R., Wyatt, S. and Wathen, N. 178-193. Houndmills: Palgrave.
3. Adams, S. A. 2011. Sourcing the crowd for health services improvement: the reflexive patient and "share-your-experience" websites. Social Science and Medicine, 72(7): 1069-1076. (doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2011.02.001)
4. Albrechtslund, A. 2008. Online social networking as participatory surveillance. First Monday, 13(3) [Online] Available at: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2142/1949 (20 April 2008)
5. Ball, S. 2001. "Performativities and fabrications in the education economy: towards the performative society". In The Performing School: Managing Teaching and Learning in a Performance Culture, Edited by: Gleeson, D. and Husbands, C. 210-226. London: Routledge.
6. de Bont, A. A., Stoevelaar, H. and Bal, R. 2007. Databases as policy instruments. About extending networks as evidence-based policy. BMC Health Services Research, 7(1) [Online] Available at: http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-6963/7/200 (25 January 2012) (doi:10.1186/1472-6963-7-200)
7. de Bont, A. A., Jerak, S., Zuiderent, T., Bal, R. and Meurs, P. 2009. Veiligheid in de zorg: Achtergrond studie bij de Staat van de Gezondheidszorg, Rotterdam: Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University.
8. van de Bovenkamp, H. and Adams, S. A. 2012. Doelgericht deelnemen: Achtergrond studie naar burgerparticipatie bij het toezicht, Rotterdam: Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University.
9. Chavannes, M. 2007. "De burger als toezichthouder. Hoe de burger de overheid kan helpen haar verantwoordelijkheid te hernemen". In Turven, tellen en toetsen: Over toezicht, inspectie, handhaving en evaluatie in Nederland, Edited by: Leeuw, F., Kerseboom, J. and Elte, R. 93-106. The Hague: Boom Juridische Uitgevers.
10. Cordella, A. 2007. E-government: towards the e-bureaucratic form?. Journal of Information Technology, 22(3): 265-274. (doi:10.1057/palgrave.jit.2000105)
11. van Dijck, J. 2009. Users like you? Theorizing agency in user-generated content. Media, Culture and Society, 31(1): 41-58. (doi:10.1177/0163443708098245)
12. Dixon, A., Robertson, R. and Bal, R. 2010. The experience of implementing choice at point of referral: a comparison of the Netherlands and England. Health Economics, Policy and Law, 5(special issue 3): 295-317. (doi:10.1017/S1744133110000058)
13. Enthoven, A. C. and van de Ven, W. 2007. Going Dutch-managed-competition health insurance in the Netherlands. New England Journal of Medicine, 357(24): 2421-2423. (doi:10.1056/NEJMp078199)
14. EURIM (2008) 'How to achieve citizen-centric service delivery: let the people speak', [Online] Available at: http://www.eurim.org.uk/activities/tgdialogues/TGD_IntegratedReport.pdf (25 May 2009).
15. Eysenbach, G. 2009. Infodemiology and infoveillance: framework for an emerging set of public health informatics methods to analyze search, communication and publication behavior on the Internet. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 11(1) p. e11, [Online] Available at: http://www.jmir.org/2009/1/e11/ (12 December 2009) (doi:10.2196/jmir.1157)
16. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
17. Fuchs, C. 2011. Web 2.0, prosumption, and surveillance. Surveillance & Society, 8(3): 289-309.
18. Ganascia, J. 2010. The generalized sousveillance society. Social Science Information, 49(3): 489-507. (doi:10.1177/0539018410371027)
19. Goldberg, D. 2010. Physicians have limited recourse against online defamation. Dermatology Times, 1 October, [Online] Available at: http://www.webcitation.org/5wh4QPJiN (15 October 2010)
20. Gray, A. and Harrison, S. 2004. Governing Medicine: Theory and Practice, Maidenhead: Open University Press.
21. Hout, F. A. G., Nienhuis, E. D., Robben, P. B. M., Frederiks, B. J. M. and Legemaate, J. 2010. Supervision by the Dutch Healthcare Inspectorate. European Journal of Health Law, 17(4): 347-360. (doi:10.1163/157180910X516358)
22. Iedema, R. and Rhodes, C. 2010. The undecided space of ethics in organizational surveillance. Organization Studies, 31(2): 199-217. (doi:10.1177/0170840609347128)
23. Mann, S., Nolan, J. and Wellman, B. 2003. Sousveillance: inventing and using wearable computing devices for data collection in surveillance environments. Surveillance & Society, 1(3): 331-355.
24. Margetts, H. Z. 2009. The internet and public policy. Policy & Internet, 1(1) [Online] Available at: http://www.psocommons.org/policyandinternet/vol1/iss1/art1 (7 January 2010)
25. Perryman, J. 2009. Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5): 611-631. (doi:10.1080/02680930903125129)
26. Pridmore, J. (2010) 'Collaborative surveillance: configuring contemporary marketing practice', paper presented at the Political Economy of Surveillance Workshop, September, Milton Keynes.
27. Rabinow, P. 1984. The Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books.
28. Reading, A. (2008) 'The playful panopticon? Ethics and the coded self in social networking sites', in Proceedings of Mobile Communication and the Ethics of Social Networking, pp. 240-248, [Online] Available at: http://www.socialscience.t-mobile.hu/2008/Preproceedings.pdf#page=240 (31 March 2010).
29. Robben, P. (2010) Toezicht in een glazen huis, Inaugural lecture, Institute of Health Policy and Management (iBMG), Erasmus University, Rotterdam.
30. Singleton, V. 2005. The promise of public health: vulnerable policy and lazy citizens. Society and Space, 23(5): 771-786.
31. Slevin, J. 2000. The Internet and Society, Cambridge: Polity.
32. Thompson, J. B. 1995. The Media and Modernity, Cambridge: Polity.
33. Trommel, W. 2006. NPM en de wedergeboorte van het professionele ideaal. B & M Tijdschrift voor beleid, politiek en maatschappij, 33(3): 137-147.
34. Woodward, C. (2009) '"Anti-defamation" group seeks to tame the rambunctious world of online doctor reviews', CMAJ, vol. 180, no. 10, p. 1010.
35. Zimmer, M. 2008. The externalities of web 2.0: the emerging privacy threats when the drive for the perfect search engine meets web 2.0. First Monday, 13(3) [Online] Available at: http://www.uic.edu/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/2136/1944 (20 April 2008)