Monitoring and Sampling Strategy for (Manufactured) Nano Objects, Agglomerates and Aggregates (NOAA): Potential Added Value of the NANODEVICE Project

Handbook of Nanosafety: Measurement, Exposure and Toxicology

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 173-206

  Brouwer, Derk H ^a   Lidén, Göran ^b   Asbach, Christof ^c   Berges, Markus G M ^d   van Tongeren, Martie ^e  

^a TNO   (Netherlands)

^b STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c Institute of Energy and Environmental Technology IUTA   (Germany)

^d INSTITUT FÜR ARBEITSSCHUTZ DER DEUTSCHEN GESETZLICHEN UNFALLVERSICHERUNG IFA   (Germany)

^e INSTITUTE OF OCCUPATIONAL MEDICINE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Devices; Exposure; Measurement strategy; Monitoring; NOAA; Samplers; Sampling; Workplace

Indexed keywords

AGGLOMERATION; AGGREGATES; MONITORING; SAMPLING;

DEVICES; EXPOSURE; MEASUREMENT STRATEGIES; NOAA; SAMPLERS; WORKPLACE;

NANOSTRUCTURED MATERIALS;

EID: 84942246922     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B978-0-12-416604-2.00005-6     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. Brouwer D., Berges M., Virji M.A., et al. Harmonization of measurement strategies for exposure to manufactured nano-objects; report of a workshop. Ann Occup Hyg 2012, 56(1):1-9.
2. Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Asbach C., Fissan H., et al. Nanoparticle exposure at nanotechnology workplaces: A review. Particle Fibre Toxicol 2011, 8. art. no. 22.
3. Ramachandran G., Ostraat M., Evans D.E., et al. A Strategy for Assessing Workplace Exposures to Nanomaterials. J Occup Environ Hyg 2011, 8(11):673-685.
4. Brouwer D. Exposure to manufactured nanoparticles in different workplaces. Toxicology 2010, 269(2-3):120-127.
5. Löndahl J., Pagels J., Swietlicki E., et al. J. A set-up for field studies of respiratory tract deposition of fine and ultrafine particles in humans. Aerosol Sci 2006, 37:1152-1163.
6. Bartley D.L., Vincent J.H. Sampling conventions for estimating ultrafine and fine aerosol particle deposition in the human respiratory tract. Ann Occup Hyg 2011, 55:696-709.
7. Lin M.I., Groves W.A., Freivalds A., et al. Laboratory evaluation of a physiologic sampling pump (PSP). J Environ Monit 2010, 12(7):1415-1421.
8. Stolzenburg M.R., McMurry P.H. An ultrafine aerosol condensation nucleus counter. Aerosol Sci Technol 1991, 14:48-65.
9. Hering S.V., Stolzenburg M.R., Quant F.R., et al. A laminar-flow, water-based condensation particle counter (WCPC). Aerosol Sci Technol 2005, 39:659-672.
10. Aitken J. On improvements in the apparatus for counting the dust particles in the atmosphere. Proc R Soc Edinburgh 1889, 16(129):134-172.
11. Aitken J. On the number of dust particles in the atmosphere. Trans R Soc Edinburgh 1888, 35(1):1-19.
12. Asbach C., Kaminski H., Von Barany D., et al. Comparability of portable nanoparticle exposure monitors. Ann Occup Hyg 2012, 56:606-621.
13. McMurry P. The history of condensation nucleus counters. Aerosol Sci Technol 2000, 33:297-322.
14. Fierz M., Houle C., Steigmeier P., Burtscher H. Design, calibration, and field performance of a miniature diffusion size classifier. Aerosol Sci Technol 2011, 45(1):1-10.
15. Marra J., Voetz M., Kiesling H.J. Monitor for detecting and assessing exposure to airborne nanoparticles. J Nanopart Res 2010, 12:21-37.
16. Asbach C., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Kaminski H., et al. Standard Operation Procedures For assessing exposure to nanomaterials, following a tiered approach. NanoGem 2012.
17. Kaminski H., Kuhlbusch T.A.J., Rath S., et al. Comparability of Mobility Particle Sizers and Diffusion Chargers. J Aerosol Sci 2013, 57:156-178.
18. Mills J.B., Park J.H., Peters T.M. Comparison of the DiSCmini Aerosol Monitor to a Handheld Condensation Particle Counter and a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer for Submicrometer Sodium Chloride and Metal Aerosols. J Occup Environ Hygiene 2013, (http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/15459624.2013.769077) in press.
19. ICRP Human Respiratory Tract Model for Radiological Protection. ICRP Publication 66 1994, Ann ICRP 24(1-3).
20. Oberdörster G. Toxicology of ultrafine particles: in vivo studies. Philos Trans R Soc A 2000, 358:2719-2740.
21. Fissan H., Neumann S., Trampe A., et al. Rationale and principle of an instrument measuring lung deposited nanoparticle surface area. J Nanopart Res 2007, 9:53-59.
22. Shin W.G., Pui D.Y.H., Fissan H., et al. Calibration and numerical simulation of nanoparticle surface area monitor (TSI model 3550 NSAM). J Nanopart Res 2007, 9:61-69.
23. Asbach C., Fissan H., Stahlmecke B., et al. Conceptual Limitations and Extensions of Lung Deposited Nanoparticle Surface Area Monitor (NSAM). J Nanopart Res 2009, 11:101-109.
24. Fuchs N.A. On the stationary charge distribution on aerosol particles in bipolar ionic atmosphere. Geofis Pura Appl 1963, 56:185-193.
25. Jung H., Kittelson D.B. Characterization of Aerosol Surface Instruments in Transition Regime. Aerosol Sci Technol 2005, 39:902-911.
26. Wiedensohler A., Martinsson B.G., Hansson H.-C. A new unipolar charger for submicron particles. J Aerosol Sci 1990, 21(Suppl. 1):S571-S574.
27. Lee H.M., Kim C.S., Shimada M., Okuyama K. Bipolar diffusion charging for aerosol nanoparticle measurement using a soft X-ray charger. J Aerosol Sci 2005, 36:813-829.
28. Pui D.Y.H., Liu B.Y.H. A submicron aerosol standard and the primary absolute calibration of the condensation nuclei counter. J Colloid Interface Sci 1974, 47:155-171.
29. Hoppel W.A. Determination of the aerosol size distribution from the mobility distribution of the charged fraction of aerosols. J Aerosol Sci 1978, 9:41-54.
30. Fissan H., Helsper C., Thielen H.J. Determination of particle size distribution by means of an electrostatic classifier. J Aerosol Sci 1983, 14:354-357.
31. Helsper C., Horn H.G., Schneider F., et al. Intercomparison of five mobility particle size spectrometers for measuring atmospheric submicrometer aerosol particles. Gefahrstoffe - Reinhalt Luft 2008, 68:475-481.
32. Asbach C., Kaminski H., Fissan H., et al. Comparison of four mobility particle sizers with different time resolution for stationary exposure measurements. J Nanopart Res 2009, 11:1593-1609.
33. Leskinen J., Joutsensaari J., Lyyränen J., et al. Comparison of nanoparticle measurement instruments for occupational health applications. J Nanopart Res 2012, 14:718.
34. International Organization for Standardization Determination of particle size distribution - Differential electrical mobility analysis for aerosol particles 2009, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 15900:2009-05 (E).
35. International Organization for Standardization Workplace atmospheres - Characterization of ultrafine aerosols/ nanoaerosols - Determination of the size distribution and number concentration using differential electrical mobility analysing systems 2011, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 28439.
36. Tammet H., Mirme A., Tamm E. Electrical aerosol spectrometer of Tartu University. Atmos Res 2002, 62:315-324.
37. Jeong C.H., Evans G.J. Inter-comparison of a Fast mobility Particle Sizer and a Scanning Mobility Particle Sizer incorporating an ultrafine water-based condensation particle counter. Aerosol Sci Technol 2009, 43:364-373.
38. Bartley D.L. Do We Really Need SEVEN New Aerosol Particle Sampling Conventions?. Ann Occup Hyg 2011, 55(7):692-695.
39. Comité Européen de Normalisation Air Quality - Sampling conventions for airborne particle deposition in the human respiratory system 2012, Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels, Belgium, EN ISO13138:2012.
40. International Organization for Standardization Nanotechnologies - Guidelines for occupational risk management applied to engineered nanomaterials - Part 1: Principles and approaches 2011, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO TC 229.
41. Cena L.G., Anthony T.R., Peters T.M. A Personal Nanoparticle Respiratory Deposition (NRD) Sampler. Environ Sci Technol 2011, 45(15):6483-6490.
42. Gorbunov B., Priest N.D., Muir R.B., et al. A Novel Size-Selective Airborne Particle Size Fractionating Instrument for Health Risk Evaluation. Ann Occup Hyg 2009, 53(3):225-237.
43. Tsai C.J., Liu C.N., Hung S.M., et al. Novel Active Personal Nanoparticle Sampler for the Exposure Assessment of Nanoparticles in Workplaces. Environ Sci Technol 2012, 46(8):4546-4552. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/es204580f.
44. Furuuchi M., Choosong T., Hata M., et al. Development of a Personal Sampler for Evaluating Exposure to Ultrafine Particles. Aerosol Air Qual Res 2010, 10(1):30-37.
45. Hata M., Thongyen T., Bao L., et al. Development of a high-volume air sampler for nanoparticles. Environ Sci: Processes Impacts 2013, 15(2):454-462.
46. Tsai C.-J., Chen D.-R., Chein H., et al. Theoretical and Experimental Study of an Axial Flow Cyclone for Fine Particle Removal in Vacuum Conditions. J Aerosol Sci 2004, 35(9):1105-1118.
47. Hsu Y.-D., Chein H.M., Chen T.M., Tsai C.-J. Axial Flow Cyclone for Segregation and Collection of Ultrafine Particles: Theoretical and Experimental Study. Environ Sci Technol 2005, 39(5):1299-1308.
48. Tsai C.-J., Chen S.-C., Przekop R., Moskal A. Study of an Axial Flow Cyclone to Remove Nanoparticles in Vacuum. Environ Sci Technol 2007, 41(5):1689-1695.
49. Chen S.-C., Tsai C.-J. An axial flow cyclone to remove nanoparticles at low pressure conditions. J Nanopart Res 2007, 9(1):71-83.
50. International Organization for Standardization Workplace air - Determination of metals and metalloids in airborne particulate matter by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry - Part 2: Sample preparation 2012, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 15202-2.
51. International Organization for Standardization Workplace air - Determination of metals and metalloids in airborne particulate matter by inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectrometry - Part 3: Analysis 2008, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 15202-3.
52. International Organization for Standardization Workplace air - Determination of metals and metalloids in airborne particulate matter by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry 2010, International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland, ISO 30011.
53. Liu B.Y.H., Pui D.Y.H., Rubow K.L. Characteristics of Air Sampling Filter Media. AEROSOLS in the Mining and Industrial Work Environments 1983, 989-1038. Ann Arbor Science Publishers, Ann Arbor (MI), USA, 1983. V.A. Marple, B.Y.H. Liu (Eds.).
54. Cyrs W.D., Boysen D.A., Casuccio G., et al. Nanoparticle collection efficiency of capillary pore membrane filters. J Aerosol Sci 2010, 41(7):655-664.
55. Lyyränen J., Backman U., Tapper U., et al. A size selective nanoparticle collection device based on diffusion and thermophoresis. J Phys 2009, Conference Series 170:012011.
56. R'mili B., Le Bihan O.L.C., Dutouquet C., et al. Particle Sampling by TEM Grid Filtration. Aerosol Sci Technol 2013, 47(7):767-775.
57. Dye A.L., Rhead M.M., Trier C.J. A Porous Carbon Film for the Collection of Atmospheric Aerosol for Transmission Electron Microscopy. J Microsc 1997, 187(2):134-138.
58. Tsai S.-J., Ada E., Isaacs J.A., Ellenbecker M.J. Airborne nanoparticle exposures associated with the manual handling of nanoalumina and nanosilver in fume hoods. J Nanopart Res 2009, 11:147-161.
59. Bard D., Thorpe A., Wake D., et al. Investigations of methods for the sampling of airborne nanoparticles by electron microscopy. Inhaled Particles X 2008, Sheffield, UK.
60. Dixkens J., Fissan H. Development of an Electrostatic Precipitator for Off-Line Particle Analysis. Aerosol Sci Technol 1990, 30(5):438-453.
61. Miller A., Frey G., King G., Sunderman C. A Handheld Electrostatic Precipitator for Sampling Airborne Particles and Nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol 2010, 44(6):417-427.
62. Thomassen Y., Koch W., Dunkhorst W., et al. Ultrafine particles at workplaces of a primary aluminium smelter. J Environ Monit 2006, 8(1):127-133.
63. Wen J., Wexler A.S. Thermophoretic Sampler and its Application in Ultrafine Particle Collection. Aerosol Sci Technol 2007, 41(6):624-629.
64. Thayer D., Koehler K.A., Marchese A., Volckens J. A Personal, Thermophoretic Sampler for Airborne Nanoparticles. Aerosol Sci Technol 2011, 45(6):744-750.
65. Li C., Liu S., Zhu Y. Determining Ultrafine Particle Collection Efficiency in a Nanometer Aerosol Sampler. Aerosol Sci Technol 2010, 44(11):1027-1041.
66. Bau S., Ouf F.X., Miquel S., et al. Experimental measurement of the collection efficiency of nanoparticle samplers based on electrostatic and thermophoretic precipitation. International Aerosol Conference 2010, Helsinki, Finland; 2010.
67. Nash D.G., Leith D. Ultrafine Particle Sampling with the UNC Passive Aerosol Sampler. Aerosol Sci Technol 2010, 44(12):1059-1064.
68. BOHS/NAVVA Testing Compliance with Occupational Exposure Limits for Airborne Substances 2011, Derby/Eindhoven. http://www.bohs.org/library/technical-publications.
69. Peters T.M., Elzey S., Johnson R., et al. Airborne Monitoring to Distinguish Engineered Nanomaterials from Incidental Particles for Environmental Health and Safety. J Occup Environ Hyg 2009, 6:73-81.
70. NIOSH Draft current intelligence bulletin: occupational exposure to carbon nanotubes and nanofibers 2013, US Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control, National Institute for Occupational safety and Health, Cincinnati, OH, DHHS (NIOSH), NIOSH Docket Number: NIOSH 161-A; Available at. http://www.cdc.gov/%20niosh/docket/review/docket161A/.
71. ®), Diesel particulate matter (supplement issued 3/15/03). 4th ed 1994, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health, Cincinnati, Ohio, DHHS (NIOSH) Publication No. 94-113 [www.cdc.gov/niosh/nmam/]. P.C. Schlecht, P.F. O'Conner (Eds.).
72. Crilley L.R., Knibbs L.D., Miljevic B., et al. Concentration and oxidative potential of on-road particle emissions and their relationship with traffic composition: Relevance to exposure assessment. Atmos Environ 2012, 59:533-539.
73. Smita S., Gupta S.K., Bartonova A., et al. Nanoparticles in the environment: Assessment using the causal diagram approach. Environ Health 2012, 11(Suppl. 1):13.
74. NIOSH Current intelligence bulletin 63: occupational exposure to titanium dioxide 2011, Department of Health and Human Services, Public health Service, Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Cincinnati, OH, Publication No. 2011-160.
75. Methner M., Hodson L., Geraci C. Nanoparticle emission assessment technique (NEAT) for the identification and measurement of potential inhalation exposure to engineered nanomaterials-part A. J Occup Environ Hyg 2010, 7:127-132.
76. BSI Nanotechnologies-part 3: guide to assessing airborne exposure in occupational settings relevant to nanomaterials 2010, British Standards Institution, London, UK, (BSI PD 6699-3:2010).
77. VCI Tiered Approach to an Exposure Measurement and Assessment of Nanoscale Aerosols Released from Engineered Nanomaterials in Workplace Operations 2011, Presented by: IUTA, BAuA, BG RCI, VCI, IFA, TUD. https://www.vci.de/Downloads/Nanomaterials%20in%20Workplace%20Operations.pdf.
78. Witschger O., Le Bihan O., Reynier M., et al. Recommendations for characterizing potential emissions and exposure to aerosols released from nanomaterials in workplace operations. Hyg Secur Trav - 1er trimestre 2012, 226:41-55.
79. McGarry P., Morawska L., Morris H., et al. Measurements of particle emissions from nanotechnology processes, with assessment of measuring techniques and workplace controls 2012, Safe Work Australia.
80. Brouwer D.H. Control Banding Approaches for Nanomaterials. Ann Occup Hyg 2012, 56:506-514. 10.1093/anhyg/MES039.
81. Van Broekhuizen P., Van Broekhuizen F., Cornelissen R., Reijnders L. Workplace exposure to nanoparticles and the application of provisional nanoreference values in times of uncertain risks. J Nanoparticle Res 2012, 14(4). art. no. 770.